Hello,
I have a function which communicates with a database:
Public Overloads Sub Create(ByVal name As String, _
ByVal comment As String)
Try
Dim dbBlog As Database = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("MyDB")
Dim dbcBlog As DbCommand =
dbBlog.GetStoredProcCommand("CreateBlog")
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogName", DbType.String, name)
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogComment", DbType.String,
comment)
dbBlog.ExecuteNonQuery(dbcBlog)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
End Sub
This is a function which is inside a library that will be compiled.
My question is how to let the user knows what is the exception?
1. Should I send the ex.string to console?
2. Should I return ex.String by making it a function instead of a sub?
3. Should I throw the exception inside my function? (I am not sure if
this is even necessary. See next question)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
Try
Create("MyBlog", "This is my blog")
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
I really have no idea of how should I do this?
Remember the function is inside a class that will be compiled into a
DLL with the namespace Blogs.
Thanks,
Miguel 4 1955
I would consider using first a global error handler. My personal preference
is to display a generic error message to the user (this is an ASP.NET
application so the web page is your only communication vector with the user)
and mailing the error details to the development team.
You can use a local try block to clean up resources and/or in the rare cases
where the user could really do something about the error.
--
Patrice
"shapper" <md*****@gmail.coma écrit dans le message de news: 11*********************@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.c om...
Hello,
I have a function which communicates with a database:
Public Overloads Sub Create(ByVal name As String, _
ByVal comment As String)
Try
Dim dbBlog As Database = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("MyDB")
Dim dbcBlog As DbCommand =
dbBlog.GetStoredProcCommand("CreateBlog")
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogName", DbType.String, name)
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogComment", DbType.String,
comment)
dbBlog.ExecuteNonQuery(dbcBlog)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
End Sub
This is a function which is inside a library that will be compiled.
My question is how to let the user knows what is the exception?
1. Should I send the ex.string to console?
2. Should I return ex.String by making it a function instead of a sub?
3. Should I throw the exception inside my function? (I am not sure if
this is even necessary. See next question)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
Try
Create("MyBlog", "This is my blog")
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
I really have no idea of how should I do this?
Remember the function is inside a class that will be compiled into a
DLL with the namespace Blogs.
Thanks,
Miguel
On Sep 17, 1:30 pm, "Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/wrote:
I would consider using first a global error handler. My personal preference
is to display a generic error message to the user (this is an ASP.NET
application so the web page is your only communication vector with the user)
and mailing the error details to the development team.
You can use a local try block to clean up resources and/or in the rare cases
where the user could really do something about the error.
--
Patrice
"shapper" <mdmo...@gmail.coma écrit dans le message de news:
1190030292.258375.95...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.c om...
Hello,
I have a function which communicates with a database:
Public Overloads Sub Create(ByVal name As String, _
ByVal comment As String)
Try
Dim dbBlog As Database = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("MyDB")
Dim dbcBlog As DbCommand =
dbBlog.GetStoredProcCommand("CreateBlog")
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogName", DbType.String, name)
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogComment", DbType.String,
comment)
dbBlog.ExecuteNonQuery(dbcBlog)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
End Sub
This is a function which is inside a library that will be compiled.
My question is how to let the user knows what is the exception?
1. Should I send the ex.string to console?
2. Should I return ex.String by making it a function instead of a sub?
3. Should I throw the exception inside my function? (I am not sure if
this is even necessary. See next question)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
Try
Create("MyBlog", "This is my blog")
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
I really have no idea of how should I do this?
Remember the function is inside a class that will be compiled into a
DLL with the namespace Blogs.
Thanks,
Miguel
Hi,
you mean I can display my error as ASP.NET usually displays errors (In
those pages where text is in red)?
How can I do this? Does this has a name so I can look in Google?
Thanks,
Miguel
Try : http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306355/en-us
and see the Application_Error event...
You'll then have a first point where to handle errors. You'll be able to add
then more local code (if you need to do sometying specific either for the
user or to clean up resources before letting the global error handler comes
into play).
--
Patrice
"shapper" <md*****@gmail.coma écrit dans le message de news: 11*********************@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.co m...
On Sep 17, 1:30 pm, "Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/wrote:
I would consider using first a global error handler. My personal
preference
is to display a generic error message to the user (this is an ASP.NET
application so the web page is your only communication vector with the
user)
and mailing the error details to the development team.
You can use a local try block to clean up resources and/or in the rare
cases
where the user could really do something about the error.
--
Patrice
"shapper" <mdmo...@gmail.coma écrit dans le message de news:
1190030292.258375.95...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.c om...
Hello,
I have a function which communicates with a database:
Public Overloads Sub Create(ByVal name As String, _
ByVal comment As String)
Try
Dim dbBlog As Database = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("MyDB")
Dim dbcBlog As DbCommand =
dbBlog.GetStoredProcCommand("CreateBlog")
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogName", DbType.String, name)
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogComment", DbType.String,
comment)
dbBlog.ExecuteNonQuery(dbcBlog)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
End Sub
This is a function which is inside a library that will be compiled.
My question is how to let the user knows what is the exception?
1. Should I send the ex.string to console?
2. Should I return ex.String by making it a function instead of a sub?
3. Should I throw the exception inside my function? (I am not sure if
this is even necessary. See next question)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
Try
Create("MyBlog", "This is my blog")
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
I really have no idea of how should I do this?
Remember the function is inside a class that will be compiled into a
DLL with the namespace Blogs.
Thanks,
Miguel
Hi,
you mean I can display my error as ASP.NET usually displays errors (In
those pages where text is in red)?
How can I do this? Does this has a name so I can look in Google?
Thanks,
Miguel
This is probably the best article on ExceptionHandling do and don'ts. http://blogs.msdn.com/kcwalina/archi...16/396787.aspx
Don't forget, you can write your code like this
Try
//do stuff
Finally
//clean up stuff
End Try
You don't have to use a Catch.
If all you do is this
Try
'do stuff
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw ''notice just a "throw" and not a "throw ex"
end try
then just use a try/finally block
......................
The one place you might consider
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw new UserFriendlyDatabaseException ("The database is currently
down. Please try again later.");
End Try
In this scenario, you create a custom exception. And you are hiding details
from your user, and you are giving them a more generic exception.
Especially on a public website, where you don't want to expose what the
Server/Database name is to the public.
Dont' overdo this, or abuse it. Read the article above and bookmark it.
>
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
"shapper" <md*****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@k79g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
Hello,
I have a function which communicates with a database:
Public Overloads Sub Create(ByVal name As String, _
ByVal comment As String)
Try
Dim dbBlog As Database = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("MyDB")
Dim dbcBlog As DbCommand =
dbBlog.GetStoredProcCommand("CreateBlog")
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogName", DbType.String, name)
dbBlog.AddInParameter(dbcBlog, "@BlogComment", DbType.String,
comment)
dbBlog.ExecuteNonQuery(dbcBlog)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
End Sub
This is a function which is inside a library that will be compiled.
My question is how to let the user knows what is the exception?
1. Should I send the ex.string to console?
2. Should I return ex.String by making it a function instead of a sub?
3. Should I throw the exception inside my function? (I am not sure if
this is even necessary. See next question)
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
throw(ex)
End Try
4. Should I move the Try, Catch block to the main user code like:
Try
Create("MyBlog", "This is my blog")
Catch ex As SqlClient.SqlException
????????
End Try
I really have no idea of how should I do this?
Remember the function is inside a class that will be compiled into a
DLL with the namespace Blogs.
Thanks,
Miguel This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Nicolas Fleury |
last post by:
Hi,
I've made a small utility to re-raise an exception with the same stack
as before with additional information in it. Since I want to keep the
same exception type and that some types have very...
|
by: Old Wolf |
last post by:
1. What is the difference between #include <stdexcept>
and #include <exception> ?
2. Is there a list somewhere of what each standard exception is used
for? either to throw them, or throw...
|
by: Master of C++ |
last post by:
Hi,
I am writing a simulation package in C++, and so far I've written about
8000 lines of code and have about 30 classes. I haven't used C++
exceptions so far (for various reasons). The only two...
|
by: maricel |
last post by:
I have the following base table structure - DDL:
CREATE TABLE "ADMINISTRATOR"."T1" (
"C1" INTEGER NOT NULL )
IN "TEST_TS" ;
ALTER TABLE "ADMINISTRATOR"."T1"
ADD PRIMARY KEY
|
by: craig |
last post by:
I am wondering if there are some best practices for determining a strategy
for using try/catch blocks within an application.
My current thoughts are:
1. The code the initiates any high-level...
| |
by: Kevin Yu |
last post by:
is it a bad programming design to throw exception in the try block then
catch it??
|
by: Vadivel Kumar |
last post by:
I've a problem in handling a custom exception
The following is my custom exception class:
public class AppException : public Exception
{
public AppException (string message, Exception...
|
by: JohnDeHope3 |
last post by:
First let me say that I understand that Asp.Net wraps my exception in an
HttpUnhandledException. I have found a lot of discussion about that on the
web, which was informative, but not helpful. Let...
|
by: Sek |
last post by:
Hi Folks!
I was pondering over a code and noticed that exception handlers were
present in the private, protected as well as public methods. And,
ofcourse, public methods were calling priv/prot...
|
by: Darko Miletic |
last post by:
Recently I wrote a dll in c++ and to simplify the distribution I decided
to link with multithreaded static library (/MT or /MTd option). In debug
everything works fine but in release I get this:
...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence...
| |