Murray R. Van Luyn. wrote:
"-Lost" <mi*********@comcast.netwrote in message
news:PN******************************@comcast.com. ..
>>It means "less than or equal to." Wherever you "borrowed" this Internet
Explorer hack code should have explained that. If not:
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html
...does.
I guess if I just change <!--[if lte IE 6]to <!--[if lte IE 7]then
maybe I'll get a working menu for IE7.
There's also always <!--[if IE]>, as noted on the page whose URL -Lost
provided you with (but which you may not have read). You could also read
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/a...omment_ovw.asp
I can't imagine that very much would
have changed in the way CSS is interpretted between the 'lte' IE6 and IE7
versions. We'll give that a shot and see what the result is.
Woouldn't you rather _research_ and find out what the differences are,
instead of just whacking in some hack and hoping everything all works
out somehow?
Microsoft lists the CSS differences at
http://preview.tinyurl.com/b245h.
And no, your IE-specific code looks quite frightful, although menu
things "happen" in IE6. The W3C validator doesn't check your
conditionally commented code, but what I've seen by quick inspection
looks nasty. Making whole tables into a-links is not something I'd
recommend, nor is using malformed code:
<A href="#">Remote Control<B>></B><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD>
Listamatic doesn't have a multiple-layer menu you can use for IE?
