Key constraint for attribute of different elements (XML schema)

[tthunder]

Hi @all,

I am trying to set a key constraint in my XML Schema, which concers all
elements containing an attribute named "ID"

My XML example:

<root>
<x ID='1'>
<y ID='2'>
</y>
<y ID='3'>
</y>
<z>
</z>
</x>
<x ID='4'>
</x>
</root>

The problem is to set selector and field...
Of course this works for this example:

<xs:key name="UniqueID">
<xs:selector xpath="x|x/y"/>
<xs:field xpath="@ID"/>
</xs:key>

The problem is, that I have many many different tags. So I want to do
something like this:

<xs:key name="UniqueID">
<xs:selector xpath="*[@ID]"/>
<xs:field xpath="@ID"/>
</xs:key>

But this is not XML schema compatible :(

Ref:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlsch...ity-constraint

Any workarounds, ideas, tipps?

Thanks,
Kirsten

[Priscilla Walmsley]

Hi,

What about using a unique constraint instead? That way, if the ID
attribute appears, it must be unique. If it doesn't appear, that's not
a problem. So you could use:

<xs:unique name="UniqueID">
<xs:selector xpath=".//*"/>
<xs:field xpath="@ID"/>
</xs:unique>

Hope that helps,
Priscilla

----------------------------------
Priscilla Walmsley
Author, Definitive XML Schema
Definitive XQuery
http://www.datypic.com
----------------------------------

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

[tthunder]

The problem is, that there is a problem if ID does not appear.
Therefore I tried using the predicate [@ID].

BTW: I'm using Altova XML Spy 2006 for validating...

[Priscilla Walmsley]

If you use "unique" instead of "key", there should not be a problem if
the ID attribute does not appear - that is why I suggested changing it.

If XML Spy says it's a problem, there is a bug.

Hope that helps,
Priscilla

----------------------------------
Priscilla Walmsley
Author, Definitive XML Schema
Definitive XQuery
http://www.datypic.com
----------------------------------

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

[tthunder]

I thought, that I must use key when using keyref, too?

[Priscilla Walmsley]

Hi,

No, you can have a keyref that refers to a "unique" constraint also.

Hope that helps,
Priscilla

----------------------------------
Priscilla Walmsley
Author, Definitive XML Schema
Definitive XQuery
http://www.datypic.com
----------------------------------

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***