No argument? What is there to argue?
"It's better" By what measure? I can easily refute this by forming my
argument such that only my operating system can meet the requirements. For
example, a better operating system would be made by Microsoft, therefore
Linux CAN'T be better, since it's not made by Microsoft.
Faster? Once again, by what measure? Windows on a P4 3200 is MUCH faster
than Linux on a 286.
More stable? Wow, three in a row. Windows is MUCH more stable than linux
kernel .01. Shoot, I'll bet that version of linux wouldn't even run (oh
hey, what do you know, according to Linus, IT WOULDN'T
run--http://www.li.org/linuxhistory.php)!
More widely used? More widely used for what? Last time I checked, windows
is still used on 98% of the desktops of the world . . .
If you want real discussion and dialog, don't post flamebait.
I swore I'd never respond to stupid posts like this, but I couldn't resist.
:)
"TCS" <Th*********************@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote in message
news:sl************************************@c-24-8-35-132.client.comcast.net...
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 21:11:07 -0500, Scott M. <s-***@BADSPAMsnet.net> wrote: It's better, superior, faster, more stable and more widely used than
windos.
Are you twelve or thirteen years old?
yet you have no argument. How does it feel to be inferior to a
12 year old?