In article <19**************************@posting.google.com >,
Harald Korneliussen wrote:
"Peter Pichler" <pi*****@pobox.sk> wrote in message news:<4020324b_1@mk-nntp- Not wanting to defend Mr ERT, I must regretfully say that most GPL code I
have seen looks worse. Moreover it is usually highly non-portable. Is there
a clause in GPL that I missed that says that the source must be unreadable?
Ah, I'm relieved to hear it's not just me. I _though_ C didn't have to
look like that.
Do you have any good counterexamples? I'd like to take a look at some
real quality C code someday.
IMHO, Busybox and the Linux kernel each contain a lot of high-quality
C code. Being real-world projects with contributions from many people,
they _also_ contain a lot of hack-quality code and system extensions
from standard C. I trust you will be able to tell which is which. ;-)
- Larry