WCF is really a framework for exposing .NET funcationality to other systems.
Using WCF, you have a standard way of utilizing different transport
protocols for delivering the data payload.
Prior to WCF, if you wanted to develop a *service* that could be used
heterogeniously, you'd create a Web Service, which had its own way of
setting it up, writing the code and consuming the service. If you wanted a
homogenious architecture, you might use .NET Remoting, which used different
transport protocols than Web Services and required a different way of coding
the client and server pieces.
With WCF, you can utilize whatever transport protocols suit your needs (TCP,
SOAP, MQ), but still build the WCF service the same way, just with some
modifications to the "plumbing".
So, it's not that WCF is "better" than remoting, since the two are directly
comparable. WCF allows you to expose remoting functionality, but in a
standardized way.
-Scott
"AAAAA" <AA***@hotmail.comwrote in message
news:eJ**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Is WCF better than Net remoting??
What are the adventages of WCF??
Thank you
Cesar