473,465 Members | 1,903 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Create Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

beta2 XHTML compliance? is this necessary. OR STUPID...read UP MICROSOFT

I heard that beta 2 now makes ASP.NET xhtml compliant.

Can anyone shed some light on what this will change and it will break stuff
as converting HTML to XHTML pages DO break things. see,
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/betterliving/

I read on
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframewo...etfxcompat.asp

It said they changed stuff like this

" Standards Compliance: The HTML rendering in ASP.NET was updated to be
XHTML 1.0 Transitional, which is standards compliant "

which is again another STUPID standard compliance mindnumb robot type of
thinking. Standard compliance is and will NEVER be important as getting it
to work on multiple browsers, period. What good is standards if the app
doesn't even work? How about a new standard? It's called getting it to work
instead of listening to some stupid committee who sits around all day in
conference talking to each other but know nothing of the real world in
getting things to actually work.

Nov 22 '05
101 2638
Gary,

You replied to my post and not our difficult developer friend, Rhat.

"Gary Bond" wrote:
rhat

You ought to be ashamed of yourself. All of these guys here are trying to
help, and all you can do is be rude like a spoilt brat. Look at the last
line of Teemu Keiski's post, it said

"Maybe we can help? "

Grow up and leave these newsgroups for people who appreciate the help here,
and can be polite and not throw a tantrum like a 3 year old.
"Logan Greenlee" wrote:
Your line of thinking is exactly why you have to code for multiple browsers
in the first place. If everyone agrees, and complies with the same standards
one will get the same result. If everyone makes an effort to be standards
compliant - then everything will perform the same way.

Also you'll find that standards compliance its not required. You can
certainly continue to write your non compliant browser breaking code. VS.NET
helpfully points out your errors and you have an opportunity to correct them.

"rhat" wrote:
I heard that beta 2 now makes ASP.NET xhtml compliant.

Can anyone shed some light on what this will change and it will break stuff
as converting HTML to XHTML pages DO break things. see,
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/betterliving/

I read on
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframewo...etfxcompat.asp

It said they changed stuff like this

" Standards Compliance: The HTML rendering in ASP.NET was updated to be
XHTML 1.0 Transitional, which is standards compliant "

which is again another STUPID standard compliance mindnumb robot type of
thinking. Standard compliance is and will NEVER be important as getting it
to work on multiple browsers, period. What good is standards if the app
doesn't even work? How about a new standard? It's called getting it to work
instead of listening to some stupid committee who sits around all day in
conference talking to each other but know nothing of the real world in
getting things to actually work.


Nov 22 '05 #101
Gary,

You replied to my post and not our difficult developer friend, Rhat.

"Gary Bond" wrote:
rhat

You ought to be ashamed of yourself. All of these guys here are trying to
help, and all you can do is be rude like a spoilt brat. Look at the last
line of Teemu Keiski's post, it said

"Maybe we can help? "

Grow up and leave these newsgroups for people who appreciate the help here,
and can be polite and not throw a tantrum like a 3 year old.
"Logan Greenlee" wrote:
Your line of thinking is exactly why you have to code for multiple browsers
in the first place. If everyone agrees, and complies with the same standards
one will get the same result. If everyone makes an effort to be standards
compliant - then everything will perform the same way.

Also you'll find that standards compliance its not required. You can
certainly continue to write your non compliant browser breaking code. VS.NET
helpfully points out your errors and you have an opportunity to correct them.

"rhat" wrote:
I heard that beta 2 now makes ASP.NET xhtml compliant.

Can anyone shed some light on what this will change and it will break stuff
as converting HTML to XHTML pages DO break things. see,
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/betterliving/

I read on
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframewo...etfxcompat.asp

It said they changed stuff like this

" Standards Compliance: The HTML rendering in ASP.NET was updated to be
XHTML 1.0 Transitional, which is standards compliant "

which is again another STUPID standard compliance mindnumb robot type of
thinking. Standard compliance is and will NEVER be important as getting it
to work on multiple browsers, period. What good is standards if the app
doesn't even work? How about a new standard? It's called getting it to work
instead of listening to some stupid committee who sits around all day in
conference talking to each other but know nothing of the real world in
getting things to actually work.


Nov 22 '05 #102

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

119
by: rhat | last post by:
I heard that beta 2 now makes ASP.NET xhtml compliant. Can anyone shed some light on what this will change and it will break stuff as converting HTML to XHTML pages DO break things. see,...
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
1
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
0
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.