By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
440,171 Members | 776 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 440,171 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

I knew there was an mystery to it !

P: n/a

Back then - in particular, soon after 9/11 - I evidenced the natural irony of
the standard python implementation, by showing it had the clear and
spontaneous humor of replying :


when asked the convoluted question :

filter(lambda W : W not in "ILLITERATE", "BULLSHIT")

Now at first sight, it was clear I could attribute it to unexpectedly cosmic
dimensions taken by the BDFL's "time machine" effect over Python, when applied
to the time-shattering event that was 9/11.

OTOH, this was an inelegantly public-resource-seizing viz the lawful Python
community and its BDFL. Not to speak of 9/11 grieving ones. So that idea fell
off my hands.

My live mind kept expecting a deeper mystery, though, to the above Python
formula. I found it out, by discovering that their was a clearly brilliant
competitor explanation, to examine for contrast and completion :

Original Python responded


when asked the convoluted question :

filter(lambda W : W not in "ILLITERATE", "BULLSHIT")

in particular, soon after 9/11

because in particular
Python was a language designed with the idea that suffice two scopes,
one local, and one global !

Now, Python is past that.


So it appears, is Bush.

Conservation ! Diagonal Invariant ! Discovery ! Euręka !

to-me-it-looks-like-EPR-ly yours,

Mori Squared
Jul 18 '05 #1
Share this question for a faster answer!
Share on Google+

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.