efficient text file search.

[noro]

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

?

BTW:
does "for line in f: " read a block of line to te memory or is it
simply calls f.readline() many times?

thanks
amit

[Luuk]

"noro" <am******@gmail.comschreef in bericht
news:11**********************@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

yes, more efficient would be:
grep (http://www.gnu.org/software/grep/)

[noro]

:)

via python...

Luuk wrote:

"noro" <am******@gmail.comschreef in bericht
news:11**********************@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

yes, more efficient would be:
grep (http://www.gnu.org/software/grep/)

[Luuk]

"noro" <am******@gmail.comschreef in bericht
news:11********************@h48g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com...

:)

via python...

Luuk wrote:

>"noro" <am******@gmail.comschreef in bericht
news:11**********************@h48g2000cwc.googleg roups.com...

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

yes, more efficient would be:
grep (http://www.gnu.org/software/grep/)

ok, a more serious answer:

some googling turned op the following.
Second paragraph of chapter 14 of http://www.amk.ca/python/2.1/

a.. The speed of line-oriented file I/O has been improved because people
often complain about its lack of speed, and because it's often been used as
a naïve benchmark. The readline() method of file objects has therefore been
rewritten to be much faster. The exact amount of the speedup will vary from
platform to platform depending on how slow the C library's getc() was, but
is around 66%, and potentially much faster on some particular operating
systems. Tim Peters did much of the benchmarking and coding for this change,
motivated by a discussion in comp.lang.python.
A new module and method for file objects was also added, contributed by Jeff
Epler. The new method, xreadlines(), is similar to the existing xrange()
built-in. xreadlines() returns an opaque sequence object that only supports
being iterated over, reading a line on every iteration but not reading the
entire file into memory as the existing readlines() method does. You'd use
it like this:
for line in sys.stdin.xreadlines():
# ... do something for each line ...
...
For a fuller discussion of the line I/O changes, see the python-dev summary
for January 1-15, 2001 at http://www.amk.ca/python/dev/2001-01-1.html.

[Kent Johnson]

noro wrote:

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

Probably better to read the whole file at once if it isn't too big:
f = file('somefile')
data = f.read()
if 'string' in data:
print 'FOUND'

[Ant]

noro wrote:

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

break
^^^
Add a 'break' after the print statement - that way you won't have to
read the entire file unless the string isn't there. That's probably not
the sort of advice you're after though :-)

Can't see why reading the entire file in as the other poster suggested
would help, and seeing as "for line in f:" is now regarded as the
pythonic way of working with lines of text in a file, then I'd assume
that the implementation would be at least as fast as "for line in
f.xreadlines(): "

[John Machin]

Luuk wrote:
[snip]

some googling turned op the following.
Second paragraph of chapter 14 of http://www.amk.ca/python/2.1/

[snip]

For a fuller discussion of the line I/O changes, see the python-dev summary
for January 1-15, 2001 at http://www.amk.ca/python/dev/2001-01-1.html.

That is *HISTORY*. That is Python 2.1. That is the year 2001.
xreadlines is as dead as a dodo.

[Luuk]

"John Machin" <sj******@lexicon.netschreef in bericht
news:11**********************@d34g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...

>
Luuk wrote:
[snip]

>some googling turned op the following.
Second paragraph of chapter 14 of http://www.amk.ca/python/2.1/

[snip]

>For a fuller discussion of the line I/O changes, see the python-dev
summary
for January 1-15, 2001 at http://www.amk.ca/python/dev/2001-01-1.html.

That is *HISTORY*. That is Python 2.1. That is the year 2001.
xreadlines is as dead as a dodo.

Thats's why i started my reply with:
"some googling turned op the following."
i did not state that further googling was unneeded ;-)

[George Sakkis]

noro wrote:

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

?

Is this something you want to do only once for a given file ? The
replies so far seem to imply so and in this case I doubt that you can
do anything more efficient. OTOH, if the same file is to be searched
repeatedly for different strings, an appropriate indexing scheme can
speed things up considerably on average.

George

[noro]

OK, am not sure why, but

fList=file('somefile').read()
if fList.find('string') != -1:
print 'FOUND'

works much much faster.

it is strange since i thought 'for line in file('somefile')' is
optemized and read pages to the memory,
i guess not..

George Sakkis wrote:

noro wrote:

Is there a more efficient method to find a string in a text file then:

f=file('somefile')
for line in f:
if 'string' in line:
print 'FOUND'

?

Is this something you want to do only once for a given file ? The
replies so far seem to imply so and in this case I doubt that you can
do anything more efficient. OTOH, if the same file is to be searched
repeatedly for different strings, an appropriate indexing scheme can
speed things up considerably on average.

George

[Sion Arrowsmith]

noro <am******@gmail.comwrote:

>OK, am not sure why, but

fList=file('somefile').read()
if fList.find('string') != -1:
print 'FOUND'

works much much faster.

it is strange since i thought 'for line in file('somefile')' is
optemized and read pages to the memory,

Step back and think about what each is doing at a high level of
description: file.read reads the contents of the file into memory
in one go, end of story. file.[x]readlines reads (some or all of)
the contents of the file into memeory, does a linear searches on it
for end of line characters, and copies out the line(s) into some
new bits of memory. Line-by-line processing has a *lot* more work
to do (unless you're read()ing a really big file which is going to
make heavy demands on memory allocation) and it should be no
surprise that it's slower.

--
\S -- si***@chiark.greenend.org.uk -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
___ | "Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
\X/ | -- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump