pointer to member's member?

[Georg D.]

hello,

with

struct C
{
string f1;
};

class A
{
C data;
};

what is the best way to pass member pointer to f1
relative to class A, sth. like "&A::data.f 1" ?

---- backgroud:
i'd like to compose classes in following way:

--- generic part ---

// carry some data
class field
{ ...
};

// keep information on (contained) fields
class record_definiti on
{ ...
};

// and perform common actions
class record
{
shared_ptr<reco rd_definition> recdef;
public:
record(shared_p tr<record_defin ition> _recdef) : recdef(_recdef) ...
...
};
---- user's part ----

// here is the data struct
struct data_t
{
field f1;
field f2;
...
};
// here, the data_t is enhanced with
// functionality from record
// my_record provides record definition
// so class record has acces to the fields
class my_record : public record
{
protected: // but could be public as well
data_t data;
};

----
my_record would pass pointers to member's member fields
f1, f2 etc.

TIA,
georg

[Buster]

Georg D. wrote:

with

struct C
{
string f1;
};

class A
{
C data;
};

what is the best way to pass member pointer to f1
relative to class A, sth. like "&A::data.f 1" ?

A pointer-to-member is just that. You can't make one point to a member
of a member. You have to simulate that with two pointers-to-member.

struct string { };

struct C
{
string f1;
};

class A
{
public:
C data;
};

struct pmm
{
pmm (C A::* p, string C::* q) : p (p), q (q) { }
string & dereference_on (A & a) { return a.* p.* q; }
private:
C A::* p;
string C::* q;
};

int main ()
{
A a;
pmm p (& A::data, & C::f1);

string x = p.dereference_o n (a);
// You can overload operators to get "x = a * p", or "x = p (a)", or
// something else, but you cannot get "x = a.* p".
}

--
Regards,
Buster.