Not an apples to apples comparison. DataBinding
is often slower in .NET that writing code to manually
populate controls. Since you can bind to a DataSet,
DataTable, etc. that are disconnected, your question
about connected versus disconnected scenarios
has very little to do with data binding.
Connection pooling in .NET is quite effective
and is the preferred method in web applications
versus keeping connections open through the
page lifecycle and prevent other threads
from grabbing that connection out of the pool.
--
Robbe Morris - 2004-2006 Microsoft MVP C#
Earn money answering .NET questions
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forums/merit.asp
<de*******@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@c74g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
Hello fellow programmers!
My question concerns the scalability of database access. In coldfusion
(or php for that matter) for example, there seems to be only the
connected model for accessing a DB. On the other hand, there is asp.net
2.0, which provides disconnected and connected access.
Question: Would databinding to controls directly, in ASP.NET 2.0
(without the manual coding of ADO.net), be as affective (scalable) as
using the connected data access model in PHP/Coldfusion (which seems to
be the only way to access the db in these languages)?
Thank you for your time and help.
Regards,
Jim Light
