The war of the OSes was won a long time ago.
Unix has always been, and will continue to be, the Server OS in the form
of Linux.
Microsoft struggled mightily to win that battle -- creating a poor man's
DBMS, a broken email server and various other /application/ servers to
try and crack the Internet and IS markets.
In the case where they didn't spend their own money to get companies to
install servers, they failed miserably, and the 1 Billion per quarter
Linux market is testament to that.
But, what M$ didn't want you to know, is that the only reason they
wanted to dominate the server, is to protect their desktop and office
applications market.
Seal up the server, and the desktop is safe; cede the server, and the
desktop will fall.
And so it is...falling into the hands of Linux.
Nov 22 '05
409 10962
Scott M. wrote: But those Linux boxes are still a small percentage of the entire market. That's what I said. Hackers hack where they can do the most damage. They will do more damage by taking down (or trying to take down) 95% of the machines out there.
What better way to hack into a webserver and use that as a platform to
distribute your virus by changing the websites there to exploit a
loophole in IE. You're overlooking the fact that one webserver come into
contact with thousands of desktops. And don't underestimate the number
of servers in the world.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v.
"C# Learner" <cs****@learner .here> wrote in message
news:1j******** *******@csharp. learner... Thomas J Shea <Thomas J Sh**@discussion s.microsoft.com> wrote:
I've used both windows and Linux/BSD extensively and my security training has included both systems in equal detail. The only diffrence I see between them is the relative patience it takes to operate/maintain both and NOT crash them.
I disagree.
Here's a simple example of how I believe Windows is less secure than *nix: you can download an executable in Windows and then run it simply by double-clicking its icon. In *nix, you're required to take the extra step of making that file executable, during which time you'll think twice about whether or not you actually want to execute it.
Another example: Windows user accounts are created with full administrator privileges by default (I don't know if this is still the case with SP2, though I assume so).
Well, it is a PERSONAL computer now, isn't it. How many people share your
linux desktop? It's easy to throw stones if you don't live in a glass
house, but one of the main reasons that PCs are so popular is the ease of
use of Windows. If everyone had to know how to administer linux or else
hire someone to do it for them, 99% of the PC sales would never happen.
> What better way to hack into a webserver and use that as a platform to distribute your virus by changing the websites there to exploit a loophole in IE.
The better way would be to go after those platforms directly.
You're overlooking the fact that one webserver come into contact with thousands of desktops. And don't underestimate the number of servers in the world.
No, I'm not. I'm simply saying that there are FAR more Windows machines
than any other platform in use and that is why they are targetted more than
others. I never said others weren't targetted.
-- Rinze van Huizen C-Services Holland b.v.
"Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nosp am> wrote: I said a Linux *webserver*, not desktop. Whether or not the OS that, that webserver happens to use is widely-used is irrelevant here. I know what you said and the OS is relevant. Again, I'll say that if a hacker has a chance to take down a few web sites or 95% of the worlds pc's, they generally choose 95% of the worlds pc's.
So apparently you've misunderstood the context (see below). Anyway, the subject was cracking a single box, not a huge mass of boxen. Please specify that you're changing the argument in future.
??? They issue has not been about a single box...
Yes, it has. Here is the context:
"Maybe, but, like I said, the rewards of cracking a Linux webserver will
probably be much more enticing than those of cracking Joe Average's
desktop, in general." It is not my opinion that Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds desktop computers.
...and I didn't state that it was -- nice strawman. ;-)
Uh, yes you did.
Where?
("In fact, it seems to me that *you* instead have attempted to pose your opinions as facts, in this thread.").
I asked, "Can you prove that there are armies
attempting to take down Windows boxen, for example? Or that it's a
'*misconception * that MS software is 'less-secure' than other software.'"
> ??? They issue has not been about a single box... Yes, it has. Here is the context:
"Maybe, but, like I said, the rewards of cracking a Linux webserver will probably be much more enticing than those of cracking Joe Average's desktop, in general."
Actually, this is YOU quoting YOU when YOU were changing the subject away
from what was already being discussed....Si ngle Boxes. It is not my opinion that Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds desktop computers.
...and I didn't state that it was -- nice strawman. ;-)
Uh, yes you did.
Where?
Right here, when you said: ("In fact, it seems to me that *you* instead have attempted to pose your opinions as facts, in this thread.").
Sounds very much like you stating that what I've said was my opinion...
I asked, "Can you prove that there are armies attempting to take down Windows boxen, for example? Or that it's a '*misconception * that MS software is 'less-secure' than other software.'"
....And, I responded. Go back and READ what was written instead of just
looking for a way to post a snide response. You've contradicted yourself
and ignored what I've said here.
I really don't have any more time for you. Have a nice day.
"Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nosp am> wrote: ??? They issue has not been about a single box...
Yes, it has. Here is the context:
"Maybe, but, like I said, the rewards of cracking a Linux webserver will probably be much more enticing than those of cracking Joe Average's desktop, in general."
Actually, this is YOU quoting YOU when YOU were changing the subject away from what was already being discussed....Si ngle Boxes.
I was quoting myself there because it was I who created that context. > It is not my opinion that Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds > desktop > computers.
...and I didn't state that it was -- nice strawman. ;-)
Uh, yes you did.
Where?
Right here, when you said:
("In fact, it seems to me that *you* instead have attempted to pose your opinions as facts, in this thread."). Sounds very much like you stating that what I've said was my opinion...
I meant that in general, of course. I certainly didn't mean that every
single thing that you've said in this thread is your opinion only.
I didn't state that it was your opinion that "Windows is on approx. 95% of
the worlds desktop computers." I didn't address that point at all.
I asked, "Can you prove that there are armies attempting to take down Windows boxen, for example? Or that it's a '*misconception * that MS software is 'less-secure' than other software.'"
...And, I responded.
....with no proof, just general statements about being able to find some
data somewhere on some website. Provide direct links if you're confident.
I would've given you the benefit of the doubt of having the last reply
here, but your "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude irks me enough to
reply again.
billwg wrote: IfÂ*everyoneÂ*h adÂ*toÂ*knowÂ*h owÂ*toÂ*adminis terÂ*linuxÂ*or *else hire someone to do it for them, 99% of the PC sales would never happen.
Nonesense.
Bill
I'm sorry, what is the point again?
Maybe you should go to http://www.cert.org and search for Linux to see the
record of this OS shipping with vulnerabilities . You might be surprised.
"C# Learner" wrote: "Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nosp am> wrote:
??? They issue has not been about a single box...
Yes, it has. Here is the context:
"Maybe, but, like I said, the rewards of cracking a Linux webserver will probably be much more enticing than those of cracking Joe Average's desktop, in general."
Actually, this is YOU quoting YOU when YOU were changing the subject away from what was already being discussed....Si ngle Boxes.
I was quoting myself there because it was I who created that context.
>> It is not my opinion that Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds >> desktop >> computers. > > ...and I didn't state that it was -- nice strawman. ;-)
Uh, yes you did.
Where?
Right here, when you said:
("In fact, it seems to me that *you* instead have attempted to pose your opinions as facts, in this thread.").
Sounds very much like you stating that what I've said was my opinion...
I meant that in general, of course. I certainly didn't mean that every single thing that you've said in this thread is your opinion only.
I didn't state that it was your opinion that "Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds desktop computers." I didn't address that point at all.
I asked, "Can you prove that there are armies attempting to take down Windows boxen, for example? Or that it's a '*misconception * that MS software is 'less-secure' than other software.'"
...And, I responded.
....with no proof, just general statements about being able to find some data somewhere on some website. Provide direct links if you're confident.
I would've given you the benefit of the doubt of having the last reply here, but your "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude irks me enough to reply again.
Regarding searching cert.org for vulnerability reports.
525 vulnerabiltiy results for Windows XP
923 vulnerabiltiy results for Linux
"C# Learner" wrote: "Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nosp am> wrote:
??? They issue has not been about a single box...
Yes, it has. Here is the context:
"Maybe, but, like I said, the rewards of cracking a Linux webserver will probably be much more enticing than those of cracking Joe Average's desktop, in general."
Actually, this is YOU quoting YOU when YOU were changing the subject away from what was already being discussed....Si ngle Boxes.
I was quoting myself there because it was I who created that context.
>> It is not my opinion that Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds >> desktop >> computers. > > ...and I didn't state that it was -- nice strawman. ;-)
Uh, yes you did.
Where?
Right here, when you said:
("In fact, it seems to me that *you* instead have attempted to pose your opinions as facts, in this thread.").
Sounds very much like you stating that what I've said was my opinion...
I meant that in general, of course. I certainly didn't mean that every single thing that you've said in this thread is your opinion only.
I didn't state that it was your opinion that "Windows is on approx. 95% of the worlds desktop computers." I didn't address that point at all.
I asked, "Can you prove that there are armies attempting to take down Windows boxen, for example? Or that it's a '*misconception * that MS software is 'less-secure' than other software.'"
...And, I responded.
....with no proof, just general statements about being able to find some data somewhere on some website. Provide direct links if you're confident.
I would've given you the benefit of the doubt of having the last reply here, but your "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude irks me enough to reply again.
Fact from fiction
Unix and Linux is rubbish operating system that falls over on any server and
any person who say that you can not get a virus or worm on unix or linux are
full of themselfs,
Unix is was never a desktop operating system and neither was linux until
around 1998,
This crap that unix or linux is this wonderful operating system that is
stable has never put it through its paces and the truth of the matter is this
any software can be comprised by a simple binary test and all operating
system can crash by a simple power failure or hardware fault.
there is nothing great about Linux or Unix to me it is just another piece of
software for some person to sell and make money off wether it is by actually
selling the operating system or by running it in a company,
And all these virus, trojans, and worm writers are really programmers who
have nothing better to do than cause head aches for every person who is
trying to get there job's dun and stay in a job.
Microsoft may not have a good track record but at least there operating
system is straight forward no bull crap and gets your job dun in the least
amount of time with having to go through countless of webpages just to find
and update something linux and unix are hopeless at.
and the claims that billions of companies are using linuxs are exaggerated
because the truth is they are use upto three different operatings systems
just to prevent attacks to there servers which are ussually run by a linux
server that can not stop a hacker in the first place.
most companies will not install linuxs becuase of the long hours of
installing and the complex training involved which cost money and profits and
time learning the language while the alterative is windows which is easy to
install managable easy to fix and widely available information on how to use
it and updates,
Windows can be backup and running without lost of data if managed correctly
after virus and worm attacks also most windows only involves one cd disk
instead of the linux two to three disk installation.
Microsoft may not be the favour of people because of the cost but when you
put linux on the same platform cost wise or free windows is far greater
accepted in the community because of its ease of use and relability to get
the job dun,
Unix and linux are over rated software and only mandrake came close to
windows for desktop environment competiveness
"John Bailo" wrote: The war of the OSes was won a long time ago.
Unix has always been, and will continue to be, the Server OS in the form of Linux.
Microsoft struggled mightily to win that battle -- creating a poor man's DBMS, a broken email server and various other /application/ servers to try and crack the Internet and IS markets.
In the case where they didn't spend their own money to get companies to install servers, they failed miserably, and the 1 Billion per quarter Linux market is testament to that.
But, what M$ didn't want you to know, is that the only reason they wanted to dominate the server, is to protect their desktop and office applications market.
Seal up the server, and the desktop is safe; cede the server, and the desktop will fall.
And so it is...falling into the hands of Linux This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: John Bailo |
last post by:
The war of the OSes was won a long time ago.
Unix has always been, and will continue to be, the Server OS in the form
of Linux.
Microsoft struggled mightily to win that battle -- creating a poor man's
DBMS, a broken email server and various other /application/ servers to
try and crack the Internet and IS markets.
In the case where they...
|
by: Boris Bulit |
last post by:
Does anyone know how to create a Windows Forms Application Desktop
Toolbar in VB.NET?
Something like this:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=BC0A1F5C-07FF-4B50-B3FF-FF60795FD21E
But in VB.NET
Thanks
Boris
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |