ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995 amendment and C++03

[Ioannis Vranos]

Does C++03 include the C programming language ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995
amendment?

[Victor Bazarov]

Ioannis Vranos wrote:

Does C++03 include the C programming language ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995
amendment?

Yes, it does. You still haven't got yourself a copy, have you?

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[Andrew Koenig]

"Ioannis Vranos" <iv*****@nospam.no.spamfreemail.grwrote in message
news:fo***********@ulysses.noc.ntua.gr...

Does C++03 include the C programming language ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995
amendment?

Yes, in the sense that the library described in that amendment is considered
part of the library that C++ inherits from C.

[red floyd]

Victor Bazarov wrote:

Ioannis Vranos wrote:

>Does C++03 include the C programming language ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995
amendment?

Yes, it does. You still haven't got yourself a copy, have you?

Victor, it's damned near impossible to find the 1990/1995 version of the
standard. Searching on both ANSI and ISO's sites only gives the 1999
version. The dead tree version from BSI (Wiley Press) is also the 1999
version.

[Victor Bazarov]

red floyd wrote:

[..]
I was trying to get the C90 or C95 Standard for the library reference.

Ah... Well, I don't know what to tell you. Contact a live person at
ANSI and see if you could purchase an outdated version of a standard
from them. Nobody else would have a legitimate copy to sell you. If
you can find a draft version somewhere, it might be as good as getting
a real thing. Ask in comp.std.c.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask