I donīt think that C# will replace C++. As long as you need to deliver the
Redist with, I donīt know exactly how much but too much MBīs, for a simple
application with just about 10kB this thing canīt be used for all customers.
Another thing is this Garbage Collector, where MS says that they handle the
memory. But I can say that the memory isnīt handle correctly and when you
have a big Application (C#) with forms you can reboot your computer at least
every 2 days because the Memory Usage increases.
Mono is just half of the game unless they implement forms -> if you have to
work on other plattforms too, you have to use c++.
ElBarto
"Andre Kaufmann" <an************ ****@t-online.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:eN******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...
Dave wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:25:01 -0800, "Greg" <gm@mcpherran.c om> wrote:
There are some cases where C++ is the only option: e.g. a pure native
Windows App with no .NET Runtime required.
I don't think this is the case any more. It appears that MS has not
provided any way to install the required DLLs for a native app without
>[...]
If you statically link the CRT you won't have any problems to run your
native executables on WinXP / Win2K.
If you want to deploy executables dynamically linked to the C runtime,
there's perhaps an interesting article for you:
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/vcredists_x86.asp
Hope that helps.
Andre