if and for statements

[Paminu]

is this:
....
....
....
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j) a++;
j <<= 2;
}

return (a & 1);
....
....
....

the same as:
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j)
{
a++;
}

j <<= 2;

}

return (a & 1);

[mario.demiguel]

Yes

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

ma************@gmail.com wrote:

Yes

It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the text you are replying to.
To do this using Google groups, please follow the instructions below,
penned by Keith Thompson:

If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[Default User]

ma************@gmail.com wrote:

Yes

Yes, what?

--
Please quote enough of the previous message for context. To do so from
Google, click "show options" and use the Reply shown in the expanded
header.

[Keith Thompson]

"Default User" <de***********@yahoo.com> writes:

ma************@gmail.com wrote:

Yes

Yes, what?

Yes, Sir?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[Kenneth Brody]

Paminu wrote:

is this: [... code that differs only at ...]
if (arg & j) a++;
[...and...]
if (arg & j)
{
a++;
}

[... the same? ...]

Yes.

--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include <std_disclaimer.h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:Th*************@gmail.com>

[Barry Schwarz]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:45:44 +0200, Paminu <ja******@asd.com> wrote:

is this:
...
...
...
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j) a++;
j <<= 2;
}

return (a & 1);
...
...
...

the same as:
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j)
{
a++;
}
Yes. If the "range" of the if is a single statement, the braces are
optional.

j <<= 2;

}

return (a & 1);

<<Remove the del for email>>

[Peter Shaggy Haywood]

Groovy hepcat Keith Thompson was jivin' on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:46:43
GMT in comp.lang.c.
Re: if and for statements's a cool scene! Dig it!

"Default User" <de***********@yahoo.com> writes:

ma************@gmail.com wrote:

Yes

Yes, what?

Yes, Sir?

Yes, Sir, three bags full, Sir. :)

--

Dig the even newer still, yet more improved, sig!

http://alphalink.com.au/~phaywood/
"Ain't I'm a dog?" - Ronny Self, Ain't I'm a Dog, written by G. Sherry & W. Walker.
I know it's not "technically correct" English; but since when was rock & roll "technically correct"?

[pete]

Peter Shaggy Haywood wrote:

Groovy hepcat Keith Thompson was jivin' on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:46:43
GMT in comp.lang.c.
Re: if and for statements's a cool scene! Dig it!

"Default User" <de***********@yahoo.com> writes:

ma************@gmail.com wrote:

Yes

Yes, what?

Yes, Sir?

Yes, Sir, three bags full, Sir. :)

One for the little boy who lives down the drain.

"Lane" was not in my vocabulary when I learned this.

--
pete