Defect Report : numeric_limits::is_modulo insufficently defined.

[Azumanga]

18.2.1.2 55 states that "A type is modulo if it is possible to add two
positive numbers together and have a result that wraps around to a
third number that is less".

This seems insufficent for the following reasons:

1) Doesn't define what that value recieved is.
2) Doesn't state the result is repeatable
3) Doesn't require that doing addition, subtraction and other
operations on all values is defined behaviour.

Suggest this text is ammeded to:

"A type is modulo if, given any operation involving +,- or * on values
of that type whose value would fall outside the range [min(), max()],
then the value returned differs from the true value by an integer
multiple of (max() - min() + 1) "

[mlimber]

Azumanga wrote:

18.2.1.2 55 states that "A type is modulo if it is possible to add two
positive numbers together and have a result that wraps around to a
third number that is less".

This seems insufficent for the following reasons:

1) Doesn't define what that value recieved is.
2) Doesn't state the result is repeatable
3) Doesn't require that doing addition, subtraction and other
operations on all values is defined behaviour.

Suggest this text is ammeded to:

"A type is modulo if, given any operation involving +,- or * on values
of that type whose value would fall outside the range [min(), max()],
then the value returned differs from the true value by an integer
multiple of (max() - min() + 1) "

You probably meant to post in comp.std.c++.

Cheers! --M

[Marcus Kwok]

Azumanga <4z******@gmail.comwrote:

18.2.1.2 55 states that "A type is modulo if it is possible to add two
positive numbers together and have a result that wraps around to a
third number that is less".

This seems insufficent for the following reasons:

1) Doesn't define what that value recieved is.
2) Doesn't state the result is repeatable
3) Doesn't require that doing addition, subtraction and other
operations on all values is defined behaviour.

Suggest this text is ammeded to:

"A type is modulo if, given any operation involving +,- or * on values
of that type whose value would fall outside the range [min(), max()],
then the value returned differs from the true value by an integer
multiple of (max() - min() + 1) "

There is a discussion on this topic over on comp.std.c++:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....bfd3c42666b5d/

--
Marcus Kwok
Replace 'invalid' with 'net' to reply

[Azumanga]

mlimber wrote:

Azumanga wrote:

18.2.1.2 55 states that "A type is modulo if it is possible to add two
positive numbers together and have a result that wraps around to a
third number that is less".

This seems insufficent for the following reasons:

1) Doesn't define what that value recieved is.
2) Doesn't state the result is repeatable
3) Doesn't require that doing addition, subtraction and other
operations on all values is defined behaviour.

Suggest this text is ammeded to:

"A type is modulo if, given any operation involving +,- or * on values
of that type whose value would fall outside the range [min(), max()],
then the value returned differs from the true value by an integer
multiple of (max() - min() + 1) "

You probably meant to post in comp.std.c++.

Yes I did. Woops. Sorry!

Chris