Hi Tim,
Thank you for your explanation. BTW, when I say Access Sql I mean Jet.
I am using the Expressions interchangeably - since Jet is mostly
associated with Access.
Also, for everyone's information, I happen to really appreciate this
forum. I started my Microsoft programming career in this forum 11 years
ago. I have been trying to keep up with the times by learning OOP,
..Net, Sql Server, etc. My goal is to exchange information to gain
information, knowledge, and so forth. I do not or have nor ever
professed to be comepletely knowledgbeable in all aspects of a
subject/technology, i.e. Sql, Access, .net. Thus, I post in this forum.
I did not happen to know how to write a JET sql statement for Updating
using join tables. I admit it. I did not know how to do that even
though I have written way more sophisticated queries in Tsql. And it
turns out that the Access query builder writes this sql with the
greatest of ease such that someone just starting out with Access can
write such a query.
I have no desire to alienate anybody in this group. I read a lot of the
posts and have seen all sorts of disruptive people (I think they are
called trolls), who harrass other people here. I am not one of those
people and don't plan to become one. I may know a little bit more about
one aspect of Access than someone else, but obviously there are people
with way less time in grade with Access that know more about other
fundamental aspects of Access (Jet) than I do - like writing update
queries using Joined tables.
Just so I have it straight, my idea of participating in this forum is to
exchange/discuss information about Access/Jet/programming. Sometimes my
information is on the money, and sometimes it is skewed. If I feel that
my information may be skewed I will state that I don't know for sure if
this is how a thing is.
Quick note on where I come from on my line of thinking: I started
database programming with DBase3+ in the mid 80s (I was just a youngster
at the time). DBase3+ was the rage back then. Then came Rbase which
took Dbase3+ to the next level - pretty good for DOS based systems.
Then came Windows 3.1 and Access - which just blew everything out of the
water in database programming. Access single handedly revolutionized DB
programming. But along comes Sql Server and .Net to take Access to the
next level. Whenever I mention .Net stuff, I am just keeping up with
the times. We have to face the facts of life. Technologies will always
be getting upgraded and completely revamped. It is the nature of the
beast.
Even though .Net and sql Server are overtaking Access in the Enterprise
arena, since desktops will be around for years to come, Access will live
on - unlike DBase (at the desktop level that is). I think DB2 is
exclusively server/mainframe based. I don't believe Access will ever
see any significant competition in the desktop RDBMS market. Access has
already conquered that market. The competition is at the Enterprise
level. I just don't think any company would be foolish enough to try to
create a BETTER RDBMS for desktops.
For a file application, Access is quite vast in its reaches, and I
certainly don't have familiarity with every one of those reaches - and
even some of the fundamental ones. So I exchange information in this
forum in hopes of getting the information that I don't have. For
example, because of this thread I now know how to write a Jet Sql Update
query using Joined tables.
Thank you to all participants for your participation.
Rich
*** Sent via Developersdex
http://www.developersdex.com ***