I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface. The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on. Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that 1 class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique only at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
6  1269 
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear one down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where I think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface. The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business
logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web
site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on. Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that 1
class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique only
at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
I don't know what is on your site, but it crashed my internet explorer twice
and firefox has high cpu usage and showing an apparent memory leak (memory
usage constantly climbing)
Best regards,
Dave Colliver. http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~ http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:OE******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear one
down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where I
think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
>I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface.
The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business
logic
>layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so
there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web
site,
>we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on. Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that 1
class
>instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique only
at
>the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
>an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
>hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
That's something MS did.
Its a IE issue, some SP they released on August.
Its something along the lines of "http 1.1" in the IE advanced options.
I don't know, it does the same for me.
You'd think an msn space page would actually work with IE.
"David" <da************ *****@revilloc. REMOVETHIS.comw rote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP02.phx.gbl. ..
I don't know what is on your site, but it crashed my internet explorer
twice
and firefox has high cpu usage and showing an apparent memory leak (memory
usage constantly climbing)
Best regards,
Dave Colliver.
http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~
http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:OE******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear one
down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where I
think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface.
The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business
logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so
there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web
site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on. Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that
the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a
Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that 1
class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique
only
at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
Ah, OK, but it still is a big problem.
It even fails on firefox, but at least I get a chance to read the page on
FF. I reading it on my laptop, which is on my knee and it gets really hot,
so I saved the page to my HD, removed the script at the top and can read it.
(I could only do this in FF, IE crashed twice. I gave up with IE.).
Best regards,
Dave Colliver. http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~ http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:%2******** **********@TK2M SFTNGP03.phx.gb l...
That's something MS did.
Its a IE issue, some SP they released on August.
Its something along the lines of "http 1.1" in the IE advanced options.
I don't know, it does the same for me.
You'd think an msn space page would actually work with IE.
"David" <da************ *****@revilloc. REMOVETHIS.comw rote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP02.phx.gbl. ..
>I don't know what is on your site, but it crashed my internet explorer
twice
>and firefox has high cpu usage and showing an apparent memory leak
(memory
usage constantly climbing)
Best regards,
Dave Colliver.
http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~
http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:OE******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP02.phx.gbl.. .
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear one
down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the
MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where I
think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface.
The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business
logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of
our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so
there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web
site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on.
Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that
the
>code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a
Singleton
>database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that
1
class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique
only
at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
My FireFox works ok with it. (No crashes).
Yeah, I gave up on IE also. I have FF open .. with my blog stuff, and is
the only thing I have in FF.
I just did a Windows Update yesterday, so ............ I'm as good as I can
get with IE.
Crazy stuff, crazy stuff.
"David" <da************ *****@revilloc. REMOVETHIS.comw rote in message
news:et******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...
Ah, OK, but it still is a big problem.
It even fails on firefox, but at least I get a chance to read the page on
FF. I reading it on my laptop, which is on my knee and it gets really hot,
so I saved the page to my HD, removed the script at the top and can read
it.
(I could only do this in FF, IE crashed twice. I gave up with IE.).
Best regards,
Dave Colliver.
http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~
http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:%2******** **********@TK2M SFTNGP03.phx.gb l...
That's something MS did.
Its a IE issue, some SP they released on August.
Its something along the lines of "http 1.1" in the IE advanced options.
I don't know, it does the same for me.
You'd think an msn space page would actually work with IE.
"David" <da************ *****@revilloc. REMOVETHIS.comw rote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP02.phx.gbl. ..
I don't know what is on your site, but it crashed my internet explorer
twice
and firefox has high cpu usage and showing an apparent memory leak
(memory
usage constantly climbing)
Best regards,
Dave Colliver.
http://www.AshfieldFOCUS.com
~~
http://www.FOCUSPortals.com - Local franchises available
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.ne twrote in message
news:OE******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection
objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear
one
down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the
MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where
I
think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user
interface.
The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the
business
logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of
our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so
there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the
web
site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on.
Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that
the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a
Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share
that
1
class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique
only
at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
Sloan,
Thanks for the information, I am reviewing that now. I thought I would
write you back since you asked about how I implemented singleton in asp.net.
In my class library, as I mentioned, I have a database class that is my data
layer. In this class I have a private static variable that will hold the
single instance of the class.
So it would look something like this:
Public Class MyDatabaseClass
{
...
private static MyDatabaseClass dbInstance;
... //other private attributes
Public static MyDatabaseClass myDb()
{
if (dbInstance == null)
dbInstance = new MyDatabaseClass ;
return dbInstance;
}
}
Everything else is implemented as instance methods or functions.
So now, elsewhere within the object model, this would be called as
MyDatabaseClass .mydb
I do agree with your assessment, however that the fact that I am using this
1 instance of a database layer is causing my problems.
Thanks for your help.
Guy.
"sloan" wrote:
You can check this article out:
5/24/2006
Custom Objects/Collections and Tiered Development
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/
Some additional thoughts.
Make sure you do some locking with the Singleton.
Or abandon the Singleton thinking altogether.
How are you writing an Asp.Net singleton?
See
10/24/2005
Web Session Wrapper for storing and retrieving objects
Make sure you close your IDataReaders. Don't reuse connection objects.
It is less expensive to start a new connection object, then to tear one down
and build it back up.
I'd take a deep look at the first blog entry above, and then read the MS
article I mention at the bottom of that article.
On my blog, pay attention to the "SqlHelper is a substitute of your
application's data layer object".
I'd abandon a Singleton as a database class. Its more important to
Open LATE
Use quickly.
Close quickly.
Make sure you close and don't let connections linger. This is where I think
youre singleton is probably screwing you.
"Guy Thornton" <wd************ ****@incresearc h.comwrote in message
news:E7******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
I have an application in asp.net using vb.
The asp.net portion of this application is mainly the user interface. The
UI has references made to our business logic layer. And the business
logic
layer uses a database class to access our data environment.
The business logic layer and database class is compiled into a class
library. The database class is a single class that contains all of our
queries there. It is implemented following the Singleton pattern so there
should only be 1 instance of the class.
The problem we are having is when multiple users start hitting the web
site,
we get very erratic errors to occur at different points within the
application. All errors are System.InvalidO perationExcepti on. Invalid
attempt to read when reader is closed.
The application runs fine with 1 user on the system. So I know that the
code logic is ok. I am concerned that because I implemented a Singleton
database class, that all users in the system are trying to share that 1
class
instance.
Has anybody encountered this before?
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
Some questions I would love to hear about are
1. When using class libraries, is a copy of the object model unique only
at
the application level or at the session level?
2. Is there a way to specify at what level an object model may live
within
an asp.net app?
Any feedback someone may have would greatly be appreciated. We have
rather
hit a wall here and do not know how to continue.
Thanks.
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Jack Addington |
last post by:
I've got a fairly simple application implementation that over time is going
to get a lot bigger. I'm really trying to implement it in a way that will
facilitate the growth. I am first writing a WinForms interface and then
need to port that to a web app. I am kinda stuck on a design issue and need
some suggestions / direction.
Basically I have a business layer that I want to use to process any
dataentry logic (row focus changes, data...
|
by: Stuart Hilditch |
last post by:
Hi all,
I am hoping that someone with some experience developing nTier apps can give
me some advice here.
I am writing an nTier web app that began with a Data Access Layer (DAL),
Business Logic Layer (BLL) and User Interface Layer (UIL).
The problem I found with this was circular referencing...
|
by: pcthug |
last post by:
Hi All,
I am creating multi-tier app in vb.net using visual studio .net.
I create a invoice.vb class file with properties, events and methods. This
also has a line item collection class (lineitem.vb & lineitems.vb). I create
a form (form1.frm) and write the corresponding code to initialize an invoice
object, there are textboxes on the form to display the data, an update and
load button. My data is stored in an access database.
|
by: Noel |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm currently developing a web service that retrieves data from an employee
table. I would like to send and retrieve a custom employee class to/from the
webservice. I have currently coded the custom employee class and have built
it as a separate library (employee.dll). This employee.dll is being
referenced by both the web service and the windows application.
I face the following problem when I send this class to the webservice.
|
by: Smithers |
last post by:
In Windows Forms MDI applications...
I'm wondering if it is standard practice to create DAL and business objects
as static classes. The only alternative (please enlighten me if I'm wrong
about this) is to instantiate the DAL and business objects in a Form class -
most likely the MDI parent - and then expose the business objects as public
members.
What is standard practice here? .
| | |
by: Tarun Mistry |
last post by:
Hi all, I have posted this in both the c# and asp.net groups as it applies
to both (apologies if it breaks some group rules).
I am making a web app in asp.net using c#. This is the first fully OO
application I will be making, also my first .NET application, so im looking
for any help and guidance.
Ok, my problems are todo with object and database abstraction, what should i
do.
|
by: gunimpi |
last post by:
http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?p=2745431#post2745431
********************************************************
VB6 OR VBA & Webbrowser DOM Tiny $50 Mini Project Programmer help
wanted
********************************************************
For this teeny job, please refer to:
http://feeds.reddit.com/feed/8fu/?o=25
|
by: waheed azad |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a been developing an accounting system for a non-profit organization. I had decided to to divide the solution, in three layers, presentation, business layer and database layer.
My business layer is composed of objects like Account, Transaction, Voucher etc. And my database layer is composed of objects like AccountDB, TransactionDB, VoucherDB.
Now each of my layer is residing in a seperate project under the same solution....
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?QkY=?= |
last post by:
I want to improve the response time of my application.
I have 3 options:
1. Run both ASPX pages and our business objects on web server and use web
farm technology.
2. Move our business objects to COM+ as serviced components. Then run our
web pages on web servers in a web farm. And run COM+ on other clustered
servers.
3. Move our business objects to .NET remoting or web service. Run our web
pages on one web farm. Run .NET remoting or...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| | |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
