Hi,
we have a procedure with following structure ...
Insert into some regular tables using a unique 'call_id'
returning a cursor to caller with the rows relevant to this CALL .
CREATE PROCEDURE
begin
....
SET v_call_id = generate_unique();
....
begin
Declare return_cursor cursor with return to client for
select ......
.......
where t1.call_id = v_call_id
from table1,table2,table3
OPEN return_cursor;
end;
delete from table1 where call_id = v_call_id;
delete from table2 where call_id = v_call_id;
delete from table3 where call_id = v_call_id;
end;
The curious thing is this ...
If we don't perform the deletes at the end all works fine, if the
deletes are performed 1 row is lost from the result set ??
Is this a valid construct to OPEN Cursor with return then delete
immediately after before exiting the SP? - It builds and runs fine
apart from this. 8 3412
PaulR wrote: Hi,
we have a procedure with following structure ...
Insert into some regular tables using a unique 'call_id' returning a cursor to caller with the rows relevant to this CALL .
CREATE PROCEDURE begin ... SET v_call_id = generate_unique(); ... begin Declare return_cursor cursor with return to client for select ...... ....... where t1.call_id = v_call_id from table1,table2,table3
OPEN return_cursor; end; delete from table1 where call_id = v_call_id; delete from table2 where call_id = v_call_id; delete from table3 where call_id = v_call_id; end;
The curious thing is this ...
If we don't perform the deletes at the end all works fine, if the deletes are performed 1 row is lost from the result set ??
Is this a valid construct to OPEN Cursor with return then delete immediately after before exiting the SP? - It builds and runs fine apart from this.
The result set of the cursor gets computed as you retrieve the data.
So when you do the delete you are affecting the query "in flight".
This is called "self hosing"
I'm taking a guess here at what you may be trying to do:
Declare return_cursor cursor with return to client for
WITH d1 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t1 WHERE ..)),
d2 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t2 WHERE ..)),
d3 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t3 WHERE ..))
select * from t1, t2, t3
Cheers
Serge
PS: Prereq: DB2 V8.1.4 for LUW
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Serge Rielau wrote: Declare return_cursor cursor with return to client for WITH d1 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t1 WHERE ..)), d2 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t2 WHERE ..)), d3 AS (SELECT * FROM OLD TABLE(DELETE FROM t3 WHERE ..))
select from d1, d2, d3
Sorry
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Serge,
Many thanks for your explanation, I was wrongly assuming the result set
was 'protected' once the cursor was opened.
This explains exactly what I am seeing.
Unfortunately, I don't understand the construct you are using with the
CTEs ?
- Do you have a pointer I can go off and read?
What the procedure is doing is using 3 Regular Tables as "temp tables"
rather than using SESSION tables.
and deleting from these temp tables at the end of the Procedure i.e
self cleaning.
- we could look at a scheduled garbaage collection instead as a
simple solution.
PS. The Procedure currently uses SESSION tables, but this incurs a
(signiifcant)compile overhead on the first
call after connection, and seems to require multiple plans in
the Package cache 1 per connection.
This is a very big/complex Procedure that is required to execute
sub-second, so we are always looking
for ways to optimise it.
Thanks.
PaulR wrote: Serge,
Many thanks for your explanation, I was wrongly assuming the result set was 'protected' once the cursor was opened.
This explains exactly what I am seeing.
Unfortunately, I don't understand the construct you are using with the CTEs ? - Do you have a pointer I can go off and read?
Have a look here: http://tinyurl.com/cal57
--
Knut Stolze
DB2 Information Integration Development
IBM Germany
I tried to repoduce Paul Reddin's problem, but am unable to (See below)
I fail to understand why the behaviour is different.
Any clues ?
Sathyaram
create table sptest(i int,j int)
0 record(s) affected
insert into sptest values(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)
4 record(s) affected
CREATE PROCEDURE PROC_SPTEST (in p_i int)
result sets 1
language sql
begin
begin
declare c1 cursor with return for select i,j from sptest ;
open c1 ;
end ;
delete from sptest where i=p_i ;
end
0 record(s) affected
select * from sptest
I J
---- ----
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
4 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 0/ms] [Fetch Data: 0/ms]
call proc_sptest(1)
I J
---- ----
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
4 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 0/ms] [Fetch Data: 0/ms]
select * from sptest
I J
---- ----
2 2
3 3
4 4
3 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 0/ms] [Fetch Data: 10/ms]
Serge,
This works a treat !! many thanks, I now understand your paper too :-)
Hi,
It doesn't surprise me you weren't able to re-create this ...
as in our scenario we only see the problem 'sometimes' e.g seems to
depend on how many rows are returned by the SP.
and interestingly we only ever seem to lose 1 row (but maybe that is
coincidence too).
Thanks. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Andrew Edwards |
last post by:
The following function results in an infinite loop! After 5+ hours of
debugging, I am still unable to decipher what I am incorrectly. Any
assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,...
|
by: deanbrown3d |
last post by:
I mean, is this correct?
try
{
Screen->Cursor = crHourglass;
Do something bad
return false;
else
return true;
}
|
by: johnb41 |
last post by:
I have a datagrid that successfully allows editing and updating (with
dataadapter.update command). I want the user to be able to edit the
"text" in the datagrid, but i DON'T want the user to be...
|
by: heming_g |
last post by:
i see in this forum to make this routine using
"DELETE FROM (SELECT 1 FROM <name> WHERE <condition> FETCH FIRST <n>
ROWS
ONLY)
Prepare this one ONCE then EXECUTE in the loop. "
it works .
...
|
by: surya |
last post by:
hi all
i hava eetable that is ,
eename sal
_______ ________
suresh 100000
ramsesh 100000
raja 100000
susjssj 100000
dkddkd ...
| |
by: ilo |
last post by:
When I want to delete a data from a table that this tabl has a trigger
and this trigger reached another tables to delete the data in cursor I
have this messeage:
DELETE failed because the...
|
by: mathon |
last post by:
hello,
i thought i create a new topic for that because i deal with a certain
problem. I have implemented all methods for a LinkdeList (for my
sequence class) and tested all correct. Now i only...
|
by: ujjwaltrivedi |
last post by:
Can I use any method to allocate /deallocate memory other than new/
delete operators? Actually the problem is while using delete operator
in my ".sqc" files the application crashes. It seems the...
|
by: Michel Esber |
last post by:
Hello,
Env: DB2 V8 LUW FP16 running Linux
create Table X (machine_id varchar(24) not null, ctime timestamp not
null);
create index iFoo on X (MACHINE_ID, CTIME) allow reverse scans;
alter...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
| |