On 3 Feb 2006 01:54:07 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "Ali"
<ab********@gmail.com> wrote:
I imagine you tried the -S flag?Yeah , i was really missing this! thanks Grumble.
No. Some compilers do translate directly from intermediate representation to binary code.
To me any reasonable compiler writter should not skip this step
Why, for goodness' sake ? Why shouldn't a compiler convert directly to
binary?I don't know what you mean by "extra stuff"
It means *not* providing -S option for object dump. Isn't simple to
understand?
If you mean that, then write it, don't write so cryptically that
people don't understand you.
but your question really doesn't have much to do with the C programming language.
Come on i got the solution here and you are saying that its not right
place to ask such question;-)
You could ask an axe murderer for a recipe for cookies, and maybe
you'd get one, but that doesn't mean he's the right person to ask.
Infact this post is related to C.
No, its not. Its related to how a toolset might behave, which is
nothing to do with the C Language, the topic here.
Mark McIntyre
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----