javascript and email (part 2)

[rvj]

Ive come a cross another issue when trying to convert CDO VB to JS

The basic send generated the SendUsing configuration is invalid which I
understand means I have to specify the smpt server (amongst other
things)using the configuration object

*************** *************** ****

Set objConfig = Server.CreateOb ject("CDO.Confi guration")
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUsingM ethod) = cdoSendUsingPor t
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer )="smtp.server. co.uk"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer Port)=25
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPAuthen ticate)=cdoBasi c
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUserNa me) = "mxxxxxxxx-x"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendPasswo rd) = "xxxxxxxx"
Set objMail.Configu ration = objConfig

*************** *********

so do I assume that the following COM syntax should work with JS and
are the cdoconstants script independent ?

*************** ********
var objConfig = Server.CreateOb ject("CDO.Confi guration")
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUsingM ethod) = cdoSendUsingPor t
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer )="smtp.server. co.uk"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer Port)=25
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPAuthen ticate)=cdoBasi c
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUserNa me) = "mxxxxxxxx-x"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendPasswo rd) = "xxxxxxxx"
objConfig.Field s.Update ()

var objMail.Configu ration = objConfig

[Anthony Jones]

"rvj" <rv*@rolemodels .netwrote in message
news:ug******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...

>
Ive come a cross another issue when trying to convert CDO VB to JS

The basic send generated the SendUsing configuration is invalid which I
understand means I have to specify the smpt server (amongst other
things)using the configuration object

*************** *************** ****

Set objConfig = Server.CreateOb ject("CDO.Confi guration")
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUsingM ethod) = cdoSendUsingPor t
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer )="smtp.server. co.uk"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer Port)=25
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPAuthen ticate)=cdoBasi c
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUserNa me) = "mxxxxxxxx-x"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendPasswo rd) = "xxxxxxxx"
Set objMail.Configu ration = objConfig

*************** *********

so do I assume that the following COM syntax should work with JS and
are the cdoconstants script independent ?

*************** ********
var objConfig = Server.CreateOb ject("CDO.Confi guration")
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUsingM ethod) = cdoSendUsingPor t
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer )="smtp.server. co.uk"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPServer Port)=25
objConfig.Field s(cdoSMTPAuthen ticate)=cdoBasi c
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendUserNa me) = "mxxxxxxxx-x"
objConfig.Field s(cdoSendPasswo rd) = "xxxxxxxx"
objConfig.Field s.Update ()

var objMail.Configu ration = objConfig

You are going to need to find the constant and enumeration values for all
the cdo members you want to use and create variables to hold them so that
code such as the above will work. For example

var cdo = {}

cdo.SendUsingMe thod =
'http://schemas.microso ft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing'
cdo.SMTPServer = 'http://schemas.microso ft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver'
cdo.SendUsingPo rt = 2

objConfig.Field s(cdo.SendUsing Method) = cdo.SendUsingPo rt

[Dave Anderson]

"Anthony Jones" wrote:

You are going to need to find the constant and enumeration values
for all the cdo members you want to use and create variables to
hold them so that code such as the above will work.

No, he will not need to do that. He can use a TYPELIB declaration in
global.asa and drive right on as in his example.

--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms.

[Anthony Jones]

"Dave Anderson" <NY**********@s pammotel.comwro te in message
news:12******** *****@corp.supe rnews.com...

"Anthony Jones" wrote:

You are going to need to find the constant and enumeration values
for all the cdo members you want to use and create variables to
hold them so that code such as the above will work.

No, he will not need to do that. He can use a TYPELIB declaration in
global.asa and drive right on as in his example.

You're quite right. I was under the impression for some reason that only
worked in the VBScript environment but it does indeed work with JScript just
as well. Eg.:-

<%@language=JSc ript%>
<!-- METADATA NAME="Microsoft CDO For Exchange 2000 Library"
TYPE="TypeLib" UUID="{CD000000-8B95-11D1-82DB-00C04FB1625D}" -->
<%
Response.Write( cdoSMTPServer)
%>

If only one or two pages need the type library it might be better to just
place the METADATA directive in just those pages rather than in the
global.asa.

[rvj]

Anyway - thanks to both of you !!!!
I finally managed to send an email !!!
"Anthony Jones" <An*@yadayadaya da.comwrote in message
news:OV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...

>
"Dave Anderson" <NY**********@s pammotel.comwro te in message
news:12******** *****@corp.supe rnews.com...

>"Anthony Jones" wrote:

You are going to need to find the constant and enumeration values
for all the cdo members you want to use and create variables to
hold them so that code such as the above will work.

No, he will not need to do that. He can use a TYPELIB declaration in
global.asa and drive right on as in his example.

You're quite right. I was under the impression for some reason that only
worked in the VBScript environment but it does indeed work with JScript
just
as well. Eg.:-

<%@language=JSc ript%>
<!-- METADATA NAME="Microsoft CDO For Exchange 2000 Library"
TYPE="TypeLib" UUID="{CD000000-8B95-11D1-82DB-00C04FB1625D}" -->
<%
Response.Write( cdoSMTPServer)
%>

If only one or two pages need the type library it might be better to just
place the METADATA directive in just those pages rather than in the
global.asa.

[rvj]

PS

Just out of interest does anyone know if its possible to turn off CDO
sender address checking (.From property) ?

From
E-mail address of the primary author of the message. This property is
optional; if left blank, the From property will be set to the value of the
Sender property, assuming a value for this property has been configured. If
neither the From property nor the Sender property is configured, the script
will fail.

It only appears to accept an "email type" syntax rather than plain text.
However most of the emails I recieve tend to have the From content in plain
text so I assume this is possible?.

"rvj" <rv*@rolemodels .netwrote in message
news:uS******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...

>

Anyway - thanks to both of you !!!!
I finally managed to send an email !!!
"Anthony Jones" <An*@yadayadaya da.comwrote in message
news:OV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...

>>
"Dave Anderson" <NY**********@s pammotel.comwro te in message
news:12******* ******@corp.sup ernews.com...

>>"Anthony Jones" wrote:
You are going to need to find the constant and enumeration values
for all the cdo members you want to use and create variables to
hold them so that code such as the above will work.

No, he will not need to do that. He can use a TYPELIB declaration in
global.asa and drive right on as in his example.

You're quite right. I was under the impression for some reason that only
worked in the VBScript environment but it does indeed work with JScript
just
as well. Eg.:-

<%@language=JS cript%>
<!-- METADATA NAME="Microsoft CDO For Exchange 2000 Library"
TYPE="TypeLi b" UUID="{CD000000-8B95-11D1-82DB-00C04FB1625D}" -->
<%
Response.Write (cdoSMTPServer)
%>

If only one or two pages need the type library it might be better to just
place the METADATA directive in just those pages rather than in the
global.asa.

[Dave Anderson]

Anthony Jones wrote:

If only one or two pages need the type library it might be
better to just place the METADATA directive in just those
pages rather than in the global.asa.

Better how?

I ask because it is not clear to me that there is a performance issue. After
all, Application_OnS tart() is in global.asa, and it does not get used by
every page/request, so it occurs to me that the TYPELIB may simply be loaded
with the application. I understand that using the TYPELIB is more costly
than adovbs.inc (or equivalent) at runtime, but that would seem to be true
whether you put it directly in your script or in the global.asa, wouldn't
it?

--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms.

[Anthony Jones]

"Dave Anderson" <NY**********@s pammotel.comwro te in message
news:ef******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...

Anthony Jones wrote:

If only one or two pages need the type library it might be
better to just place the METADATA directive in just those
pages rather than in the global.asa.

Better how?

It just doesn't make sense to modify a global resource for the benefit of
just one or two pages.

I ask because it is not clear to me that there is a performance issue.

After

all, Application_OnS tart() is in global.asa, and it does not get used by
every page/request, so it occurs to me that the TYPELIB may simply be

loaded

with the application. I understand that using the TYPELIB is more costly
than adovbs.inc (or equivalent) at runtime, but that would seem to be true
whether you put it directly in your script or in the global.asa, wouldn't
it?

I'm surprised to hear that. I would have thought the use of adovbs.inc was
more expensive but I've never really looked into.

[Dave Anderson]

"Anthony Jones" wrote:

>I understand that using the TYPELIB is more costly than
adovbs.inc (or equivalent) at runtime, but that would seem
to be true whether you put it directly in your script or
in the global.asa, wouldn't it?

I'm surprised to hear that. I would have thought the use of
adovbs.inc was more expensive but I've never really looked
into.

Judge for yourself:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/ar...22/430881.aspx

In particular, note Eric's acknowledgement that we often trade performance
for ease of use. I have absolutely no problem throwing ADO and CDO TYPELIB
declarations in my application roots because I never know A PRIORI if/where
I will need them.

--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms.

[Anthony Jones]

"Dave Anderson" <NY**********@s pammotel.comwro te in message
news:12******** *****@corp.supe rnews.com...

"Anthony Jones" wrote:

I understand that using the TYPELIB is more costly than
adovbs.inc (or equivalent) at runtime, but that would seem
to be true whether you put it directly in your script or
in the global.asa, wouldn't it?

I'm surprised to hear that. I would have thought the use of
adovbs.inc was more expensive but I've never really looked
into.

Judge for yourself:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/ar...22/430881.aspx

A very interesting series of articles, thanks.

In particular, note Eric's acknowledgement that we often trade performance
for ease of use. I have absolutely no problem throwing ADO and CDO TYPELIB
declarations in my application roots because I never know A PRIORI

if/where

I will need them.

Ok I can see that point of view also make sense.