Introduce a C Compiler ucc

[dreamAnders]

ucc is an ANSI C Compiler. Its code size is about 15,000 lines.
The lexer, parser and code generator are all hand-written.
The code structure is very clear and straightforward. And there is an
interesting value numbering algorithm.
It also has a document explaining the internal implementation.
If you are interested at this compiler, you can download it from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ucc, which will help you to master the
C language.

[Richard Heathfield]

CBFalconer said:

"no*************@gmail.com" wrote:

>"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]:

>>dreamAnders <[e-mail]:

ucc is an ANSI C Compiler. Its code size is about 15,000 lines.

... snip ...

>>>
Congratulations. I hope this project will evolve quickly.

Also, I don't really like the fact that one must have Ms Studio
to compile the compiler :) Can't you distribute binaries?

You mean it isn't even written in C?

I don't see how you deduce that. It is precisely because it /is/ written in
C that you need a C compiler if you wish to compile it.

If so, that is the end of that project.

I don't see why. If I wanted to write a compiler for some arbitrary
language X, I'd almost certainly choose C to do it, rather than X. So why
someone else can't choose to write a C compiler in language X rather than
C is beyond me. And in any case, this C compiler /is/ written in C...

....except for one tiny annoying bit that uses an anonymous struct which, on
my system, halts compilation (using UCC's own makefile, so we can't blame
my martinet switches this time).

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

[CBFalconer]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

CBFalconer said:

>"no*************@gmail.com" wrote:

>>"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]:
dreamAnders <[e-mail]:

ucc is an ANSI C Compiler. Its code size is about 15,000 lines.
>

... snip ...

>>>>
Congratulations. I hope this project will evolve quickly.

Also, I don't really like the fact that one must have Ms Studio
to compile the compiler :) Can't you distribute binaries?

You mean it isn't even written in C?

I don't see how you deduce that. It is precisely because it /is/
written in C that you need a C compiler if you wish to compile it.

I asked a question, as indicated by the terminal '?'. If one
_needs_ some peculiar MS stuff to compile it, can it possibly be
written in C, as understood in this newsgroup?

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Richard Heathfield]

CBFalconer said:

<snip>

If one
_needs_ some peculiar MS stuff to compile it,

It doesn't. gcc compiles most of it just fine. My version barfs on
anonymous structs, but I guess I could go fix those if I cared enough.

can it possibly be
written in C, as understood in this newsgroup?

Modulo the anonymous structs, yes, sure. Why not take a look at the code
yourself?

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

[dreamAnders]

On May 13, 1:18 am, [e-mail] (Richard Tobin) wrote:

In article <[e-mail]>,

dreamAnders <[e-mail]:

Thank you very much for tesing the compiler. I have corrected the bugs.

That was quick!

But I still find the conditional operator doesn't work when the
second operand is 0 and the third is a pointer. (It now works
with them the other way round.)

I also have a problem with files that include sys/socket.h (this
is on Linux). I don't know if it's a problem with your compiler as
such or with the compatibility of the header files. I get this
error:

(/usr/include/bits/socket.h,165):error:Expect type specifier or qualifier
(/usr/include/bits/socket.h,165):error:Expect ;
(/usr/include/bits/socket.h,165):error:Expect type specifier or qualifier
(/usr/include/bits/socket.h,166):error:Undeclared identifier: __uint64_t

-- Richard
--
:wq

I checked the conditional operator problem and found the problem:a
typo error, shame me.
And for the socket.h, __uint64_t is the keyword in gcc, not in ucc.
Now ucc can't support 64bit.

And ucc does support a tricky method to work around these extensions
provided by gcc and vc.
If you will check the win32.c under driver, you will find the trick.

ucc can pass -keyword __uint64_t to ucl and add one line on the
keyword.h under ucl, the __uint64_t will work.
(Ugly, but now works)

[Richard Heathfield]

dreamAnders said:

<snip>

>
I checked the conditional operator problem and found the problem:a
typo error, shame me.

No shame at all. Your attitude to bug reports is commendably positive.

Now, I know you like anonymous unions, and I understand that you want to
support them in your compiler, and that's fine - but *using* them in your
compiler prevents me from compiling the compiler itself, because /my/
compiler doesn't support them.

Is there any likelihood that you will be releasing a version of the code
that does not require the host compiler to support anonunions?

I understand that you don't currently supply headers or a library, relying
on the host environment to supply these. Again, that's fine - but if you
were to make your compiler's source code conform to ANSI C (and especially
to the 1989 ANSI (1990 ISO) Standard), you *might* find that some people
in comp.lang.c would be very willing to help you fill that gap.

<snip>

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

[dreamAnders]

On 5ÔÂ13ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç5ʱ00·Ö, Richard Heathfield <[e-mail]:

dreamAnders said:

<snip>

I checked the conditional operator problem and found the problem:a
typo error, shame me.

No shame at all. Your attitude to bug reports is commendably positive.

Now, I know you like anonymous unions, and I understand that you want to
support them in your compiler, and that's fine - but *using* them in your
compiler prevents me from compiling the compiler itself, because /my/
compiler doesn't support them.

Is there any likelihood that you will be releasing a version of the code
that does not require the host compiler to support anonunions?

I understand that you don't currently supply headers or a library, relying
on the host environment to supply these. Again, that's fine - but if you
were to make your compiler's source code conform to ANSI C (and especially
to the 1989 ANSI (1990 ISO) Standard), you *might* find that some people
in comp.lang.c would be very willing to help you fill that gap.

<snip>

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

That's great! I wish that some people in comp.lang.c to help me fill
that gap very much.
I will try to set up the developer community and evolve the project.

[Walter Banks]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

I don't see why. If I wanted to write a compiler for some arbitrary
language X, I'd almost certainly choose C to do it, rather than X. So why
someone else can't choose to write a C compiler in language X rather than
C is beyond me.

C might not be the best language to implement a compiler in. C's weak typing
for example.

ucc is written in C as you have pointed out. It is an interesting project
that takes compilers back to some fundaments. Wenjun Wang is to be
commended for a nice piece of work.

Increasingly I expect we are going to see home grown Asian development
tools like ucc appearing.

Regards,

--
Walter Banks
Byte Craft Limited
Tel. [phone]
http://www.bytecraft.com
wa****@bytecraft.com

[CBFalconer]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

CBFalconer said:

<snip>

>If one _needs_ some peculiar MS stuff to compile it,

It doesn't. gcc compiles most of it just fine. My version barfs on
anonymous structs, but I guess I could go fix those if I cared enough.

>can it possibly be written in C, as understood in this newsgroup?

Modulo the anonymous structs, yes, sure. Why not take a look at the
code yourself?

Well, I had it lined up to download, but when I saw the messages
about total lack of comment, and then need for MS stuff, I took it
down.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Gene]

On May 11, 11:41*am, "[e-mail]"
<[e-mail]:

On May 11, 11:36*am, "[e-mail]"

<[e-mail]:

On May 10, 9:15*pm, dreamAnders <[e-mail]:

ucc is an ANSI C Compiler. Its code size is about 15,000 lines.
The lexer, parser and code generator are all hand-written.
The code structure is very clear and straightforward. And there is an
interesting value numbering algorithm.
It also has a document explaining the internal implementation.
If you are interested at this compiler, you can download it fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/ucc, which will help you to master the
C language.

Congratulations. I hope this project will evolve quickly.

Also, I don't really like the fact that one must have Ms Studio to
compile the compiler :) Can't you distribute binaries?

You guys are real pieces of work. (I've replied only to the most
egregious.) This is obviously an initial offering of a substantial
personal project with lots of potential. The code really is a marvel
of clarity. (It reminds me of http://www.t3x.org/bits/s9fes/. And I
commend the literate programming style/tools of s9fes to
dreamAnders.)

Give the guy a break. Celebrate the new resource and--if you see fit
to criticize--do so with contributions that fix the apparent bugs or
omissions.

Jeez...

[dreamAnders]

On May 14, 8:32 am, Gene <[e-mail]:

On May 11, 11:41 am, "[e-mail]"

<[e-mail]:

On May 11, 11:36 am, "[e-mail]"

<[e-mail]:

On May 10, 9:15 pm, dreamAnders <[e-mail]:

ucc is an ANSI C Compiler. Its code size is about 15,000 lines.
The lexer, parser and code generator are all hand-written.
The code structure is very clear and straightforward. And there is an
interesting value numbering algorithm.
It also has a document explaining the internal implementation.
If you are interested at this compiler, you can download it fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/ucc, which will help you to master the
C language.

Congratulations. I hope this project will evolve quickly.

Also, I don't really like the fact that one must have Ms Studio to
compile the compiler :) Can't you distribute binaries?

You guys are real pieces of work. (I've replied only to the most
egregious.) This is obviously an initial offering of a substantial
personal project with lots of potential. The code really is a marvel
of clarity. (It reminds me ofhttp://www.t3x.org/bits/s9fes/. And I
commend the literate programming style/tools of s9fes to
dreamAnders.)

Give the guy a break. Celebrate the new resource and--if you see fit
to criticize--do so with contributions that fix the apparent bugs or
omissions.

Jeez...

Thanks a lot. The literate programming style/tools is interesting.

[dreamAnders]

On May 13, 10:07 pm, CBFalconer <[e-mail]:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

CBFalconer said:

<snip>

If one _needs_ some peculiar MS stuff to compile it,

It doesn't. gcc compiles most of it just fine. My version barfs on
anonymous structs, but I guess I could go fix those if I cared enough.

can it possibly be written in C, as understood in this newsgroup?

Modulo the anonymous structs, yes, sure. Why not take a look at the
code yourself?

Well, I had it lined up to download, but when I saw the messages
about total lack of comment, and then need for MS stuff, I took it
down.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**

Thank you for downloading. Well there is nearly no comments, but I
assure
you the code clarity is my important concern when writing the code.
I will add more comments later. When using on Windows, it needs MS
stuff.
btw, there are many students using MS stuff on China.

I need to set up a web about ucc as soon as possible. And I already
used subversion.
I hope there are people who will join the developer community to help
it grow.

[Noob]

dreamAnders wrote:

btw, there are many students using MS stuff on China.

Tell them to give Red Flag Linux a try.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Flag_Linux
(Don't waste your time on MS stuff.)