When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent, what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they conflict?
10  1630 
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can do it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent, what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method of editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can do it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent, what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
Try
That is what we have to do too.
Cor
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamschreef in bericht
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent, what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should never
have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your particular
Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microsof t.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
>"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microso ft.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
I have litterally seen otherwise. I am looking at my code right now. I turn
option strict on in one, and it is NOT reflected in the other.
"Scott M." wrote:
No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should never
have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your particular
Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microsof t.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
Have you tried changing Option Stict in the designer withOUT web.config open
in the editor and then opened web.config AFTER you've saved the designer
dialog?
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:25**********************************@microsof t.com...
>I have litterally seen otherwise. I am looking at my code right now. I turn
option strict on in one, and it is NOT reflected in the other.
"Scott M." wrote:
>No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should never
have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your particular
Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into
web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is
what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be
refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microso ft.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather
than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You
shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can
do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it
to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microso ft.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there
are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes
precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
Yes. It does not change web.config.
"Scott M." wrote:
Have you tried changing Option Stict in the designer withOUT web.config open
in the editor and then opened web.config AFTER you've saved the designer
dialog?
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:25**********************************@microsof t.com...
I have litterally seen otherwise. I am looking at my code right now. I turn
option strict on in one, and it is NOT reflected in the other.
"Scott M." wrote:
No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should never
have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your particular
Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into
web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is
what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be
refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microsof t.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences, rather
than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You
shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you can
do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause it
to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008, there
are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes
precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if they
conflict?
Hi MCM,
As for the compile options in "project properties" and web.config
<compilationelement, they are actually different. To clarify the
difference and how each of them will affect ASP.NET Web application
project's output, it may require us to first go through the difference
between "Web Application project" and the default "Web Site project" of
ASP.NET 2.0 Web application.
In ASP.NET 2.0, it by default use dynamic compilation, which means it
doesn't generate precompiled assemblies in bin dir(like ASP.NET 1.1 /VS
2003). And that's just what you'll get when you create ASP.NET 2.0 web
project via the "Web Site project" model. Later, the ASP.NET team add a
new project model "Web Application project", this provide an ASP.NET 1.1/VS
2003 like model, at development time in IDE, you will be able to
build/compile the website and get precompiled assembly in "bin" dir.
However, the precompile only compile those codebehind classes or component
classes(such as those ones in app_code dir) into assemblies, for aspx or
ascx template, it still require dynamic compile at runtime. Here is a blog
entry that also mentioned some information on this:
#ASP.NET 2.0 - Web Site vs Web Application project http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/m...3/ASP.NET-2.0-
_2D00_-Web-Site-vs-Web-Application-project.aspx
Now, let's turn to the difference of the two compilation settings you have
seen:
1. the compilation settings/options in "My project" settings, that one is
used for the precompiling you performed via the build menu in visual
studio, which will affect the generated assembly in bin dir(just like other
non-asp.net projects such as winform, console...)
2. the compilation settings in web.config <compilationelement. This
setting control the compilation options/behaviors of the ASP.NET runtime
dynamic compilation (such as those aspx and ascx template which require
being compiled at runtime when they're accessed first time).
Here are some other articles mentioned some useful information related to
the ASP.NET 2.0 dynamic compilation model and something that coupled with
the visual studio IDE:
#Understanding ASP.NET Dynamic Compilation http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms366723.aspx
#Debug and Release Builds in ASP.NET 2.0 http://odetocode.com/blogs/scott/arc...1/15/2464.aspx
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at: ms****@microsoft.com.
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>From: =?Utf-8?B?TUNN?= <MC*@newsgroup.nospam>
>Subject: Re: web.config vs. My Project
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:32:02 -0700
>Yes. It does not change web.config.
"Scott M." wrote:
>Have you tried changing Option Stict in the designer withOUT web.config
open
>in the editor and then opened web.config AFTER you've saved the designer
dialog?
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:25**********************************@microso ft.com...
>I have litterally seen otherwise. I am looking at my code right now. I
turn
option strict on in one, and it is NOT reflected in the other.
"Scott M." wrote:
No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should
never
>have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your
particular
>Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into
web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is
what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be
refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microso ft.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method
of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it
edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences,
rather
>than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You
shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you
can
>do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are
in
>web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause
it
>to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microso ft.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008,
there
are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear
both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes
precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if
they
conflict?
Very helpful. Thank you for the explanation.
"Steven Cheng [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi MCM,
As for the compile options in "project properties" and web.config
<compilationelement, they are actually different. To clarify the
difference and how each of them will affect ASP.NET Web application
project's output, it may require us to first go through the difference
between "Web Application project" and the default "Web Site project" of
ASP.NET 2.0 Web application.
In ASP.NET 2.0, it by default use dynamic compilation, which means it
doesn't generate precompiled assemblies in bin dir(like ASP.NET 1.1 /VS
2003). And that's just what you'll get when you create ASP.NET 2.0 web
project via the "Web Site project" model. Later, the ASP.NET team add a
new project model "Web Application project", this provide an ASP.NET 1.1/VS
2003 like model, at development time in IDE, you will be able to
build/compile the website and get precompiled assembly in "bin" dir.
However, the precompile only compile those codebehind classes or component
classes(such as those ones in app_code dir) into assemblies, for aspx or
ascx template, it still require dynamic compile at runtime. Here is a blog
entry that also mentioned some information on this:
#ASP.NET 2.0 - Web Site vs Web Application project
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/m...3/ASP.NET-2.0-
_2D00_-Web-Site-vs-Web-Application-project.aspx
Now, let's turn to the difference of the two compilation settings you have
seen:
1. the compilation settings/options in "My project" settings, that one is
used for the precompiling you performed via the build menu in visual
studio, which will affect the generated assembly in bin dir(just like other
non-asp.net projects such as winform, console...)
2. the compilation settings in web.config <compilationelement. This
setting control the compilation options/behaviors of the ASP.NET runtime
dynamic compilation (such as those aspx and ascx template which require
being compiled at runtime when they're accessed first time).
Here are some other articles mentioned some useful information related to
the ASP.NET 2.0 dynamic compilation model and something that coupled with
the visual studio IDE:
#Understanding ASP.NET Dynamic Compilation
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms366723.aspx
#Debug and Release Builds in ASP.NET 2.0
http://odetocode.com/blogs/scott/arc...1/15/2464.aspx
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at:
ms****@microsoft.com.
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
From: =?Utf-8?B?TUNN?= <MC*@newsgroup.nospam>
Subject: Re: web.config vs. My Project
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:32:02 -0700
Yes. It does not change web.config.
"Scott M." wrote:
Have you tried changing Option Stict in the designer withOUT web.config
open
in the editor and then opened web.config AFTER you've saved the designer
dialog?
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:25**********************************@microsof t.com...
I have litterally seen otherwise. I am looking at my code right now. I
turn
option strict on in one, and it is NOT reflected in the other.
"Scott M." wrote:
No, I'm sorry, but you are incorrect.
Perhaps you misunderstood what I said. I didn't say that we should
never
have to edit web.config directly. My comments were about your
particular
Option Strict, etc. settings. You should never have to go into
web.config
to turn Option Strict (and various other settings) on or off, that is
what
My Project dialogs are for and if you change it in one, it will be
refelcted
in the other.
-Scott
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:AD**********************************@microsof t.com...
That is incorrect. I agree that My Project is meant to be a method
of
editing
config files, but not web.config. Check for yourself. Perhaps it
edits
app.config? That would make sense.
"Scott M." wrote:
"My Project" is meant to be the way to set your preferences,
rather
than
going into configuration files and editing them manually. You
shouldn't
ever have to go into web.config to set option strict because you
can
do
it
in the My Project dialgogs.
I don't think you can have a conflict because for things that are
in
web.config and My Project, changing the setting in one will cause
it
to
change in the other.
"MCM" <MC*@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:A9**********************************@microsof t.com...
When creating a new VB Web Application Project with VS2008,
there
are
several
settings (compiler settings, option strict, etc) that appear
both in
the
web.config file and "My Project". I'm wondering what takes
precedent,
what
the benefit of using one vs. the other is, and what happens if
they
conflict?
You're welcome.
If there is anything else we can help, welcome to post here.
Sincerely,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at: ms****@microsoft.com.
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>From: =?Utf-8?B?TUNN?= <MC*@newsgroup.nospam>
@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
>Subject: Re: web.config vs. My Project
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:08:10 -0700
>
Very helpful. Thank you for the explanation.
"Steven Cheng [MSFT]" wrote:
>Hi MCM,
As for the compile options in "project properties" and web.config
<compilationelement, they are actually different. To clarify the
difference and how each of them will affect ASP.NET Web application
project's output, it may require us to first go through the difference
between "Web Application project" and the default "Web Site project" of
ASP.NET 2.0 Web application.
In ASP.NET 2.0, it by default use dynamic compilation, which means it
doesn't generate precompiled assemblies in bin dir(like ASP.NET 1.1 /VS
2003). And that's just what you'll get when you create ASP.NET 2.0 web
project via the "Web Site project" model. Later, the ASP.NET team add a
new project model "Web Application project", this provide an ASP.NET
1.1/VS
>2003 like model, at development time in IDE, you will be able to
build/compile the website and get precompiled assembly in "bin" dir.
However, the precompile only compile those codebehind classes or
component
>classes(such as those ones in app_code dir) into assemblies, for aspx or
ascx template, it still require dynamic compile at runtime. Here is a
blog
>entry that also mentioned some information on this:
#ASP.NET 2.0 - Web Site vs Web Application project
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/m...3/ASP.NET-2.0-
>_2D00_-Web-Site-vs-Web-Application-project.aspx
Now, let's turn to the difference of the two compilation settings you
have
>seen:
1. the compilation settings/options in "My project" settings, that one
is
>used for the precompiling you performed via the build menu in visual
studio, which will affect the generated assembly in bin dir(just like
other
>non-asp.net projects such as winform, console...)
2. the compilation settings in web.config <compilationelement. This
setting control the compilation options/behaviors of the ASP.NET runtime
dynamic compilation (such as those aspx and ascx template which require
being compiled at runtime when they're accessed first time).
Here are some other articles mentioned some useful information related
to
>the ASP.NET 2.0 dynamic compilation model and something that coupled
with
>the visual studio IDE:
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Craig |
last post by:
I've developed an single sign on web application that we'd like to use with
all the applications we're developing. The application's connection string
is stored in web.config. I've gotten some...
|
by: Ruslan |
last post by:
Hello,
I have to project: one ASN.NET project and another - Web Service in the same
solution. I want to use the same web.config and global.asax files. Does it
possible?
|
by: Christopher Kimbell |
last post by:
I have a class library that contains a number of TableAdapters and I'm using
this from a web application. Is there a way of getting the TableAdapters to
use the connectionstrings defined in...
|
by: feng |
last post by:
Hi,
We just converted our VB.Net Windows exe project from
VS.Net 2002 to VS.Net 2003 and ran into a problem. the
MyApp.exe.config file that we use for our customized
configuration settings is...
|
by: Keith Elder |
last post by:
Let's say you have a stand alone C# library project that is your
datalayer. When this library compiles it will produce
"My.DataLayer.dll" for example.
In the project you use all the new...
|
by: Sridhar |
last post by:
Hi,
I have created a project which contains classes to read the data from the
database. This project has an App.Config file which contains the
SqlConnection String. when this code is called from...
|
by: TS |
last post by:
I cannot get this to work. I added an app.config to a project i reference
from my web application project (vs 05) but can see no way to access the
settings within it.
the other thing is that I...
|
by: dbuchanan |
last post by:
Hello,
(Is this the proper newsgroup?)
=== Background ===
I am building a solution with two projects.
One project is my data access layer which contains my DataSet as an xsd
file. The XSD...
|
by: Jeff |
last post by:
I have a solution with two projects. Project A is the startup
project, while Project B serves as the project with the data logic.
At run time, the first thing I need to do is write to Project...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
| |
