473,417 Members | 1,331 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,417 software developers and data experts.

How to use __getattribute__ to access a class attribute?

I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.

I thought I could just use __getattribute__ for this purpose.
This works fine if I already have an instantiation of the class,
but not when I try this on the class object directly.

A bare bones example:
class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

It works for a instantiation of class C:
x = C()
x.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> x.__getattribute__('a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> x.__getattribute__('a')() static method a

But for the class object it works differently:
C.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <staticmethod object at 0x00AC6A10> C.a() static method a C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#219>", line 1, in -toplevel-
C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable

After some experimentation and documentation searching,
I found that to get at the actual function, the __get__
method for the staticmethod descriptor must be called:
C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C) <function a at 0x00A981B0> C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C)() static method a

If I use an class instance as the first argument
it works OK. But I ran into this problem when I tried
to use __getattribute__ in the __new__ function of a class
-- there is no class instance yet at that point,
and calling C() there leads to infinite recursion.

Another variant that worked is to call __getattribute__
on the metaclass:
type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a')()

static method a

But according to section 3.3.2.1 of the Language Reference
(More attribute access for new-style classes),
__getattribute__ "... should return the (computed) attribute value".
This could be interpreted to say that __getattribute__ should
return the function, not the staticmethod object.

Is there a reason for this difference in behavior?

Jul 18 '05 #1
6 3597
Perhaps it might be easier if you made your own static method object:
class MyStaticMethod(object): .... def __call__(self):
.... print "static method a"
.... def __get__(self, cls, inst):
.... return self.__call__
.... class C(object): .... a = MyStaticMethod() C.a <bound method MyStaticMethod.__call__ of <__main__.MyStaticMethod object at
0x00E57390>> C.a() static method a C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <__main__.MyStaticMethod object at 0x00E57390> C.__getattribute__(C,'a')() static method a c = C()
c.a() static method a C.__getattribute__(c,'a') <bound method MyStaticMethod.__call__ of <__main__.MyStaticMethod object at
0x00E57390>> C.__getattribute__(c,'a')()
static method a

As far as your question goes, __getattribute__ is following the "... should
return the (computed) attribute value" rule for retrieving the static method
object... unfortunatly the calculated value in this case is a reference to
the static method object rather then the __get__ method bound to the static
method object.

HTH

Chris

"Ruud de Jong" <ru**********@consunet.nl> wrote in message
news:40**********************@dreader2.news.tiscal i.nl...
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.

I thought I could just use __getattribute__ for this purpose.
This works fine if I already have an instantiation of the class,
but not when I try this on the class object directly.

A bare bones example:
>>> class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

It works for a instantiation of class C:
>>> x = C()
>>> x.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a')() static method a

But for the class object it works differently:
>>> C.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <staticmethod object at 0x00AC6A10> >>> C.a() static method a >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#219>", line 1, in -toplevel-
C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable

After some experimentation and documentation searching,
I found that to get at the actual function, the __get__
method for the staticmethod descriptor must be called:
>>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C) <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C)() static method a

If I use an class instance as the first argument
it works OK. But I ran into this problem when I tried
to use __getattribute__ in the __new__ function of a class
-- there is no class instance yet at that point,
and calling C() there leads to infinite recursion.

Another variant that worked is to call __getattribute__
on the metaclass:
>>> type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a')()

static method a

But according to section 3.3.2.1 of the Language Reference
(More attribute access for new-style classes),
__getattribute__ "... should return the (computed) attribute value".
This could be interpreted to say that __getattribute__ should
return the function, not the staticmethod object.

Is there a reason for this difference in behavior?

Jul 18 '05 #2
Ruud de Jong <ru**********@consunet.nl> wrote in message news:<40**********************@dreader2.news.tisca li.nl>...
Ruud de Jong wrote:
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.
If what you're trying to do is get C.a (where C is the class and a is
the name of the staticmethod) but all you have is the class C and a
string mname = "a", then just getattr(C, mname) should work. Generally
this works for any attribute access where you have the attribute name
in another variable.

Another way to get the naked function, which also works for
classmethods, is to do C.__dict__['a']. See comments below that
explain what you see.
I thought I could just use __getattribute__ for this purpose.
This works fine if I already have an instantiation of the class,
but not when I try this on the class object directly.

A bare bones example:
>>> class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

It works for a instantiation of class C:
>>> x = C()
>>> x.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a')() static method a
When Python comes across x.a, it doesn't call x.__getattribute__('a'),
it calls type(x).__getattribute__(x, 'a'). Now type(x) is C, and it
just so happens (in this case) that x.__getattribute__ also ends up
calling the same method, since x doesn't have a __getattribute__ of
its own. This is why what you do above works.
But for the class object it works differently:
>>> C.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <staticmethod object at 0x00AC6A10> >>> C.a() static method a >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()


Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#219>", line 1, in -toplevel-
C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable


To repeat the same experiment, you should call
type(C).__getattribute__(C, 'a'). Note that in this case C *has* its
own __getattribute__ attribute (which is meant for instances of C, not
C itself). In fact you do this later, and it works. Hmm, at first
glance I'd expect what you do above to return an exception if passed C
instead of an instance of C (like any other well behaved method). I
don't know why that doesn't happen.

In conclusion, __getattribute__() does return the computed attribute
value, but for an object o it is called on type(o) and not o itself.
Also, getattr() is usually all you need.

HTH,
Shalabh
Jul 18 '05 #3
Ruud de Jong wrote:
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.
If what you're trying to do is get C.a (where C is the class and a is
the name of the staticmethod) but all you have is the class C and a
string mname = "a", then just getattr(C, mname) should work. Generally
this works for any attribute access where you have the attribute name in
another variable.

Another way to get the naked function, which also works for
classmethods, is to do C.__dict__['a']. See comments below that explain
what you see.
I thought I could just use __getattribute__ for this purpose.
This works fine if I already have an instantiation of the class,
but not when I try this on the class object directly.

A bare bones example:
>>> class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

It works for a instantiation of class C:
>>> x = C()
>>> x.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a')() static method a
When Python comes across x.a, it doesn't call x.__getattribute__('a'),
it calls type(x).__getattribute__(x, 'a'). Now type(x) is C, and it just
so happens (in this case) that x.__getattribute__ also ends up calling
the same method, since x doesn't have a __getattribute__ of its own.
This is why what you do above works.
But for the class object it works differently:
>>> C.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <staticmethod object at 0x00AC6A10> >>> C.a() static method a >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()


Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#219>", line 1, in -toplevel-
C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable


To repeat the same experiment, you should call
type(C).__getattribute__(C, 'a'). Note that in this case C *has* its own
__getattribute__ attribute (which is meant for instances of C, not C
itself). In fact you do this later, and it works. Hmm, at first glance
I'd expect what you do above to return an exception if passed C instead
of an instance of C (like any other well behaved method). I don't know
why that doesn't happen.

In conclusion, __getattribute__() does return the computed attribute
value, but for an object o it is called on the type(o) and not o itself.
Also, getattr() is usually all you need.

HTH,
Shalabh

Jul 18 '05 #4
Ivo
A good read you can find : www.diveintopython.com

"Ruud de Jong" <ru**********@consunet.nl> wrote in message
news:40**********************@dreader2.news.tiscal i.nl...
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.

I thought I could just use __getattribute__ for this purpose.
This works fine if I already have an instantiation of the class,
but not when I try this on the class object directly.

A bare bones example:
>>> class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

It works for a instantiation of class C:
>>> x = C()
>>> x.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> x.__getattribute__('a')() static method a

But for the class object it works differently:
>>> C.a <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a') <staticmethod object at 0x00AC6A10> >>> C.a() static method a >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#219>", line 1, in -toplevel-
C.__getattribute__(C,'a')()
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable

After some experimentation and documentation searching,
I found that to get at the actual function, the __get__
method for the staticmethod descriptor must be called:
>>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C) <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> C.__getattribute__(C,'a').__get__(None, C)() static method a

If I use an class instance as the first argument
it works OK. But I ran into this problem when I tried
to use __getattribute__ in the __new__ function of a class
-- there is no class instance yet at that point,
and calling C() there leads to infinite recursion.

Another variant that worked is to call __getattribute__
on the metaclass:
>>> type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a') <function a at 0x00A981B0> >>> type(C).__getattribute__(C,'a')()

static method a

But according to section 3.3.2.1 of the Language Reference
(More attribute access for new-style classes),
__getattribute__ "... should return the (computed) attribute value".
This could be interpreted to say that __getattribute__ should
return the function, not the staticmethod object.

Is there a reason for this difference in behavior?

Jul 18 '05 #5
Shalabh Chaturvedi schreef:
Ruud de Jong wrote:
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.

If what you're trying to do is get C.a (where C is the class and a is
the name of the staticmethod) but all you have is the class C and a
string mname = "a", then just getattr(C, mname) should work. Generally
this works for any attribute access where you have the attribute name in
another variable.


Erh, hmm, rrriight... Built-in functions. <blush/>
Completely forgot about that one -- too focussed
on trying to do everything with object methods and such.
I really need to pay more attention to those built-in functions.

Well, that solves my immediate problem.
I knew there had to be a simple solution :-)

Another way to get the naked function, which also works for
classmethods, is to do C.__dict__['a']. See comments below that explain
what you see.
Well, that's not true, at least not on my system (XP, Python 2.3.3):
class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

C.__dict__['a']

<staticmethod object at 0x00AADD10>
[snipped] To repeat the same experiment, you should call
type(C).__getattribute__(C, 'a'). Note that in this case C *has* its own
__getattribute__ attribute (which is meant for instances of C, not C
itself).
C did not have its own __getattribute__ method. It inherited it
from object.

I still find this whole thing slightly ambiguous.
A class C is itself an object, an instance of 'type',
just as x = C() leads to x being an instance of class C.
But x.__getattribute__ and C.__getattribute__ return
different objects.
In fact you do this later, and it works. Hmm, at first glance
I'd expect what you do above to return an exception if passed C instead
of an instance of C (like any other well behaved method). I don't know
why that doesn't happen.


I would also have expected an exception. The strange thing, as I see
it, is that x.__getattribute__ and type(C).__getattribute__ both give
the correct result, but that C.__getattribute__ *almost* gives the
correct result, but stops at calling the __get__ function on the
desciptor object.

Anyway, now that you've kindly reminded me of the existance of getattr,
I'll not spend any more time trying to understand this.

Thanks,

Ruud

Jul 18 '05 #6
Ruud de Jong wrote:
Shalabh Chaturvedi schreef:
Ruud de Jong wrote:
I have the situation where I need to construct the name
of a static method, and then retrieve the corresponding
function from a class object.
If what you're trying to do is get C.a (where C is the class and a is
the name of the staticmethod) but all you have is the class C and a
string mname = "a", then just getattr(C, mname) should work. Generally
this works for any attribute access where you have the attribute name
in another variable.

Erh, hmm, rrriight... Built-in functions. <blush/>
Completely forgot about that one -- too focussed
on trying to do everything with object methods and such.
I really need to pay more attention to those built-in functions.

Well, that solves my immediate problem.
I knew there had to be a simple solution :-)

Another way to get the naked function, which also works for
classmethods, is to do C.__dict__['a']. See comments below that
explain what you see.

Well, that's not true, at least not on my system (XP, Python 2.3.3):
>>> class C(object): def a():
print "static method a"
a = staticmethod(a)

>>> C.__dict__['a'] <staticmethod object at 0x00AADD10>
> [snipped]


Sorry, my mistake. In fact it doesn't work for even classmethods. Only
for functions.
To repeat the same experiment, you should call
type(C).__getattribute__(C, 'a'). Note that in this case C *has* its
own __getattribute__ attribute (which is meant for instances of C, not
C itself).

C did not have its own __getattribute__ method. It inherited it
from object.


True. Left out a little bit of information there (for brevity).
I still find this whole thing slightly ambiguous.
A class C is itself an object, an instance of 'type',
just as x = C() leads to x being an instance of class C.
But x.__getattribute__ and C.__getattribute__ return
different objects.
Only if you didn't first do x.__getattribute___ = None <wink>. then
x.__getattribute__ doesn't even return anything. x.__getattribute__ is
never meant to be called. It is only called on /type/ objects. If you
want to get an attribute on obj, you call __getattribute__ on type(obj).
(Well that's what Python does, you can just use getattr(obj, 'attr')).
In fact you do this later, and it works. Hmm, at first glance I'd
expect what you do above to return an exception if passed C instead of
an instance of C (like any other well behaved method). I don't know
why that doesn't happen.

I would also have expected an exception. The strange thing, as I see
it, is that x.__getattribute__ and type(C).__getattribute__ both give
the correct result, but that C.__getattribute__ *almost* gives the
correct result, but stops at calling the __get__ function on the
desciptor object.


What C.__getattribute__ doesn't do (maybe it should?) is to check that
the first argument is an instance of C, or at least an instance of
object. I'm just guessing here, but if it continues with the default
mechanism of __getattribute__, it is going to get the staticmethod object.

Anyway, now that you've kindly reminded me of the existance of getattr,
I'll not spend any more time trying to understand this.

Thanks,

Ruud


Jul 18 '05 #7

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
by: Henry 'Pi' James | last post by:
I'm pretty sure this must not be a new idea, but it seems no one else has voiced their agitation about the name "__getattribute__" so far. Its closeness to "__getattr__" is only one thing that...
0
by: Gigi | last post by:
Hi, In the Python documentation regarding __getattribute__ (more attribute access for new style classes) it is mentioned that if __getattribute__ is defined __getattr__ will never be called...
3
by: Sylvain Ferriol | last post by:
hello when i define __getattribute__ in a class, it is for the class instances but if i want to have a __getattribute__ for class attributes how can i do that ? sylvain
5
by: Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens | last post by:
Hi there, I'm facing some strange things - but maybe only me is strange - anyway... i wrote the following code: +++ class T(object): def __init__(self,name='',port=80): self.name=name
1
by: pascal.parent | last post by:
Hi, I try to define a (new-style) class who: - have a __slots__ defined to be strict attributes, - return None if the attribute is 'ok' but not set, or raise a 'normal' error if the attribute...
5
by: Barry Kelly | last post by:
I'm running this version of Python: Python 2.4.3 (#1, May 18 2006, 07:40:45) on cygwin I read in the documentation that these two expressions are interchangeable: ...
4
by: Pedro Werneck | last post by:
Hi all I noticed something strange here while explaining decorators to someone. Not any real use code, but I think it's worth mentioning. When I access a class attribute, on a class with a...
6
by: Adam Donahue | last post by:
As an exercise I'm attempting to write a metaclass that causes an exception to be thrown whenever a user tries to access 'attributes' (in the traditional sense) via a direct reference. Consider:...
8
by: bukzor | last post by:
I want to make a MixIn class that waits to initialize its super- classes until an attribute of the object is accessed. Not generally useful, but desirable in my case. I've written this, and it...
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.