what is file scope?

[Vipul Jain]

Can any one please tell me what is the difference between global
scope of an variable and file scope of an variable.

Vipul

[Victor Bazarov]

"Vipul Jain" <vi*****@yahoo.com> wrote...

Can any one please tell me what is the difference between global
scope of an variable and file scope of an variable.

None whatsoever.

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Vipul Jain wrote:

Can any one please tell me what is the difference
between global scope and file scope of an variable. cat file.cc

int a = 0; // global scope
static
int b = 0; // file scope

[Unforgiven]

"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:cj**********@nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov...

Vipul Jain wrote:

Can any one please tell me what is the difference between global scope
and file scope of an variable.

> cat file.cc

int a = 0; // global scope
static
int b = 0; // file scope

I don't agree with that. The way I was tought it scope deals only with
visibility of a name in code. Without extra help (an extern declaration),
"a" is visible only within the translation unit file.cc, so it has file
scope. As such, true global scope doesn't exist in C++, and the term global
scope is frequently used to refer to file scope. So as Victor said, there is
no difference.

According to the terminology I know, "a" has external linkage and "b" has
internal linkage, but they both have the same scope (file) and lifetime
(application).

--
Unforgiven

[David Harmon]

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:13:16 -0700 in comp.lang.c++, "E. Robert Tisdale"
<E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote,

Vipul Jain wrote:

Can any one please tell me what is the difference
between global scope and file scope of an variable.

> cat file.cc

int a = 0; // global scope
static
int b = 0; // file scope

Sorry, there is no difference in scope between those two. The names
"a" and "b" are both introduced into the scope in which the declarations
occur.

In a namespace scope (including the global namespace scope), those
declarations illustrate the difference between internal linkage and
external linkage.

In a block scope, those declarations illustrate the difference between
automatic storage duration and static storage duration.

I think Victor had the correct answer.

[E. Robert Tisdale]

David Harmon wrote:

E. Robert Tisdale wrote:

Vipul Jain wrote:

Can any one please tell me what is the difference
between global scope and file scope of an variable.

> cat file.cc

int a = 0; // global scope
static
int b = 0; // file scope

Sorry, there is no difference in scope between those two. The names
"a" and "b" are both introduced into the scope in which the declarations
occur.

In a namespace scope (including the global namespace scope), those
declarations illustrate the difference between internal linkage and
external linkage.

In a block scope, those declarations illustrate the difference between
automatic storage duration and static storage duration.

I think Victor had the correct answer.

I'm sure that you and Victor have the correct answer to some question
but I don't think that was the distinction
that Vipul Jain was looking for.

[Victor Bazarov]

"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote...

David Harmon wrote:

E. Robert Tisdale wrote:

Vipul Jain wrote:

Can any one please tell me what is the difference between global scope
and file scope of an variable.

> cat file.cc
int a = 0; // global scope
static
int b = 0; // file scope

Sorry, there is no difference in scope between those two. The names "a"
and "b" are both introduced into the scope in which the declarations
occur.

In a namespace scope (including the global namespace scope), those
declarations illustrate the difference between internal linkage and
external linkage.

In a block scope, those declarations illustrate the difference between
automatic storage duration and static storage duration.

I think Victor had the correct answer.

I'm sure that you and Victor have the correct answer to some question
but I don't think that was the distinction
that Vipul Jain was looking for.

I suppose you have a working crystal ball then, since you definitely knew
that the OP wanted to know about linkage and not scope. I just can't
imagine that it was you who confused them...

V

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Victor Bazarov wrote:

I suppose you have a working crystal ball then,
since you definitely knew that
the OP wanted to know about linkage and not scope.
I knew no such thing.
But I do know what C and C++ programmers usually mean
when they say "global scope" and I think that you do too.
I just can't imagine that it was you who confused them...

Oh, let's just pretend that I'm confused and *not* Vipul Jain.
Please elaborate for *me*
the difference between scope and linkage.

[Victor Bazarov]

"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote...

Please elaborate for *me*
the difference between scope and linkage.

Get a copy of the Standard and study it.

[David Harmon]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:27:57 -0700 in comp.lang.c++, "E. Robert Tisdale"
<E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote,

Please elaborate for *me* the difference between scope and linkage.

An identifier that can be referred to as ::identifier is in the global
scope (AKA global namespace scope.) You have already shown how such an
identifier can have internal or external linkage.