Found a bug in Remoting / Serialization

[Howard Swope]

I came across an interesting bug I thought I would throw out there. It
occurs when you are remoting a parameter that is of the same type of the
class that is being called for example the first line of the Copy routine
succeeds where the second fails:

class MyType() : MarshalByRefObject
{
private string name;

public MyType()
{
}

public Copy(MyType myType)
{
// succeeds
this.name = myType.Name;

// throws exception if the myType is a remoting proxy
this.name = myType.name;
}

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
}
}

--
Howard Swope [howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom]
Software Engineer
Spitz, Inc [http://www.spitzinc.com]

[jnospamster]

It's not that the method has a 'MyType' parameter:

You cannot access fields of a remoted object. You have to add a set
accessor to the Name property and use the property, not the field, in
the Copy method.

Remoting, IMO, must be used very carefully. There are a lot of gotchas
which can occur.

[Willy Denoyette [MVP]]

Following works for me, what exception is thrown on you?

// rdomas.cs
using System;
using System.Reflection;
namespace Willys {
public class HelloWorldWorker : MarshalByRefObject
{
string s;
public string S
{
get { return s;}
}
public void SayHello(HelloWorldWorker w)
{
this.s = "Hello";
this.s = w.S;
this.s = w.s + " world";
}
}
}

// main.cs
....
public static void Main()
{
AppDomain newDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("Second AppDomain");
HelloWorldWorker remote =
(HelloWorldWorker)newDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwra p("rdomas",
"Willys.HelloWorldWorker");
remote.SayHello(remote);
Console.WriteLine(remote.S);
}

Willy.

"Howard Swope" <howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom> wrote in message
news:uU*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

I came across an interesting bug I thought I would throw out there. It
occurs when you are remoting a parameter that is of the same type of the
class that is being called for example the first line of the Copy routine
succeeds where the second fails:

class MyType() : MarshalByRefObject
{
private string name;

public MyType()
{
}

public Copy(MyType myType)
{
// succeeds
this.name = myType.Name;

// throws exception if the myType is a remoting proxy
this.name = myType.name;
}

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
}
}

--
Howard Swope [howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom]
Software Engineer
Spitz, Inc [http://www.spitzinc.com]

[Howard Swope]

I don't see that in the documentation, but I'll take your word for it. I
wonder why this is so. Obviously the data is there because I can access it
through the property. I guess it is the way that the proxy is wrapping
things up that makes this difficult or is there some other reason that
having direct access to the fields is unwise?

<jn*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

It's not that the method has a 'MyType' parameter:

You cannot access fields of a remoted object. You have to add a set
accessor to the Name property and use the property, not the field, in
the Copy method.

Remoting, IMO, must be used very carefully. There are a lot of gotchas
which can occur.

[Howard Swope]

Well this is interesting. I can access the fields if I marshal by value.

"Howard Swope" <howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom> wrote in message
news:eL**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

I don't see that in the documentation, but I'll take your word for it. I
wonder why this is so. Obviously the data is there because I can access it
through the property. I guess it is the way that the proxy is wrapping
things up that makes this difficult or is there some other reason that
having direct access to the fields is unwise?

<jn*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

It's not that the method has a 'MyType' parameter:

You cannot access fields of a remoted object. You have to add a set
accessor to the Name property and use the property, not the field, in
the Copy method.

Remoting, IMO, must be used very carefully. There are a lot of gotchas
which can occur.

[Willy Denoyette [MVP]]

Please post the whole code, it works for me see my other reply.

Willy.

"Howard Swope" <howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

Well this is interesting. I can access the fields if I marshal by value.

"Howard Swope" <howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom> wrote in message
news:eL**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

I don't see that in the documentation, but I'll take your word for it. I
wonder why this is so. Obviously the data is there because I can access it
through the property. I guess it is the way that the proxy is wrapping
things up that makes this difficult or is there some other reason that
having direct access to the fields is unwise?

<jn*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

It's not that the method has a 'MyType' parameter:

You cannot access fields of a remoted object. You have to add a set
accessor to the Name property and use the property, not the field, in
the Copy method.

Remoting, IMO, must be used very carefully. There are a lot of gotchas
which can occur.

[Ravi]

Hi,
I have a doubt. myType is an instance of class MyType and name is a private
variable within MyType. How can myType.name work?? It has to throw an
exception coz name is private??
Excuse me if I sound absurd.

"Howard Swope" wrote:

I came across an interesting bug I thought I would throw out there. It
occurs when you are remoting a parameter that is of the same type of the
class that is being called for example the first line of the Copy routine
succeeds where the second fails:

class MyType() : MarshalByRefObject
{
private string name;

public MyType()
{
}

public Copy(MyType myType)
{
// succeeds
this.name = myType.Name;

// throws exception if the myType is a remoting proxy
this.name = myType.name;
}

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
}
}

--
Howard Swope [howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom]
Software Engineer
Spitz, Inc [http://www.spitzinc.com]

[Howard Swope]

myType.Name is being called from within a method of MyType. So it should
work and it does from anything but a Remoting proxy. I have been told in
another post that you can't access any fields from Remoting proxy. I
actually swithed MyType over to be Marshal by Value and it is behaving
properly.

"Ravi" <Ra**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:54**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi,
I have a doubt. myType is an instance of class MyType and name is a
private
variable within MyType. How can myType.name work?? It has to throw an
exception coz name is private??
Excuse me if I sound absurd.

"Howard Swope" wrote:

I came across an interesting bug I thought I would throw out there. It
occurs when you are remoting a parameter that is of the same type of the
class that is being called for example the first line of the Copy routine
succeeds where the second fails:

class MyType() : MarshalByRefObject
{
private string name;

public MyType()
{
}

public Copy(MyType myType)
{
// succeeds
this.name = myType.Name;

// throws exception if the myType is a remoting proxy
this.name = myType.name;
}

public string Name
{
get
{
return name;
}
}
}

--
Howard Swope [howardsnewsATspitzincDOTcom]
Software Engineer
Spitz, Inc [http://www.spitzinc.com]

[amrendrakr]

I have a sample code it didn't work for me.

remote object code:

public class Hello:MarshalByRefObject
{
private ProductInfo pf;

public ProductInfo Product
{
get {return pf; }
}

public Hello()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("Constructor");
}

public string PrintHello()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("PrintHello");
pf = new ProductInfo();
pf.ProductID = 1;
pf.ProductXML="<Test>Remoting</Test>";
}
}

[Serializable]
public class ProductInfo //: MarshalByRefObject
{
public Int32 ProductID;
public string ProductXML;
public ArrayList Arr;

public ProductInfo()
{
Arr = new ArrayList();
Arr.Add(new Arr1(1));
}

}//class

client code: [getting exception at 4th line ]
ProductInfo pf;
b1 = h.PrintHello();
pf = h.Product;
this.textBox1.Text = pf.ProductID.ToString();
any clue why getting error.

[Jon Shemitz]

jn*********@gmail.com wrote:

You cannot access fields of a remoted object. You have to add a set
accessor to the Name property and use the property, not the field, in
the Copy method.

I am far from a remoting expert, but I do not believe this is right. I
read (somewhere) in the dox that remote fields are automatically
turned into properties on the proxy.

Naturally, now I can't find an example in any of my remoting code ....

--

www.midnightbeach.com