_ultoa radix??

[Kevin Doyle]

Hi I just found this macro.
I want to convert a dword to string using this _ultoa but I don't understand
the radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?
Cheers,
Kevin.

[Kevin Goodsell]

Kevin Doyle wrote:

Hi I just found this macro.
What macro?
I want to convert a dword
No such thing in standard C++.
to string using this _ultoa
No such thing in standard C++.
but I don't understand
the radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

Don't know. Not standard C++.

It looks like you forgot to read the welcome message before posting.

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Kevin Doyle]

Would you please go and post in the moderated NG.
You are quite annoying.

"Kevin Goodsell" <us*********************@neverbox.com> wrote in message
news:Wm****************@newsread4.news.pas.earthli nk.net...

Kevin Doyle wrote:

Hi I just found this macro.

What macro?

I want to convert a dword

No such thing in standard C++.

to string using this _ultoa

No such thing in standard C++.

but I don't understand
the radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

Don't know. Not standard C++.

It looks like you forgot to read the welcome message before posting.

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Mike Wahler]

Kevin Doyle <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:Gt*******************@news.indigo.ie...

Would you please go and post in the moderated NG.
You are quite annoying.

Not nearly as annoying as those who post off-topic
questions, top-post, and post the same message separately
to more than one group instead of crossposting.

I've answered this same question you posted to
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++ in that group.

-Mike

[Andre Kostur]

"Kevin Doyle" <[e-mail]> wrote in
news:7c*******************@news.indigo.ie:

Hi I just found this macro.
I want to convert a dword to string using this _ultoa but I don't
understand the radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

I'm afraid you're going to have to look it up in your compiler's
documentation. _ultoa is a platform-specific function. Although assuming
that the implementor is sane, I doubt that any value passed in for radix
would modify the input value (I'm not entirely sure what you mean by: "not
to effect the value being converted"".

[Kevin Goodsell]

Kevin Doyle wrote:

Would you please go and post in the moderated NG.
You are quite annoying.

Because I'm feeling exceptionally generous today, I will not killfile
you just yet, nor will I notify your service provider's abuse department
about your abusive and insistently off-topic messages. You have one more
chance (though experience shows that people like you almost always blow
such a chance). If you have a C++ question or issue, you may find me and
the other members of this group to be a very valuable resource. But we
don't respond well to trolling, off-topic posting, unwarranted insults,
or poor netiquette.

HTH. HAND.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Oliver S.]

> ... nor will I notify your service provider's abuse department ...

I think no abuse-department cares about this minior "abuse".

[Oliver S.]

> Hi I just found this macro.

_ultoa is not a macro.

what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

Use 10 for decimal output and 16 for hex-output.

[Kevin Goodsell]

Oliver S. wrote:

... nor will I notify your service provider's abuse department ...

I think no abuse-department cares about this minior "abuse".

You're probably right, but in the past people with similar attitudes and
behavior have escalated their behavior to the point that it's quite
clearly in violation of the service provider's terms of service. I guess
we'll see what happens in this case.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Kevin Doyle wrote:

I just found this macro.
I want to convert a dword to string using this _ultoa
but I don't understand the radix part of the function.
What value of radix should I use
so as not to effect the value being converted?

I see that you've met our off-topic cops
and other indigenous trolls.

I used Google

http://www.google.com/

to search for

+"ultoa"

and found lots of stuff.

It isn't standard but implementations that do support it
require you to include cstdlib (or stdlib.h).
Good Luck and please don't hesitate to ask again
if you have any questions about C++.

[Stephen Howe]

> Not nearly as annoying as those who ...top-post

Yet bottom-posters fail to prune unnecessary verbiage - a much much more
grevious sin.
Better those who top-post and prune than bottom-post and no prune.

Stephen Howe

[Stephen Howe]

> Because I'm feeling exceptionally generous today

Yes, what an incredibly generous offer on your part. I am overwhelmed by
your magnaminity.
He has only posted 2 messages not half a dozen.

Stephen Howe

[Kevin Goodsell]

Stephen Howe wrote:

Not nearly as annoying as those who ...top-post

Yet bottom-posters fail to prune unnecessary verbiage - a much much more
grevious sin.
Better those who top-post and prune than bottom-post and no prune.

I've almost never seen a top-poster prune.

Straight bottom-posting is not considered good, either. It's marginally
better than top-posting. The proper reply format is, of course, to leave
only the relevant context and place each section of the reply (perhaps
only one section) immediately below the section it pertains to.
"Bottom-posting" usually refers to the practice of quoting the entire
message and adding new text to the bottom.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Stephen Howe]

> > Yes, what an incredibly generous offer on your part. I am overwhelmed by

your magnaminity.
I think I'd be insulted, if that were a word.

Swop 2nd n and m, I was typing fast.
It's half a dozen by my count.

Really? Google disagrees. It is 2 like I claimed. Check here in Google
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe...ltoa&lr=&hl=en
You will only find 2 posts by Kevin Doyle on subject "_ultoa radix??",
exactly what I stated. Where are your 6 by Kevin Doyle?

Stephen Howe

[Tim Slattery]

"Kevin Doyle" <[e-mail]> wrote:

Hi I just found this macro.
I want to convert a dword to string using this _ultoa but I don't understand
the radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

1. Don't use _ultoa, use the Format method of CString with the %u
format specifier

2. Don't post Windows or MS VC++ specific questions here. A much
better place is the microsoft.public.vc.* hierarchy hosted on the
msnews.microsoft.com server.

--
Tim Slattery
Sl********@bls.gov

[Mike Wahler]

Tim Slattery <Sl********@bls.gov> wrote in message
news:vt********************************@4ax.com...

"Kevin Doyle" <[e-mail]> wrote:

Hi I just found this macro.
I want to convert a dword to string using this _ultoa but I don't understandthe radix part of the function.
what value of radix should I use so as not to effect the value being
converted?

1. Don't use _ultoa, use the Format method of CString with the %u
format specifier

2. Don't post Windows or MS VC++ specific questions here.

Please don't post Windows or MS specific answers either.
'CString' is not part of C++.

-Mike

[Default User]

Stephen Howe wrote:

Not nearly as annoying as those who ...top-post

Yet bottom-posters fail to prune unnecessary verbiage - a much much more
grevious sin.
Better those who top-post and prune than bottom-post and no prune.

I agree in principle that many people (including some regulars here) do
a poor job of trimming. However, I've seldom seen a top-poster that
trimmed anything.


Brian Rodenborn

[Default User]

Stephen Howe wrote:

Really? Google disagrees. It is 2 like I claimed. Check here in Google

He posted to more than one thread.


Brian Rodenborn

[Kevin Goodsell]

Default User wrote:

Stephen Howe wrote:

Really? Google disagrees. It is 2 like I claimed. Check here in Google

He posted to more than one thread.

He also posted using more than 1 name.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...news.indigo.ie

For what it's worth Stephen, I apologize if I've offended you. My
tolerance for people who show no respect for the group is low, and I
tend to show little or no respect for them.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.