473,289 Members | 2,141 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,289 software developers and data experts.

Bug in .NET Framework compiling C# scripts?

Hi All,

The ASPX file below runs fine in ASP .NET WebMatrix 0.6 under WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1 and .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0.

But if the last scriptString line is eliminated after appending the
closing ">" to the preceding line, the compiler flags that last line in
the browser (Firefox 5.0) with the message:

Compiler Error Message: CS1010: Newline in constant

The same line is flagged immediately in Visual Web Developer 2005 Expr.
Ed., version 8.0.50727.42, with "Newline in constant". VWD also
complains that the final </script> had no matching start tag.

Is this a "universal bug" :-), or are both caused by a bug in the .NET
C# compiler?

An ideas? Is this too trivial to worry about?

TIA,
Richard

========= ASPX start ===========
<%@ Page Language="c#" %>
<script runat="server">

public void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) {

// Form the script that is to be registered at client side.
String scriptString = "";

scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";

if( !this.IsClientScriptBlockRegistered("clientScript" ) )
this.RegisterClientScriptBlock("clientScript", scriptString);
}

</script>
<html>
<head>
<!-- Directive above not orig. -- added by both WebMatrix & WebDev
2005 EE -->
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm" runat="server">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
========== ASPX end ===========

May 16 '06 #1
13 1916
That is not a .Net Framework bug.
The exact same thing happens in Javascript without the .Net Framework being involved.

scriptString builds a JavaScript client function.

Separating the closing tag prevents the Javascript from being interpreted on the fly:
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";
If the JavaScript executed when the page is rendered,
instead of when the button's clicked, you'd have worse problems.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j33g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... Hi All,

The ASPX file below runs fine in ASP .NET WebMatrix 0.6 under WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1 and .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0.

But if the last scriptString line is eliminated after appending the
closing ">" to the preceding line, the compiler flags that last line in
the browser (Firefox 5.0) with the message:

Compiler Error Message: CS1010: Newline in constant

The same line is flagged immediately in Visual Web Developer 2005 Expr.
Ed., version 8.0.50727.42, with "Newline in constant". VWD also
complains that the final </script> had no matching start tag.

Is this a "universal bug" :-), or are both caused by a bug in the .NET
C# compiler?

An ideas? Is this too trivial to worry about?

TIA,
Richard

========= ASPX start ===========
<%@ Page Language="c#" %>
<script runat="server">

public void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) {

// Form the script that is to be registered at client side.
String scriptString = "";

scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";

if( !this.IsClientScriptBlockRegistered("clientScript" ) )
this.RegisterClientScriptBlock("clientScript", scriptString);
}

</script>
<html>
<head>
<!-- Directive above not orig. -- added by both WebMatrix & WebDev
2005 EE -->
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm" runat="server">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
========== ASPX end ===========

May 16 '06 #2
Hi Juan,

Thank you very much for responding to my question.

I checked further on this. I've discovered a few things.

1. Just to reiterate: When the declartion of of the script separates
"</script" and ">" in Test.aspx:
-- the file displays fine in Web Matrix's Design view;
-- runs fine in Web Matrix's associated Web Server; and ultimately
-- displays a form in Firefox which works fine.

2. However, if I double-click Test.aspx, Visual Web Developer comes
up and barfs immediately. Among other things, it flags the line:
scriptString += "</script";
with the complaint:
Cannot switch views: Validation (Internet Explorer 6): Character
'"' is not valid inside closing tags.

3. In an effort to understand your assessment "The exact same thing
happens in Javascript without the .Net Framework being involved", I
composed the HTML file shown below which runs fine in Firefox and IE
(with the closing script tag written normally.)

If you have time, could you take a further look at my experiences and
assess it further.

Again, thanks for taking the time to consider my confusion.

Yours truly,
Richard

=============== Test.html =============
<html>
<head>
<script language=JavaScript>
function DoClick()
{
myForm.show.value='Msg from Btn.DoClick()'
}
</script>
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
=============== Test.html =============


Juan T. Llibre wrote:
That is not a .Net Framework bug.
The exact same thing happens in Javascript without the .Net Framework being involved.

scriptString builds a JavaScript client function.

Separating the closing tag prevents the Javascript from being interpretedon the fly:
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";


If the JavaScript executed when the page is rendered,
instead of when the button's clicked, you'd have worse problems.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j33g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Hi All,

The ASPX file below runs fine in ASP .NET WebMatrix 0.6 under WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1 and .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0.

But if the last scriptString line is eliminated after appending the
closing ">" to the preceding line, the compiler flags that last line in
the browser (Firefox 5.0) with the message:

Compiler Error Message: CS1010: Newline in constant

The same line is flagged immediately in Visual Web Developer 2005 Expr.
Ed., version 8.0.50727.42, with "Newline in constant". VWD also
complains that the final </script> had no matching start tag.

Is this a "universal bug" :-), or are both caused by a bug in the .NET
C# compiler?

An ideas? Is this too trivial to worry about?

TIA,
Richard

========= ASPX start ===========
<%@ Page Language="c#" %>
<script runat="server">

public void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) {

// Form the script that is to be registered at client side.
String scriptString = "";

scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";

if( !this.IsClientScriptBlockRegistered("clientScript" ) )
this.RegisterClientScriptBlock("clientScript", scriptString);
}

</script>
<html>
<head>
<!-- Directive above not orig. -- added by both WebMatrix & WebDev
2005 EE -->
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm" runat="server">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
========== ASPX end ===========


May 16 '06 #3
You need to understand the difference between writing a Javascript block in a file
which will only be rendered and displayed, and writing a Javascript block in a file,
like in ASP and ASP.NET, which needs to be interpreted, compiled and displayed.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g10g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
Hi Juan,

Thank you very much for responding to my question.

I checked further on this. I've discovered a few things.

1. Just to reiterate: When the declartion of of the script separates
"</script" and ">" in Test.aspx:
-- the file displays fine in Web Matrix's Design view;
-- runs fine in Web Matrix's associated Web Server; and ultimately
-- displays a form in Firefox which works fine.

2. However, if I double-click Test.aspx, Visual Web Developer comes
up and barfs immediately. Among other things, it flags the line:
scriptString += "</script";
with the complaint:
Cannot switch views: Validation (Internet Explorer 6): Character
'"' is not valid inside closing tags.

3. In an effort to understand your assessment "The exact same thing
happens in Javascript without the .Net Framework being involved", I
composed the HTML file shown below which runs fine in Firefox and IE
(with the closing script tag written normally.)

If you have time, could you take a further look at my experiences and
assess it further.

Again, thanks for taking the time to consider my confusion.

Yours truly,
Richard

=============== Test.html =============
<html>
<head>
<script language=JavaScript>
function DoClick()
{
myForm.show.value='Msg from Btn.DoClick()'
}
</script>
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
=============== Test.html =============

Juan T. Llibre wrote:
That is not a .Net Framework bug.
The exact same thing happens in Javascript without the .Net Framework being involved.

scriptString builds a JavaScript client function.

Separating the closing tag prevents the Javascript from being interpreted on the fly:
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";


If the JavaScript executed when the page is rendered,
instead of when the button's clicked, you'd have worse problems.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j33g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Hi All,

The ASPX file below runs fine in ASP .NET WebMatrix 0.6 under WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1 and .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0.

But if the last scriptString line is eliminated after appending the
closing ">" to the preceding line, the compiler flags that last line in
the browser (Firefox 5.0) with the message:

Compiler Error Message: CS1010: Newline in constant

The same line is flagged immediately in Visual Web Developer 2005 Expr.
Ed., version 8.0.50727.42, with "Newline in constant". VWD also
complains that the final </script> had no matching start tag.

Is this a "universal bug" :-), or are both caused by a bug in the .NET
C# compiler?

An ideas? Is this too trivial to worry about?

TIA,
Richard

========= ASPX start ===========
<%@ Page Language="c#" %>
<script runat="server">

public void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) {

// Form the script that is to be registered at client side.
String scriptString = "";

scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</script";
scriptString += ">";

if( !this.IsClientScriptBlockRegistered("clientScript" ) )
this.RegisterClientScriptBlock("clientScript", scriptString);
}

</script>
<html>
<head>
<!-- Directive above not orig. -- added by both WebMatrix & WebDev
2005 EE -->
</head>
<body topmargin="20">
<form id="myForm" runat="server">
<input id="show" style="WIDTH: 200px" type="text" />
<input onclick="DoClick()" type="button" value="ClickMe" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
========== ASPX end ===========

May 16 '06 #4
Hi Juan,

Thanks again for responding.

I've got to look at this more closely. I got this example from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
and they don't have the closing script tag separated. I must be doing
something different than their example envisioned.

Regards,
Richard

May 16 '06 #5
Hi Juan,
they don't have the closing script tag separated
I misspoke in the above claim. They have the preceding "<" and "/"
splashed over the tail-ends of the immediately preceding lines.

I thought that was aesthetically displeasing, which is why I combined
them, but then I made tthe minimal change I could to get the thing
working: I demoted the closing ">" to the following line.

Regards,
Richard

Richard wrote: Hi Juan,

Thanks again for responding.

I've got to look at this more closely. I got this example from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
and they don't have the closing script tag separated. I must be doing
something different than their example envisioned.

Regards,
Richard


May 17 '06 #6
Hi, Richard. Thanks for the correction.
This is a scenario which exists since ASP 2.0.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j73g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Hi Juan,
they don't have the closing script tag separated
I misspoke in the above claim. They have the preceding "<" and "/"
splashed over the tail-ends of the immediately preceding lines.

I thought that was aesthetically displeasing, which is why I combined
them, but then I made tthe minimal change I could to get the thing
working: I demoted the closing ">" to the following line.

Regards,
Richard

Richard wrote:
Hi Juan,

Thanks again for responding.

I've got to look at this more closely. I got this example from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
and they don't have the closing script tag separated. I must be doing
something different than their example envisioned.

Regards,
Richard

May 17 '06 #7
Hi Juan,

I've played around a lot more with this and I'd appreciate knowing
whether the results provoke any additional thoughts.

Also, following up on your original suggestion:
You need to understand the difference between writing a Javascript block in a file
which will only be rendered and displayed, and writing a Javascript block in a file,
like in ASP and ASP.NET, which needs to be interpreted, compiled and displayed.


I wonder if you could point me to a link or two that expounds on that
difference?

I ran three tests on each of three processors, with the following
results, for the C# code presented in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...lockTopic.asp:

The tests were:
1. The original code with just Page/Language directive prepended.
2. The original code with directive and comments.
3. The modified code with directive and comments.

The modification consisted mainly of pulling all the delimiters for the
closing script tag into the final line, augmented with a manual attempt
at pretty-printing, resulting in:

String scriptString = "";
scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</" + "script" + ">";

All tests ran fine for Web Matrix v. 0.6, with Help/About indicating
".NET Framework Version 1.0.3705.6018"

All tests had "Run" disabled but showed no errors for:
Visual Studio 2002, which reports ".NET Framework Version
1.0.3705"
Visual Web Developer, which reports ".NET Framework Version
2.0.507278"

This seems pretty weird to me. Do these results suggest anything new
to you?

Regards,
Richard

May 17 '06 #8
re:
I wonder if you could point me to a link or two that expounds on that difference?
Just think about why you need to register client script blocks in ASP.NET.

That very same link you posted :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp

has lots of information.

The same goes for RegisterStartupScript.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...asp?frame=true

For more details, check out Scott Mitchell's article
"Injecting Client-Side Script from an ASP.NET Server Control" :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...asp?frame=true


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@j55g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... Hi Juan,

I've played around a lot more with this and I'd appreciate knowing
whether the results provoke any additional thoughts.

Also, following up on your original suggestion:
You need to understand the difference between writing a Javascript block in a file
which will only be rendered and displayed, and writing a Javascript block in a file,
like in ASP and ASP.NET, which needs to be interpreted, compiled and displayed.


I wonder if you could point me to a link or two that expounds on that
difference?

I ran three tests on each of three processors, with the following
results, for the C# code presented in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...lockTopic.asp:

The tests were:
1. The original code with just Page/Language directive prepended.
2. The original code with directive and comments.
3. The modified code with directive and comments.

The modification consisted mainly of pulling all the delimiters for the
closing script tag into the final line, augmented with a manual attempt
at pretty-printing, resulting in:

String scriptString = "";
scriptString += "<script language=JavaScript> ";
scriptString += "function DoClick()";
scriptString += "{";
scriptString += " myForm.show.value='Msg from
Btn.DoClick()'";
scriptString += "}";
scriptString += "</" + "script" + ">";

All tests ran fine for Web Matrix v. 0.6, with Help/About indicating
".NET Framework Version 1.0.3705.6018"

All tests had "Run" disabled but showed no errors for:
Visual Studio 2002, which reports ".NET Framework Version
1.0.3705"
Visual Web Developer, which reports ".NET Framework Version
2.0.507278"

This seems pretty weird to me. Do these results suggest anything new
to you?

Regards,
Richard

May 17 '06 #9
Hi Juan,

Thanks for the links: I promise to study them assiduously to solve my
problem.

And thanks also for taking the time to respond to my repeated posts.
At the risk of "overstaying my welcome", can I prevail upon you to
consider the central issue of my earlier post today, namely, why is it
that the example I got from the
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
site runs on Web Matrix but not on Visual Studio .NET nor on Visual Web
Developer 2005 EE? Not suprisingly, my pretty-printed version had the
same experience.

Again, I promise to study the references closely to see if I can glean
and answer to that question myself.

Kindest regards,
Richard

May 17 '06 #10
re:
At the risk of "overstaying my welcome", can I prevail upon you to
consider the central issue of my earlier post today, namely, why is it
that the example I got from the
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
site runs on Web Matrix but not on Visual Studio .NET nor on Visual Web
Developer 2005 EE?
See it working, copied verbatim from the example at that page, at :

http://asp.net.do/test/RegisterClientScriptBlock.aspx


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@u72g2000cwu.googlegro ups.com... Hi Juan,

Thanks for the links: I promise to study them assiduously to solve my
problem.

And thanks also for taking the time to respond to my repeated posts.
At the risk of "overstaying my welcome", can I prevail upon you to
consider the central issue of my earlier post today, namely, why is it
that the example I got from the
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...BlockTopic.asp
site runs on Web Matrix but not on Visual Studio .NET nor on Visual Web
Developer 2005 EE? Not suprisingly, my pretty-printed version had the
same experience.

Again, I promise to study the references closely to see if I can glean
and answer to that question myself.

Kindest regards,
Richard

May 18 '06 #11
> See it working, copied verbatim from the example at that page, at :

http://asp.net.do/test/RegisterClientScriptBlock.aspx
Mucho Gracias, er, my Spanish may be a little weak, and no match for
your English :-)
Windows Server 2003 SP1 y Microsoft-IIS/6.0 usando ASP.NET 2.0.50727.42


I suspect THAT makes all the difference! I was running on WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1.

My server's been down for a while, but I hope to get it restored by
this weekend with the same configuration as yours. I have a strong
feeling everything I've done will work there (except for adding the
closing script tag as 'scriptString += "</script>";'). I'll let you
know.

Again, Jaun, thanks for taking all this time to help me with this
conundrum.

Best wishes,
Richard

May 18 '06 #12
It's been my pleasure, Richard.

Let us know what happens.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@j73g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
See it working, copied verbatim from the example at that page, at :

http://asp.net.do/test/RegisterClientScriptBlock.aspx


Mucho Gracias, er, my Spanish may be a little weak, and no match for
your English :-)
Windows Server 2003 SP1 y Microsoft-IIS/6.0 usando ASP.NET 2.0.50727.42


I suspect THAT makes all the difference! I was running on WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1.

My server's been down for a while, but I hope to get it restored by
this weekend with the same configuration as yours. I have a strong
feeling everything I've done will work there (except for adding the
closing script tag as 'scriptString += "</script>";'). I'll let you
know.

Again, Jaun, thanks for taking all this time to help me with this
conundrum.

Best wishes,
Richard

May 18 '06 #13
Hi Juan,

Well, I finally got Windows 2003 Server (Standard Ed.)/SP1 up and
running. I copied over my test versions of the example. All the ones
that failed with a couple of packages on my XP-Pro/SP2 workstation
worked fine when copied to the server and then accessed from my
workstation.

In particular, my favorite worked fine. It ending with:
scriptString += "</" + "script" + ">";

My most favorite failed, just as you suggested it would. It ending
with:
scriptString += "</script>";

So, I still contend that there are bugs in both VWD 2005 EE and VS.NET
or, most likely in IIS 5.1 because it uses .NET Framework 1.1 instead
of 2.0

But I concede that you are right about ending the script with:
scriptString += "<script>";
will fail even in presumably the best environment (IIS 6.0 and .NET
Framework 2.0).

But I'm still hung up on the idea that it should NOT fail. I wrote my
first program (on paper) in about 1955 after a friend in Princeton
graduate math dept. sent me a letter about this new (to us) wonderful
machine: a computer. After college and a year of graduate math at MIT,
I slowly swiched to a professional software developer, which I've been
for the last 40+ years.

So I think I have fair intuition about what ASP.NET does in translating
..aspx to .html, notwithstanding that I'm new to this particular
technology. And I can't imagine why that string has to processed
beyond creating intermediate code and generating the script text in the
html page until the browser processes the script, which should entail
only caching until the browser receives the button's click event.

But I guess I'll have to live with this situation until some future
day.

Best wishes,
Richard


Juan T. Llibre wrote:
It's been my pleasure, Richard.

Let us know what happens.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Richard" <Ri**********************@USComputerGurus.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@j73g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
See it working, copied verbatim from the example at that page, at :

http://asp.net.do/test/RegisterClientScriptBlock.aspx


Mucho Gracias, er, my Spanish may be a little weak, and no match for
your English :-)
Windows Server 2003 SP1 y Microsoft-IIS/6.0 usando ASP.NET 2.0.50727.42


I suspect THAT makes all the difference! I was running on WinXP/SP2
with IIS 5.1.

My server's been down for a while, but I hope to get it restored by
this weekend with the same configuration as yours. I have a strong
feeling everything I've done will work there (except for adding the
closing script tag as 'scriptString += "</script>";'). I'll let you
know.

Again, Jaun, thanks for taking all this time to help me with this
conundrum.

Best wishes,
Richard


May 21 '06 #14

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

9
by: Carsten Gehling | last post by:
Oh how often this subject may come up... The thing is, I've come to the decision of abandoning PHP as much as possible (old projects still remain...), and use Python for all purposes. Reason:...
2
by: Tomas Vera | last post by:
Hello All, I'm running into a problem that I don't know how to solve (properly, at least). Our web servers are running Win2K and have Framework v1.0.3705 running on them. We have a DLL...
1
by: Mike Hutton | last post by:
I need some help. I am trying to set up our development environment so as to make life easy for my fellow developers (none of whom have used ASP.NET or VS.NET before). We are developing our...
0
by: Kirt Loki Dankmyer | last post by:
So, I download the latest "stable" tar for perl (5.8.7) and try to compile it on the Solaris 8 (SPARC) box that I administrate. I try all sorts of different switches, but I can't get it to compile....
1
by: Ajay | last post by:
Can I build web projects from VS 2005 to target framework 1.1? If yes, is it possible to do this using aspnet_compiler so I can invoke it from msbuild scripts? Thanks.
2
by: Justin Naidl | last post by:
A group of friends and I are doing a RPG (role-playing game) maker for a school project. It occured to us, however, that if you want the user to be able to have almost complete control over the...
0
by: phoolimin | last post by:
Dear all, I am trying to embed python into another scripting language, to do this I need to solve a number of problems on importing or compiling python script. First let me state what exactly I...
1
by: Tomas Vera | last post by:
(This was posted in the Framework.Setup group a couple of days ago with no response. Hoping someone here has an idea on this.....) Hello, I'm unable to install (re-isntall) the 1.1 Framework. ...
5
by: jroozee | last post by:
I am developing in VS '03. I have all of the current framework versions installed on my PC, 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0. How can I make sure the code I am developing in is using the 3.0 framework version?...
2
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 7 Feb 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:30 (7.30PM). In this month's session, the creator of the excellent VBE...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
Hello Experts! I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
So, I have written a code for a cmd called "Send WhatsApp Message" to open and send WhatsApp messaage. The code is given below. Dim IE As Object Set IE =...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
by: marcoviolo | last post by:
Dear all, I would like to implement on my worksheet an vlookup dynamic , that consider a change of pivot excel via win32com, from an external excel (without open it) and save the new file into a...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.