I have some very simple code fragment:
short int n1, n2;
....
n1 += n2;
I get an warning from VS2003 - VS2005: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion
from 'int' to 'short', possible loss of data
n1 = n1 + n2;
Here I don't get the warning. Strange...
I'm using warning level 4. Is this "VC++ specific" or conformant to the
standard?
Greets
--
Henryk
11  1725 
On 7 Feb 2006 06:12:57 -0800, "Henryk" <he************@gmx.de> wrote: I have some very simple code fragment:
short int n1, n2;
...
n1 += n2;
I get an warning from VS2003 - VS2005: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion
from 'int' to 'short', possible loss of data
n1 = n1 + n2;
Here I don't get the warning. Strange...
I'm using warning level 4. Is this "VC++ specific" or conformant to the
standard?
I would have expected the warning in both cases. The result of n1 + n2
is of type int according to the type promotion rules.
Best wishes,
Roland Pibinger
"Roland Pibinger" <rp*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43**************@news.utanet.at... n1 += n2;
I get an warning from VS2003 - VS2005: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion
from 'int' to 'short', possible loss of data
n1 = n1 + n2;
Here I don't get the warning. Strange...
I'm using warning level 4. Is this "VC++ specific" or conformant to the
standard?
I would have expected the warning in both cases. The result of n1 + n2
is of type int according to the type promotion rules.
Why?
Duane Hebert wrote: "Roland Pibinger" <rp*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43**************@news.utanet.at...
n1 += n2;
I get an warning from VS2003 - VS2005: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion
from 'int' to 'short', possible loss of data
n1 = n1 + n2;
Here I don't get the warning. Strange...
I'm using warning level 4. Is this "VC++ specific" or conformant to the
standard?
I would have expected the warning in both cases. The result of n1 + n2
is of type int according to the type promotion rules.
Why?
I guess I don't understand the question. Why what? Why the promotions
are performed on both operands? Because the Standard says so (5/9). Or
why is it so in the Standard? I am not sure, ask in comp.std.c++.
V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:0c***************@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.ve rio.net... I guess I don't understand the question. Why what? Why the promotions
are performed on both operands? Because the Standard says so (5/9). Or
why is it so in the Standard? I am not sure, ask in comp.std.c++.
Sorry for the unclear question. I wanted to know if the standard required
addition of two shorts to be promoted to an int. I know if the two are
different
sizes, they're promoted to the size of the larger.
Thanks.
Duane Hebert wrote: "Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:0c***************@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.ve rio.net...
I guess I don't understand the question. Why what? Why the promotions
are performed on both operands? Because the Standard says so (5/9). Or
why is it so in the Standard? I am not sure, ask in comp.std.c++.
Sorry for the unclear question. I wanted to know if the standard required
addition of two shorts to be promoted to an int.
Yes, that's how I read 5/9, the fourth bullet item.
I know if the two are
different
sizes, they're promoted to the size of the larger.
The Standard does not make it conditional. Both operands shall be
promoted. That means if 'int' can accommodate them, they will be made
'int'. If 'int' can't accommodate either of them, that one will be made
'unsigned int'. Then if one of them is 'unsigned' and the other isn't,
they are both made 'unsigned'.
V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:9w***************@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.ve rio.net... The Standard does not make it conditional. Both operands shall be
promoted. That means if 'int' can accommodate them, they will be made
'int'. If 'int' can't accommodate either of them, that one will be made
'unsigned int'. Then if one of them is 'unsigned' and the other isn't,
they are both made 'unsigned'.
Thanks.
Thank you all,
I thought that the promotion occures to the largest type of all
operands involved.
The question is why I do get this warning only for the += (and possibly
for -= and others too) but not for the explizit operations.
I did not use a pendatic warning level before, but for the current
project I have to. So I was not aware of this problem.
This project contains a lot of algorithm stuff with mathematical
operations. The compiler would have to produce tons of warnings
according to the promotion rules. But I only get a few from this += ...
Btw, is there a good online source for the C++ Standard? I just
downloaded a pdf from open-std.org but it seems not up-to-date (its
from 2001).
Victor Bazarov wrote: Duane Hebert wrote: "Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:0c***************@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.ve rio.net...
I guess I don't understand the question. Why what? Why the promotions
are performed on both operands? Because the Standard says so (5/9). Or
why is it so in the Standard? I am not sure, ask in comp.std.c++.
Sorry for the unclear question. I wanted to know if the standard required
addition of two shorts to be promoted to an int.
Yes, that's how I read 5/9, the fourth bullet item.
But the fourth bullet directs to 4.5, and 4.5/1 reads:
"An rvalue of type char, signed char, unsigned char, short int, or
unsigned short int **can** be converted to an rvalue of type int if int
can represent all the values of the source type; otherwise, the source
rvalue **can** be converted to an rvalue of type unsigned int."
(the ** are mine)
As I interpret it, it is not *required* it is a possibility. Please,
correct me if I am wrong.
[snip]
TIA,
Marcelo Pinto
Marcelo Pinto wrote: Victor Bazarov wrote:
Duane Hebert wrote:
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:0c***************@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to .verio.net...
I guess I don't understand the question. Why what? Why the promotions
are performed on both operands? Because the Standard says so (5/9). Or
why is it so in the Standard? I am not sure, ask in comp.std.c++.
Sorry for the unclear question. I wanted to know if the standard required
addition of two shorts to be promoted to an int.
Yes, that's how I read 5/9, the fourth bullet item.
But the fourth bullet directs to 4.5, and 4.5/1 reads:
"An rvalue of type char, signed char, unsigned char, short int, or
unsigned short int **can** be converted to an rvalue of type int if int
can represent all the values of the source type; otherwise, the source
rvalue **can** be converted to an rvalue of type unsigned int."
(the ** are mine)
As I interpret it, it is not *required* it is a possibility. Please,
correct me if I am wrong.
Subclause 4.5 shows _how_ it's done *if* it's done. 5/9 requires that it
_shall_ be done. Read it again.
V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail
Henryk wrote: [..]
Btw, is there a good online source for the C++ Standard? I just
downloaded a pdf from open-std.org but it seems not up-to-date (its
from 2001).
Please look in the FAQ.
V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail
Victor Bazarov escreveu: Marcelo Pinto wrote:
But the fourth bullet directs to 4.5, and 4.5/1 reads:
"An rvalue of type char, signed char, unsigned char, short int, or
unsigned short int **can** be converted to an rvalue of type int if int
can represent all the values of the source type; otherwise, the source
rvalue **can** be converted to an rvalue of type unsigned int."
(the ** are mine)
As I interpret it, it is not *required* it is a possibility. Please,
correct me if I am wrong.
Subclause 4.5 shows _how_ it's done *if* it's done. 5/9 requires that it
_shall_ be done. Read it again.
V
--
Yes, I see it now, thank you.
Marcelo Pinto This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: victor75040 |
last post by:
Before you all start flaming me, I am not a student and this is not
for any homework. Just someone learing c++ on their own.
I am now up to the chapter in my book that describes operator...
|
by: cppaddict |
last post by:
Hi,
Is it considered bad form to have the subscript operator return a
const reference variable? If not, what is the proper way to do it?
My question was prompted by the code below, my...
|
by: Glen Herrmannsfeldt |
last post by:
I was compiling a program written by someone else about six years ago, and
widely distributed at the time. It also includes makefiles for many
different systems, so I know it has been compiled...
|
by: NilsNilsson |
last post by:
I wrote this:
short s1 = 0;
short s2 = 1;
short s3 = s1 + s2;
And gor this compile error message: Cannot implicitly convert type 'int' to
'short'
What is wrong here?
|
by: seb666fr2 |
last post by:
hello,
Anybody can tell me why it is impossible to use the '&' operator
with operands of type 'long' or 'ulong' and what i must use instead
of this?
thanks.
|
by: cody |
last post by:
Why can I overload operator== and operator!= separately having different
implementations and additionally I can override equals() also having a
different implementation.
Why not forbid...
|
by: Norman Diamond |
last post by:
In an antique obsolete version of MFC, a CString expression could be
subscripted in order to retrieve one element.
Visual Studio 2005 defines CSimpleStringT::operator. At first glance it
looks...
|
by: email7373388 |
last post by:
I'm working on a program which has a strange operator, :>. This is
the syntax:
((unsigned short)( var1)):>((void __near *)( var2 ))
Any clue?
|
by: Thomas Lenz |
last post by:
The code below should allow to use a comma instead of << with ostreams and
include a space between two operands when comma is used. e.g.
cout << "hello", "world", endl;
should print the line...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
| |
