On Sep 23, 4:29*pm, "Chris O'C via AccessMonster.com" <u29189@uwe>
wrote:
The problem isn't your pc. *The Google programmers sometimes work on the
Google Group web pages, but they put it back the way it was when they're
finished testing. *If the web pages are messed up, use a different interface
while they're testing. *Many other sites post your messages to this same
group.
Here's one of them with today's posts:
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...ms-access/2008...
Chris
Microsoft MVP
Are you promoting AccessMonster?, I note that AccessMonster displays
two posts (Can we use dynamic queries on SQL-SERVER without ADO and
without a persistent ODBC Connection?) I recently made in CDMA. These
were not made in response to a post in AccessMonster, nor has anyone
from AccessMonster responded to them. In fact, the whole thread is
comprised of my two posts only.
I'm looking for an indication in AccessMonster that these posts
originated in CDMA, were not intended for AccessMonster, and have
nothing to do with AccessMonster. I can't find any such indication.
Why? It's one thing to post public messages. It's another thing not to
credit them. Would someone not familiar with newsgroups, CDMA, and
AccessMonster think that these posts had been made to AccessMonster? I
believe he/she could. Might that encourage him/her to register as a
member with AccessMonster?
Moving right along I find that to respond to my CDMA post in
AccessMonster I must register! The implication is that AccessMonster
now controls the ideas that I have posted.
I think this is unethical and I think that you should NOT promote
AccessMonster here in CDMA.