OSS Benchmark -- Windos Users Fail to Step Up to the Plate

[SARS]

Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos challengers...

http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/OSS%20Benchmark.pdf
The source is here:

http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/limit-cpu.c

[SARS]

Person SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> says...

Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos challengers...

http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/OSS%20Benchmark.pdf
The source is here:

http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/limit-cpu.c

Hey, I just fixed up the PDF, the last column was a little off.

[Mark]

SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> wrote in
news:b5******************************@news.teranew s.com:

Person SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> says...

Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos
challengers...

setrlimit and getrlimit don't do anything in windows.

Mark

[SARS]

Person Mark <[e-mail]> says...

SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> wrote in
news:b5******************************@news.teranew s.com:

Person SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> says...

Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos
challengers...

setrlimit and getrlimit don't do anything in windows.

Mark

Windos suks ass

Why do I bother.

OK -- this OSS standard is for LINUX ONLY

It's time to stop accomdating the Wintards.

[General Protection Fault]

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:05:05 GMT, SARS wrote:

Person Mark <[e-mail]> says...

SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> wrote in
news:b5******************************@news.teranew s.com:

Person SARS <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> says...
Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos
challengers...

setrlimit and getrlimit don't do anything in windows.

Mark

Windos suks ass

Why do I bother.

OK -- this OSS standard is for LINUX ONLY

It's time to stop accomdating the Wintards.

You're the one so retarded as to create a cross-platform benchmark that isn't
cross-platform, then to complain that the other side didn't do their part.

--
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE i386
1:30PM up 46 days, 15:41, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

[Eric Gunnerson [MS]]

Umm. What are you trying to benchmark? If it's just the printf(), then my
guess is that it's going to depend on the efficiency of the I/O system, and
perhaps more on the speed and size of the console window. I know that if you
ran this in Windows, it would run much faster on a one-line console window
than a 40-line one, and even faster when piped to a file.

--
Eric Gunnerson

Visit the C# product team at http://www.csharp.net
Eric's blog is at http://weblogs.asp.net/ericgu/

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"SARS" <SA**@atlanda.ccd.gov.org> wrote in message
news:48******************************@news.teranew s.com...

Here's all the OSS Benchmarks run so far -- so far no Windos challengers...
http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/OSS%20Benchmark.pdf
The source is here:

http://home.earthlink.net/~jabailo/limit-cpu.c