How to get global values

[Dom]

In C++ and VB, it is pretty easy to get a global constant, one that
can be used by all modules. I still have a need for this in CSharp,
but there is not easy way to get these. I can't, for example, just
"include" a file of constants.

Is it a good idea to create a class like the following:

class Parameters
{
public string FN_RegisteredServers;
public string FN_Sources;

public Parameters()
{
FN_RegisteredServers = Application.StartupPath + "\
\RegisteredServers.xml";
FN_Sources = Application.StartupPath + "\\Sources.xml";
}
}

Then, when a class needs a parameter, it does the following;

Parameters p = new Parameters ();
string FN_RegisteredServers = p.FN_RegisteredServers;

It just seems wrong that I need a new instance everytime I use it.

Dom

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Dom <do********@gmail.comwrote:

In C++ and VB, it is pretty easy to get a global constant, one that
can be used by all modules. I still have a need for this in CSharp,
but there is not easy way to get these. I can't, for example, just
"include" a file of constants.

<snip>

It just seems wrong that I need a new instance everytime I use it.

Indeed - they should be static instead, so you don't need to create a
new instance. They should also be readonly though. Use a static
constructor to set them up. Alternatively, follow the singleton
pattern:

http://pobox.com/~skeet/csharp/singleton.html

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Garfilone]

On Aug 2, 4:35 am, Dom <[e-mail]:

In C++ and VB, it is pretty easy to get a global constant, one that
can be used by all modules. I still have a need for this in CSharp,
but there is not easy way to get these. I can't, for example, just
"include" a file of constants.

Is it a good idea to create a class like the following:

class Parameters
{
public string FN_RegisteredServers;
public string FN_Sources;

public Parameters()
{
FN_RegisteredServers = Application.StartupPath + "\
\RegisteredServers.xml";
FN_Sources = Application.StartupPath + "\\Sources.xml";
}
}

Then, when a class needs a parameter, it does the following;

Parameters p = new Parameters ();
string FN_RegisteredServers = p.FN_RegisteredServers;

It just seems wrong that I need a new instance everytime I use it.

Dom

just create a static class to store these static global values, a
utility class

[Dom]

On Aug 1, 4:45 pm, Jon Skeet [C# MVP] <[e-mail]:

Dom <[e-mail]:

In C++ and VB, it is pretty easy to get a global constant, one that
can be used by all modules. I still have a need for this in CSharp,
but there is not easy way to get these. I can't, for example, just
"include" a file of constants.

<snip>

It just seems wrong that I need a new instance everytime I use it.

Indeed - they should be static instead, so you don't need to create a
new instance. They should also be readonly though. Use a static
constructor to set them up. Alternatively, follow the singleton
pattern:

http://pobox.com/~skeet/csharp/singleton.html

--
Jon Skeet - <[e-mail]>http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog:http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Thanks for this. Is there any practical reason why I would choose a
static class instead of a singleton?

Dom

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Dom <do********@gmail.comwrote:

Thanks for this. Is there any practical reason why I would choose a
static class instead of a singleton?

If you never need anything other than constants, and don't need to use
the singleton instance for any other purpose, a static class can be
simpler. On the other hand, it can be less extensible later on - using
a singleton, you can often keep the fact that it *is* a singleton away
from quite a lot of other classes, which can make unit testing easier
etc.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too