473,659 Members | 2,690 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Front Ends on shared XP Professional boxes

My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I have
several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both versions, and I
have the users run .bat files that make a folder in the C:\ root
directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that folder and put a
shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine, except that when the
clerical users are backing up a peer (and using the peer's XP box
instead of their own), they get a message that the FE file is read-only.
The FEs make temporary queries and local tables in some routines, so
this could prevent them from working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the file
attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch commands to
change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I can think of
off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which doesn't seem
sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve the problem). Has
anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?

TIA.

--
Please remove the under_scores if replying by mail.
Nov 13 '05 #1
30 1500
Do your users log into Win XP with administrative rights, or as a regular
user?

It may be that they do not have full permissions for:
- the folder where the batch file is installing the FE, or
- the network share where the back end is, or
- the folder where system.mdw is.

--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.

"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:bq******** ************@br esnan.com...
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I have
several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both versions, and I
have the users run .bat files that make a folder in the C:\ root
directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that folder and put a
shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine, except that when the
clerical users are backing up a peer (and using the peer's XP box
instead of their own), they get a message that the FE file is read-only.
The FEs make temporary queries and local tables in some routines, so
this could prevent them from working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the file
attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch commands to
change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I can think of
off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which doesn't seem
sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve the problem). Has
anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?

Nov 13 '05 #2
Allen Browne <Al*********@Se eSig.Invalid> wrote:
Do your users log into Win XP with administrative rights, or as a
regular user?

It may be that they do not have full permissions for:
- the folder where the batch file is installing the FE, or
- the network share where the back end is, or
- the folder where system.mdw is.
They log in as regular users as far as XP is concerned. I'm pretty sure
it's the folder where the FE is that's the problem (I looked at the same
folder on my machine and it only has full permissions for me and
administrators) . The shortcut the batch puts on their start menu points
to an .mdw on the network, and the users have full permissions on that
folder and the folders where the BEs live.
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:bq******** ************@br esnan.com...
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I
have several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both
versions, and I have the users run .bat files that make a folder in
the C:\ root directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that
folder and put a shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine,
except that when the clerical users are backing up a peer (and
using the peer's XP box instead of their own), they get a message
that the FE file is read-only. The FEs make temporary queries and
local tables in some routines, so this could prevent them from
working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the
file attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch
commands to change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I
can think of off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which
doesn't seem sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve
the problem). Has anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?


--
Please remove the under_scores if replying by mail.
Nov 13 '05 #3
Each user will need Administrative rights to the shared PC. Under My
Computer, right click, and you will see a menu item "Manage" ...

Unfortunately, I'm at my Windows 98 machine, and I don't exactly recall
where it is in the Management section, but *somewhere* in there is a place
where you assign permissions to the PC.

Darryl Kerekslager
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:7e******** ************@br esnan.com...
Allen Browne <Al*********@Se eSig.Invalid> wrote:
Do your users log into Win XP with administrative rights, or as a
regular user?

It may be that they do not have full permissions for:
- the folder where the batch file is installing the FE, or
- the network share where the back end is, or
- the folder where system.mdw is.
They log in as regular users as far as XP is concerned. I'm pretty sure
it's the folder where the FE is that's the problem (I looked at the same
folder on my machine and it only has full permissions for me and
administrators) . The shortcut the batch puts on their start menu points
to an .mdw on the network, and the users have full permissions on that
folder and the folders where the BEs live.
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:bq******** ************@br esnan.com...
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I
have several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both
versions, and I have the users run .bat files that make a folder in
the C:\ root directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that
folder and put a shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine,
except that when the clerical users are backing up a peer (and
using the peer's XP box instead of their own), they get a message
that the FE file is read-only. The FEs make temporary queries and
local tables in some routines, so this could prevent them from
working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the
file attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch
commands to change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I
can think of off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which
doesn't seem sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve
the problem). Has anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?


--
Please remove the under_scores if replying by mail.

Nov 13 '05 #4
"Darryl Kerkeslager" <Ke*********@co mcast.net> wrote:
Each user will need Administrative rights to the shared PC. Under My
Computer, right click, and you will see a menu item "Manage" ...


No, no. In an ideal world users should never be administrators. All software
should be designed to be run as regular users. Unfortunately many of the developers,
including myself, run as administrators and thus are the major cause of this problem.

Running as administrator opens the door for malicious software much wider.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Nov 13 '05 #5
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote:
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional , along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I have
several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both versions, and I
have the users run .bat files that make a folder in the C:\ root
directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that folder and put a
shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine, except that when the
clerical users are backing up a peer (and using the peer's XP box
instead of their own), they get a message that the FE file is read-only.
The FEs make temporary queries and local tables in some routines, so
this could prevent them from working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the file
attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch commands to
change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I can think of
off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which doesn't seem
sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve the problem). Has
anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?


From the limited research I've done on this topic such should be installed in the
users Documents and Settings folders. Some possible folders could be one of the
following environment variables:
ALLUSERSPROFILE =C:\Documents and Settings\All Users
APPDATA=C:\Docu ments and Settings\ttoews \Application Data
HOMEPATH=\Docum ents and Settings\ttoews
and subfolders there of of course.

From what I can recall every other folder is locked down when running as a user on a
Windows XP NTFS system. Also regular users can't create folders off the root
either.

Also note that I specifically created the Auto FE Updater utility so that I could
make changes to the FE MDE as often as I wanted and be quite confident that the next
time someone went to run the app that it would pull in the latest version. For more
info on the errors or the Auto FE Updater utility see the free Auto FE Updater
utility at http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/autofe.htm at my website to keep the FE on
each PC up to date.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Nov 13 '05 #6
I solved this problem by using a vbscript to have each user install
the fe in their own profile:

dim wShell
dim strPathToInstal l
dim strShortCutInst all
dim objShortcut
dim fso

const PATHTOINSTALLPO INT = "pathtnetworkin stallpoint"

const PROGRAMTOINSTAL L = "somerogram.mdb "

set wShell = wscript.createo bject("wscrpt.s hell")

strPathToInstal l = wShell.specialf olders("MyDocum ents")
'the baove drops into my documents, you could put
'whereever you want

strShortCutInst all = wShell.specialf olders("Program s")

set fso = wscript.createo bject("scriptin g.filesystemobj ect")

fso.copyfile PATHTOINSTALLPO INT & PROGRAMTOINSTAL L,strPathToInst all &
"\",true

set fso = nothing

set objShortcut = wShell.createsh ortcut(strShort CutInstall & "\" &
PROGRAMTOINSTAL L & ".lnk")

objShortcut.tar getpath = strPathToInstal l & "\" & PROGRAMTOINSTAL L

objShortcut.win dowstyle = 1

objShortcut.sav e

set objShortcut = nothing

set wShell = nothing

"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message news:<7e******* *************@b resnan.com>...
Allen Browne <Al*********@Se eSig.Invalid> wrote:
Do your users log into Win XP with administrative rights, or as a
regular user?

It may be that they do not have full permissions for:
- the folder where the batch file is installing the FE, or
- the network share where the back end is, or
- the folder where system.mdw is.
They log in as regular users as far as XP is concerned. I'm pretty sure
it's the folder where the FE is that's the problem (I looked at the same
folder on my machine and it only has full permissions for me and
administrators) . The shortcut the batch puts on their start menu points
to an .mdw on the network, and the users have full permissions on that
folder and the folders where the BEs live.
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:bq******** ************@br esnan.com...
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I
have several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both
versions, and I have the users run .bat files that make a folder in
the C:\ root directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that
folder and put a shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine,
except that when the clerical users are backing up a peer (and
using the peer's XP box instead of their own), they get a message
that the FE file is read-only. The FEs make temporary queries and
local tables in some routines, so this could prevent them from
working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the
file attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch
commands to change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I
can think of off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which
doesn't seem sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve
the problem). Has anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?

Nov 13 '05 #7
Tony Toews <tt****@teluspl anet.net> wrote:
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote:
My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I
have several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both
versions, and I have the users run .bat files that make a folder in
the C:\ root directory, copy the FEs from the file server to that
folder and put a shortcut on the start menu. All is working fine,
except that when the clerical users are backing up a peer (and
using the peer's XP box instead of their own), they get a message
that the FE file is read-only. The FEs make temporary queries and
local tables in some routines, so this could prevent them from
working.

As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the
file attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch
commands to change file or folder permissions, and the only thing I
can think of off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP folder, which
doesn't seem sensible to me (and I'm not even sure if it'd solve
the problem). Has anyone here found an easy solution to this issue?


From the limited research I've done on this topic such should be
installed in the users Documents and Settings folders. Some
possible folders could be one of the following environment variables:
ALLUSERSPROFILE =C:\Documents and Settings\All Users
APPDATA=C:\Docu ments and Settings\ttoews \Application Data
HOMEPATH=\Docum ents and Settings\ttoews
and subfolders there of of course.
The first iteration of my batch tried to put the shortcut file into the
ALLUSERSPROFILE start menu -- I figured that would simplify things when
one user logged on to another user's box. Some of the users succeeded in
putting the shortcut there, others didn't (permissions error, IIRC), so
I rewrote the .bat file to put the shortcut in the current user's
profile start menu instead. I thought about putting the .mdb in the
Documents and Settings folder, but that's typically pointed to the
user's folder on the file server (which, since a server consolidation
project a few months ago, is located hundreds of miles from most of my
users).
From what I can recall every other folder is locked down when
running as a user on a Windows XP NTFS system. Also regular users
can't create folders off the root either.
FWIW, the batch didn't have any trouble creating a C:\DBs folder for any
of my users, and they're all regular users. Of course, the default
security settings at my company could certainly have non-standard
configurations.
Also note that I specifically created the Auto FE Updater utility so
that I could make changes to the FE MDE as often as I wanted and be
quite confident that the next time someone went to run the app that
it would pull in the latest version. For more info on the errors or
the Auto FE Updater utility see the free Auto FE Updater utility at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/autofe.htm at my website to keep the
FE on each PC up to date.
I've looked at it but haven't gotten around to testing it in my
environment.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm


--
Please remove the under_scores if replying by mail.
Nov 13 '05 #8
Dan Morgan <us****@yahoo.c om> wrote:
I solved this problem by using a vbscript to have each user install
the fe in their own profile:

dim wShell
dim strPathToInstal l
dim strShortCutInst all
dim objShortcut
dim fso

const PATHTOINSTALLPO INT = "pathtnetworkin stallpoint"

const PROGRAMTOINSTAL L = "somerogram.mdb "

set wShell = wscript.createo bject("wscrpt.s hell")

strPathToInstal l = wShell.specialf olders("MyDocum ents")
'the baove drops into my documents, you could put
'whereever you want

strShortCutInst all = wShell.specialf olders("Program s")

set fso = wscript.createo bject("scriptin g.filesystemobj ect")

fso.copyfile PATHTOINSTALLPO INT & PROGRAMTOINSTAL L,strPathToInst all &
"\",true

set fso = nothing

set objShortcut = wShell.createsh ortcut(strShort CutInstall & "\" &
PROGRAMTOINSTAL L & ".lnk")

objShortcut.tar getpath = strPathToInstal l & "\" & PROGRAMTOINSTAL L

objShortcut.win dowstyle = 1

objShortcut.sav e

set objShortcut = nothing

set wShell = nothing

Thanks Dan, I've saved a copy of this script. Unfortunately, in my
company the My Documents folder points to the user's folder on the file
server rather than the user's C: drive. If the file servers were local
to the users, that may still provide adequate performance, but most of
my users are hundreds of miles from their file servers since a server
consolidation project a few months ago.

"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
news:<7e******* *************@b resnan.com>...
Allen Browne <Al*********@Se eSig.Invalid> wrote:
> Do your users log into Win XP with administrative rights, or as a
> regular user?
>
> It may be that they do not have full permissions for:
> - the folder where the batch file is installing the FE, or
> - the network share where the back end is, or
> - the folder where system.mdw is.

They log in as regular users as far as XP is concerned. I'm pretty
sure it's the folder where the FE is that's the problem (I looked
at the same folder on my machine and it only has full permissions
for me and administrators) . The shortcut the batch puts on their
start menu points to an .mdw on the network, and the users have
full permissions on that folder and the folders where the BEs live.

> "Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote in message
> news:bq******** ************@br esnan.com...
>> My company is in the process of updating PCs from NT4 to XP
>> Professional, along with moving from Office 97 to Office 2002. I
>> have several Access databases with FE .mdb/.mde files in both
>> versions, and I have the users run .bat files that make a folder
>> in the C:\ root directory, copy the FEs from the file server to
>> that folder and put a shortcut on the start menu. All is working
>> fine, except that when the clerical users are backing up a peer
>> (and using the peer's XP box instead of their own), they get a
>> message that the FE file is read-only. The FEs make temporary
>> queries and local tables in some routines, so this could prevent
>> them from working.
>>
>> As near as I can tell, it's a folder/file permissions issue (the
>> file attributes don't indicate RO). I haven't found any batch
>> commands to change file or folder permissions, and the only
>> thing I can think of off-hand is to copy the FEs to the TEMP
>> folder, which doesn't seem sensible to me (and I'm not even sure
>> if it'd solve the problem). Has anyone here found an easy
>> solution to this issue?


--
Please remove the under_scores if replying by mail.
Nov 13 '05 #9
"Roald Oines" <r_*******@bres nan.net> wrote:
Unfortunatel y, in my
company the My Documents folder points to the user's folder on the file
server rather than the user's C: drive. If the file servers were local
to the users, that may still provide adequate performance, but most of
my users are hundreds of miles from their file servers since a server
consolidation project a few months ago.

Same here. I understand Tony's point that granting Admin rights may not be
the tightest security, but, it does solve the problem.
Darryl Kerkeslager
Nov 13 '05 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

12
9893
by: Corey Burnett | last post by:
I have a client that has a split database (front-end/back-end). They are also using Access security - MDW file. The front end MDE file, the back end MDB file, and the MDW file are all located on a shared folder on the file server. They have two populations of users - local and remote. *ALL* users currently get to the system via a Citrix login. They log in to Citrix and get a Citrix desktop. Then they start the application via a...
4
1614
by: Tempy | last post by:
I am not a programmer, but love to dabble with VBA, mainly in Excel, but I have made an Access data base which is getting a bit outa hand for me!! I am using it to display information only; as a project report. I have three sections that I must report on, namely: General information Purchasing issues & Quality issues.
49
14324
by: Yannick Turgeon | last post by:
Hello, We are in the process of examining our current main application. We have to do some major changes and, in the process, are questionning/validating the use of MS Access as front-end. The application is relatively big: around 200 tables, 200 forms and sub-forms, 150 queries and 150 repports, 5GB of data (SQL Server 2000), 40 users. I'm wondering what are the disadvantages of using Access as front-end? Other that it's not...
35
2545
by: robert d via AccessMonster.com | last post by:
I was asked to provide a proposal. I provided a proposal on my application and the prospective client likes what I have but is wary of it having been developed in Access. I don't understand this concern since my front-end application will be linked to a SQL SERVER backend. But there seems to be this "conventional wisdom" among IT people that Access is a toy database. Okay, let's redefine that as "Jet" is a toy database (which I don't...
20
1843
by: dalmond | last post by:
What started out as a simple dispatching log has now turned into a complete Security Department Databse...sorta. I thank many many people who shared their knowledge to help me accomplish what I've done. Everything that is generated in our department, service calls, reports, property inventory, etc is based off of a number generated from the dispatch database. Because of that, I have been able to incorporate different tasks, all in the...
11
4693
by: Max Vit | last post by:
I have deployed few Access apps splitting it in Front End and Back End. Our environment uses Win XP SP2 for clients, Win 2k3 for servers and Access 2003. The max. number of clients is about 50 (concurrent users is estimated around 10). Whilst the Back End always lives on a server, I am not quite clear where the Front End should live. I have searched the web and find contradicting views.
13
4915
by: Dave | last post by:
I work at a small private company that has been using VB 6.0 as a front end for Access databases for 8 years. It looks as though we will be migrating to Vista in the not-too-distant future. My hope is to move to RealBasic at that point. Does anyone know about RB connecting to Access tables via ADO? I was reading some archived RB posts and someone wrote that RB doesn't connect to Access. That was from a 2004 post. Is that (still)...
10
11417
Khriskin
by: Khriskin | last post by:
As a warning, I'm self-taught so I have a bad habit of brute-forcing things out of ignorance. I've done some searching online and haven't found a solution, so I figured it couldn't hurt to ask you kind folks if there was a better alternative. PROBLEM I have multiple front ends that are updated on an almost daily basis as needs change (or I find problems). I need an easy way to push out new local copies of the front ends to multiple...
14
9432
by: Brian Nelson | last post by:
Sorry for the long post, I've tried so hard to solve this one but I'm just stuck! We've had a multiuser .mdb file on a network share for years. I know it's not ideal, but it's worked well from Access 2000 to 2003. Ever since we upgraded to 2007, we've noticed some serious bloating. When we were on 2003, after a fresh compact, the database would be at about 20 MB. After normal use it would grow to about 25 MB and then significantly...
0
8427
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
8332
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
8851
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
8525
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
7356
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
0
5649
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4175
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
1
2750
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
2
1737
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.