| |
thread by: rajesh kalra |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: ManicQin
do the virtual mechanism works when virtual functions are called in
constructors?
|
thread by: Chris H |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Chris H
Hi
The long awaited MISRA-C++ will be launched on the 5th of June in London
at the Safety Critical Systems Club Tools Event.
http://www.safety-club.org.uk/diary.html?opt=detail&id=70
From the 5th of June MISRA-C++ will be available from MISRA
|
thread by: bvrabcvk |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: bvrabcvk
roxio 9 patch administrator
http://cracks.12w.net
F
R
E
E
|
thread by: James Kanze |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: James Kanze
On May 16, 9:34 am, Paavo Helde <nob...@ebi.eewrote:
|
thread by: Chris Thomasson |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Chris Thomasson
"Roman Mashak" <mrv@tusur.ruwrote in message
news:g1m4gu$vf7$1@relay.tomsk.ru...
Its better to report failure case as -1, not 0.
|
thread by: santosh |
last post Jul 29 '08 by: santosh
Bert wrote:
<snip>
Basically you should maintain two lists, one for booked seats and the
other free ones. For each request scan the free list for the largest
sized block greater than the request itself, deduct the appropriate
amount and add it to the booked list and update the free list.
|
thread by: Ralf Goertz |
last post Aug 7 '08 by: Ralf Goertz
kwikius wrote:
Ah, that's the trick. I thought I'd need to specify that Derived2 is
derived from "Base".
Thanks,
Ralf
|
| |
thread by: Juha Nieminen |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Juha Nieminen
Rahul wrote:
B and C must inherit virtually from A. If they don't and you can't
modify them, then unfortunately there's no way to do it. (This is
because existing compiled code for B and C assume non-virtual
inheritance. This compiled code would be different if the inheritance
was virtual. Thus changing it to virtual would require...
|
thread by: Roedy Green |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Lew
To make it clear why that is not necessarily true, consider
1. It takes months to produce a Japanese sword that decapitates in
less than a second.
2. an optimising compiler that spends an hour fine tuning code that
is close to theoretically perfect. The tool is slow but the result is
not.
It is also possible to optimise code in many...
|
thread by: alkqbsmorai |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: alkqbsmorai
living with a crack addict
http://cracks.12w.net
F
R
E
E
|
thread by: Antoninus Twink |
last post Aug 12 '08 by: Antoninus Twink
On 12 Aug 2008 at 21:30, DiAvOl wrote:
Did you mean strrchr?
|
thread by: Michael.Boehnisch |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Michael.Boehnisch
On 11 Apr., 07:37, cplusplusquest...@gmail.com wrote:
While native arrays are perfectly legal C++, I recommend to use one of
the standard classes std::vector<or std::valarray<instead. There
is no performance penalty in using them and only a very small increase
in memory footprint. The benefits by far outweigh the tiny overhead.
I would...
|
thread by: marosiviki |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: marosiviki
Funny mustsee video: Very bad driver parking, and causing traffic
jam:D
http://videoriporter.hu/vr/fs?content=/vr/player/1144/date/count
Maybe the strongest man in the world:
http://videoriporter.hu/vr/fs?content=/vr/player/1320/date/count
|
thread by: Pietro Cerutti |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Pietro Cerutti
-de- wrote:
What version of GCC are you using?
Here, 4.2.1 doesn't warns about anything..
--
Pietro Cerutti
|
thread by: himana |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: himana
Hear we are providing the information about online jobs.Thousands of
Immediate Work at Home Job Openings Now Available!
http://home-no1jobs.blogspot.com
|
| |
thread by: shkphbypaz |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: shkphbypaz
CRACK
http://softgo.orgfree.com
|
thread by: Chris Thomasson |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Chris Thomasson
"Dmitriy V'jukov" <dvyukov@gmail.comwrote in message
news:c5199756-8669-419e-84e9-1de582eff02e@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
Are you sure that atomic store with 'memory_order_relaxed' semantics injects
a #StoreLoad after the operation?
--
|
thread by: Somebody |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Somebody
Thanks Kai-Uwe. Seems like you are the only one who understood the question
:).
|
thread by: Keith Thompson |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Kenny McCormack
InuY4sha <inuy4sha@gmail.comwrites:
If your standard is "no more damaging than spam", you should re-think
your criteria.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <kst-u@mib.org>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
|
thread by: Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?= |
last post Aug 27 '08 by: Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?=
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:09:32 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
And what if a non-void function intentionally has no return statement,
because it's not supposed to ever return? For example, int main(void)
which starts up an otherwise infinite loop containing a conditional call
to exit()?
|
thread by: chow.tra |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: chow.tra
faces of war 1a crack
http://cracks.12w.net
F
R
E
E
|
thread by: vippstar |
last post Jul 29 '08 by: vippstar
On Jul 29, 1:36 pm, Bert <albert.xtheunkno...@gmail.comwrote:
<snip top post>
Please don't top-post.
<http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
|
thread by: NAU programmers |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Victor Bazarov
I wonder if anyone has the Rober Lafore's Object-Oriented Programming
in C++ . Please send it to me if you have the electronic versian.
Thanks
|
| |
thread by: Richard Tobin |
last post Jun 27 '08 by: Richard Tobin
In article <k2mu34tkv26f6c8h0qn3o0jksr1mod4rcm@4ax.com>,
Jack Klein <jackklein@spamcop.netwrote:
What's unportable about it? It will cause the compilation to
fail if the types are unavailable or are implemented wrongly,
which is presumably the idea.
-- Richard
|
thread by: slackcode |
last post Aug 29 '08 by: slackcode
C++ and C are different languages with separate groups. Since
Sorry, I just think InterlockedDecrement is C, so I post it here. thx
|