On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:37:40 -0400, "Xenos" <do**********@s pamhate.com>
wrote:
Personally, in my job hunting days, I walked out on an interviewer that
presumed to give me a test. I find the practice insulting.
As an occasional interviewer, I find I have to give a test. The first
question asks the applicant to rate their knowledge of C from 1 to 10,
where 1 is "What's C?" and 10 is "I'm Dennis Ritchie". I use this to set
my expectation of the results from the rest of the test.
The test isn't pass/fail - it's for me to get a handle on the person's
knowledge and familiarity with C. Somebody who claims to be an expert but
misses some fairly obvious questions is rated lower than somebody who
rates themselves as middling and answer the same questions the same way.
How else am I to determine whether an individual has the skills I need?
If my software department was a couple hundred people, I wouldn't have to
do this, because if the programmer isn't really good enough, it probably
won't have a major impact, and maybe they can pick up what they need. But
I'm in a small shop and can't afford to be so generous.
That said, I *will* hire somebody who's not quite up to what I'm looking
for, as long as they have the basics and seem to be open and willing to
learn.
--
#include <standard.discl aimer>
_
Kevin D Quitt USA 91387-4454 96.37% of all statistics are made up
Per the FCA, this address may not be added to any commercial mail list