C / C++ Forum

do the virtual mechanism works when virtual functions are called in constructors?

Hi The long awaited MISRA-C++ will be launched on the 5th of June in London at the Safety Critical Systems Club Tools Event. http://www.safety-club.org.uk/diary.html?opt=detail&id=70 From the 5th of June MISRA-C++ will be available from MISRA

roxio 9 patch administrator http://cracks.12w.net F R E E

On May 16, 9:34 am, Paavo Helde <nob...@ebi.eewrote:

"Roman Mashak" <mrv@tusur.ruwrote in message news:g1m4gu$vf7$1@relay.tomsk.ru... Its better to report failure case as -1, not 0.

Bert wrote: <snip> Basically you should maintain two lists, one for booked seats and the other free ones. For each request scan the free list for the largest sized block greater than the request itself, deduct the appropriate amount and add it to the booked list and update the free list.

kwikius wrote: Ah, that's the trick. I thought I'd need to specify that Derived2 is derived from "Base". Thanks, Ralf

Rahul wrote: B and C must inherit virtually from A. If they don't and you can't modify them, then unfortunately there's no way to do it. (This is because existing compiled code for B and C assume non-virtual inheritance. This compiled code would be different if the inheritance was virtual. Thus changing it to virtual would require...

To make it clear why that is not necessarily true, consider 1. It takes months to produce a Japanese sword that decapitates in less than a second. 2. an optimising compiler that spends an hour fine tuning code that is close to theoretically perfect. The tool is slow but the result is not. It is also possible to optimise code in many...

living with a crack addict http://cracks.12w.net F R E E

On 12 Aug 2008 at 21:30, DiAvOl wrote: Did you mean strrchr?

On 11 Apr., 07:37, cplusplusquest...@gmail.com wrote: While native arrays are perfectly legal C++, I recommend to use one of the standard classes std::vector<or std::valarray<instead. There is no performance penalty in using them and only a very small increase in memory footprint. The benefits by far outweigh the tiny overhead. I would...

Funny mustsee video: Very bad driver parking, and causing traffic jam:D http://videoriporter.hu/vr/fs?content=/vr/player/1144/date/count Maybe the strongest man in the world: http://videoriporter.hu/vr/fs?content=/vr/player/1320/date/count

-de- wrote: What version of GCC are you using? Here, 4.2.1 doesn't warns about anything.. -- Pietro Cerutti

Hear we are providing the information about online jobs.Thousands of Immediate Work at Home Job Openings Now Available! http://home-no1jobs.blogspot.com

CRACK http://softgo.orgfree.com

"Dmitriy V'jukov" <dvyukov@gmail.comwrote in message news:c5199756-8669-419e-84e9-1de582eff02e@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... Are you sure that atomic store with 'memory_order_relaxed' semantics injects a #StoreLoad after the operation? --

Thanks Kai-Uwe. Seems like you are the only one who understood the question :).

InuY4sha <inuy4sha@gmail.comwrites: If your standard is "no more damaging than spam", you should re-think your criteria. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <kst-u@mib.org> Nokia "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:09:32 +1200, Ian Collins wrote: And what if a non-void function intentionally has no return statement, because it's not supposed to ever return? For example, int main(void) which starts up an otherwise infinite loop containing a conditional call to exit()?

faces of war 1a crack http://cracks.12w.net F R E E

On Jul 29, 1:36 pm, Bert <albert.xtheunkno...@gmail.comwrote: <snip top post> Please don't top-post. <http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html> <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>

I wonder if anyone has the Rober Lafore's Object-Oriented Programming in C++ . Please send it to me if you have the electronic versian. Thanks

In article <k2mu34tkv26f6c8h0qn3o0jksr1mod4rcm@4ax.com>, Jack Klein <jackklein@spamcop.netwrote: What's unportable about it? It will cause the compilation to fail if the types are unavailable or are implemented wrongly, which is presumably the idea. -- Richard

C++ and C are different languages with separate groups. Since Sorry, I just think InterlockedDecrement is C, so I post it here. thx