Visual C++ = Microsoft -Microsoft = monopol -monopol = contracts
with large companies (and small ones too). Get it?
Plus, if we get down to the very functionalities of the two mentioned
IDEs:
- Visual C++ (or simply Visual Studio as its now called) will ALWAYS
have better up-to-date support for .NET framework, since the framework
is written by the same companies developers
- Visual Studio is starting to include more and more tools for project
leading and organization of any stage in development of an application
including debugging etc. which is becoming more and more important to
reach a high speed of delivering products in the market and todays
bussiness world is all about speed and competivness
- Visual Studio has currently the best code debugger ever, and
debugging represents 70% of development time, so this means a great
improvement in speed again
greets,
Ivan Leben
dktekno wrote:
I have long wondered what the reason is that the majority of companies chose
Visual C++ instead of Borland C++ Builder. In my opinion, C++ Builder or
Delphi gives you a much more easy understanding of your own programs, and
more flexibility in how to operate everything. What is the reason people use
Visual C++ instead of C++ Builder?
Visual C++ is slowy, and when I am designing programs, I don't have the same
kind of freedom to move around my windows and forms like I can in Delphi.
What are the reasons C++ Builder is not appreciated as Visual C++ and the
alike?