473,503 Members | 9,057 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Excel interop from ASP.NET - Process can't be killed

Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution that
applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations on Excel
documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the
library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the
cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean up
fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but when
called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to the Win32
api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId. But
what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the process
ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET, the
process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering about..

I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik
Nov 18 '05 #1
10 3047
Hi,

try System.GC.Collect to cleanup all COM objects forcefully after you
finished off using them.

HTH
Regards
Joyjit

"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in
message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution that
applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations on Excel
documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the
library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the
cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean up fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but when
called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to the Win32 api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId. But what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the process ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET, the process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering about..

I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik

Nov 18 '05 #2
I did. Forgot to include it in the sample code.
Also tried GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers().

Still no cigar...

L-E

"Joyjit Mukherjee" <jo**************@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e6**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Hi,

try System.GC.Collect to cleanup all COM objects forcefully after you
finished off using them.

HTH
Regards
Joyjit

"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in
message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution that applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations on Excel
documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the
library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the
cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean

up
fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but when called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to the

Win32
api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId.

But
what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the

process
ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET,

the
process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering about..
I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik


Nov 18 '05 #3
microsoft does not recommend this approach:

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757

here is the workaround to do the exit

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in
message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution that
applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations on Excel
documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the
library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the
cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean up fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but when
called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to the Win32 api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId. But what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the process ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET, the process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering about..

I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik

Nov 18 '05 #4
I've tried all the workarounds. As you can see from my previous posts, the
..Net client releases excel when ran as a windows application or service.
Only when ran as ASP.NET Excel will stay around. Might be that I have to
create and release a reference to Worksheets too though, but I've allready
rewritten the code to use ADO for this problem. Anyway, thanks for the help
ppl - hope this issue will be resolved for office 2005 ;)

Lars-Erik
"bruce barker" <no***********@safeco.com> wrote in message
news:Os**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
microsoft does not recommend this approach:

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757

here is the workaround to do the exit

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in
message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution that applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations on Excel
documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the
library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the
cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean

up
fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but when called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to the

Win32
api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId.

But
what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the

process
ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET,

the
process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering about..
I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik


Nov 18 '05 #5
Ever get this to work?
Having the exact same issue.
Excel continues to run, even after releasing the coms, and when I try
and get the process ID I am rewarded with a 0.


Lars-Erik Aabech wrote:
I've tried all the workarounds. As you can see from my previous posts, the .Net client releases excel when ran as a windows application or service. Only when ran as ASP.NET Excel will stay around. Might be that I have to create and release a reference to Worksheets too though, but I've allready rewritten the code to use ADO for this problem. Anyway, thanks for the help ppl - hope this issue will be resolved for office 2005 ;)

Lars-Erik
"bruce barker" <no***********@safeco.com> wrote in message
news:Os**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
microsoft does not recommend this approach:

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757

here is the workaround to do the exit

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in
message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi!

This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution
that applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations
on Excel documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways
to clean up
fails.

The following code has been tried:

Application app = new ApplicationClass();
Workbook wb = null;

// some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close

// release workbook
ReleaseComObject(wb);
wb = null;

app.Quit();
ReleaseComObject(app);
app = null;

When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone,
but
when called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.

So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to
the Win32
api to find some functions. Et voila, we find
GetWindowThreadProcessId. But
what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app,
the process
ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from
ASP.NET, the
process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering

about..
I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...

Any help greatly appreciated......

Lars-Erik



Nov 19 '05 #6
Here is a code snippit of what I am trying to do. In general I am doing
the following.

1. creating an excel object
2. loading an xls file into the object
3. reading a value from the file and then updating a value in the file.
4. saving and closing the file.
5. quiting the excel object.
6. attempting to determine the Process ID of the hanging Excel object and
then terminate it. So far I only get a ProcessID of Zero, however.

***********************
Dim xExcel As New Excel.Application

Dim xBook As Object

Dim xBooks As Object

Dim xSheets As Object

Dim xSheet As Object

Dim xRange As Object

xBooks = xExcel.Workbooks

xBook = xBooks.Open(Filename:=strExcelFile, UpdateLinks:=False,
ReadOnly:=False)

Dim objPtr As New IntPtr

Dim intID As Integer = 0

Dim i As Integer = 0

objPtr = New System.IntPtr(xExcel.Hwnd)

i = GetWindowThreadProcessId(objPtr, intID)

If intID > 0 Then

Dim pExcel As New System.Diagnostics.Process

pExcel = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcessById(intID)

pExcel.Kill()

End If

Nov 19 '05 #7
Run....Run fast!

If you look at Microsoft's web site, they strongly discourage anyone from
using office applications from inside of asp.net. If there is any way
around it, then do it. One option would be to use Sql Reporting Services to
create a report and then export that report to an Excel file (file stream
you send back to the client).
"abillmeier" <ab********@ldmkusa.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
Ever get this to work?
Having the exact same issue.
Excel continues to run, even after releasing the coms, and when I try
and get the process ID I am rewarded with a 0.


Lars-Erik Aabech wrote:
I've tried all the workarounds. As you can see from my previous

posts, the
.Net client releases excel when ran as a windows application or

service.
Only when ran as ASP.NET Excel will stay around. Might be that I have

to
create and release a reference to Worksheets too though, but I've

allready
rewritten the code to use ADO for this problem. Anyway, thanks for

the help
ppl - hope this issue will be resolved for office 2005 ;)

Lars-Erik
"bruce barker" <no***********@safeco.com> wrote in message
news:Os**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
microsoft does not recommend this approach:

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757

here is the workaround to do the exit

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
"Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK> wrote in message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi!
>
> This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a solution
that
> applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations

on Excel > documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I use the > library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when the > cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways to clean up
> fails.
>
> The following code has been tried:
>
> Application app = new ApplicationClass();
> Workbook wb = null;
>
> // some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
> wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close
>
> // release workbook
> ReleaseComObject(wb);
> wb = null;
>
> app.Quit();
> ReleaseComObject(app);
> app = null;
>
> When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone, but
when
> called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.
>
> So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to

the Win32
> api to find some functions. Et voila, we find GetWindowThreadProcessId. But
> what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app, the process
> ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from ASP.NET, the
> process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering

about..
>
> I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...
>
> Any help greatly appreciated......
>
> Lars-Erik
>
>

Nov 19 '05 #8
Yeah. I know it is STRONGLY discouraged, but it is a request from above and
I need to find out if/how to do it regardless of the warnings.

In theory the code should work. I know it's not elegant.

The Excel part works great, except for leaving a hanging process. After
trying all of the MS reccomendations, I figured it might be best to just
identify the process ID of the hanger and then outright kill it. It is the
identification of the process ID that I am having a problem with at the
moment as it always comes back 0.

Any idea what is wrong?

Are there permissions retrictions that would stop the page from lookingup a
process id. Are there permission restrictions that will also stop me from
killing a process that was started by the page?


"David Jessee" <dj*****@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:%2******************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Run....Run fast!

If you look at Microsoft's web site, they strongly discourage anyone from
using office applications from inside of asp.net. If there is any way
around it, then do it. One option would be to use Sql Reporting Services
to
create a report and then export that report to an Excel file (file stream
you send back to the client).
"abillmeier" <ab********@ldmkusa.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
Ever get this to work?
Having the exact same issue.
Excel continues to run, even after releasing the coms, and when I try
and get the process ID I am rewarded with a 0.


Lars-Erik Aabech wrote:
> I've tried all the workarounds. As you can see from my previous

posts, the
> .Net client releases excel when ran as a windows application or

service.
> Only when ran as ASP.NET Excel will stay around. Might be that I have

to
> create and release a reference to Worksheets too though, but I've

allready
> rewritten the code to use ADO for this problem. Anyway, thanks for

the help
> ppl - hope this issue will be resolved for office 2005 ;)
>
> Lars-Erik
>
>
> "bruce barker" <no***********@safeco.com> wrote in message
> news:Os**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > microsoft does not recommend this approach:
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757
> >
> > here is the workaround to do the exit
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109
> >
> >
> >
> > -- bruce (sqlwork.com)
> >
> >
> > "Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK>

wrote in
> > message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a

solution
> that
> > > applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations

on Excel
> > > documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I

use the
> > > library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when

the
> > > cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways

to clean
> > up
> > > fails.
> > >
> > > The following code has been tried:
> > >
> > > Application app = new ApplicationClass();
> > > Workbook wb = null;
> > >
> > > // some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
> > > wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close
> > >
> > > // release workbook
> > > ReleaseComObject(wb);
> > > wb = null;
> > >
> > > app.Quit();
> > > ReleaseComObject(app);
> > > app = null;
> > >
> > > When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone,

but
> when
> > > called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.
> > >
> > > So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to

the
> > Win32
> > > api to find some functions. Et voila, we find

GetWindowThreadProcessId.
> > But
> > > what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app,

the
> > process
> > > ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from

ASP.NET,
> > the
> > > process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering
> about..
> > >
> > > I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...
> > >
> > > Any help greatly appreciated......
> > >
> > > Lars-Erik
> > >
> > >
> >
> >


Nov 19 '05 #9

"Johnny Fugazzi" <re*******************@ldmkusa.com> wrote in message
news:Oc**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

<snip>
objPtr = New System.IntPtr(xExcel.Hwnd)


The excel application is run from a non-interactive user acount in this
case, so it doesn't interact with the desktop and doesn't have a window.

Your best shot would be to use platform invoke to find and exit the
process - EnumProcesses (psapi.dll), OpenProcess (kernel32.dll),
GetModuleBaseName (psapi.dll), ExitProcess (kernel32.dll) and CloseHandle
(kernel32.dll).

Hope this helps
Martin Dechev
ASP.NET MVP
Nov 19 '05 #10
Then do 2 things.

First, research finding processes and how to kill them (you'll be looking
for Excel.exe...its case sensitive)

Secondly, tell the client that the solution will be unstable, as per
Microsoft's warnings unless they choose to invest in a 3rd party product
that can perform this functionality. You need to keep your posterior
covered because when the server locks up, they need to know that it was
their decision that made it happen.
"Johnny Fugazzi" <re*******************@ldmkusa.com> wrote in message
news:uy****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Yeah. I know it is STRONGLY discouraged, but it is a request from above and I need to find out if/how to do it regardless of the warnings.

In theory the code should work. I know it's not elegant.

The Excel part works great, except for leaving a hanging process. After
trying all of the MS reccomendations, I figured it might be best to just
identify the process ID of the hanger and then outright kill it. It is the identification of the process ID that I am having a problem with at the
moment as it always comes back 0.

Any idea what is wrong?

Are there permissions retrictions that would stop the page from lookingup a process id. Are there permission restrictions that will also stop me from
killing a process that was started by the page?


"David Jessee" <dj*****@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:%2******************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Run....Run fast!

If you look at Microsoft's web site, they strongly discourage anyone from using office applications from inside of asp.net. If there is any way
around it, then do it. One option would be to use Sql Reporting Services to
create a report and then export that report to an Excel file (file stream you send back to the client).
"abillmeier" <ab********@ldmkusa.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
Ever get this to work?
Having the exact same issue.
Excel continues to run, even after releasing the coms, and when I try
and get the process ID I am rewarded with a 0.


Lars-Erik Aabech wrote:
> I've tried all the workarounds. As you can see from my previous
posts, the
> .Net client releases excel when ran as a windows application or
service.
> Only when ran as ASP.NET Excel will stay around. Might be that I have
to
> create and release a reference to Worksheets too though, but I've
allready
> rewritten the code to use ADO for this problem. Anyway, thanks for
the help
> ppl - hope this issue will be resolved for office 2005 ;)
>
> Lars-Erik
>
>
> "bruce barker" <no***********@safeco.com> wrote in message
> news:Os**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > microsoft does not recommend this approach:
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;257757
> >
> > here is the workaround to do the exit
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;317109
> >
> >
> >
> > -- bruce (sqlwork.com)
> >
> >
> > "Lars-Erik Aabech" <la**************@markedspartner.noSPAMBLOCK>
wrote in
> > message news:OQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > This issue have been discussed a lot, but I haven't found a
solution
> that
> > > applies to ASP.NET. I have a library which does some operations
on Excel
> > > documents, and it will be used in an ASP.NET application. If I
use the
> > > library in a Forms application, the Excel process is removed when
the
> > > cleanup operations are done, but with ASP.NET all possible ways
to clean
> > up
> > > fails.
> > >
> > > The following code has been tried:
> > >
> > > Application app = new ApplicationClass();
> > > Workbook wb = null;
> > >
> > > // some code... no sheet reference done, only doing wb.load, x =
> > > wb.Worksheets.Count, wb.close
> > >
> > > // release workbook
> > > ReleaseComObject(wb);
> > > wb = null;
> > >
> > > app.Quit();
> > > ReleaseComObject(app);
> > > app = null;
> > >
> > > When the method is called from a windows app, Excel is now gone,
but
> when
> > > called from ASP.NET the Excel process remains.
> > >
> > > So we gathered that the process had to be killed manually. Off to
the
> > Win32
> > > api to find some functions. Et voila, we find
GetWindowThreadProcessId.
> > But
> > > what do you know? When the method is called from a windows app,
the
> > process
> > > ID is filled and we can kill the process, but when called from
ASP.NET,
> > the
> > > process ID is 0, the thread ID is 0, and Excel is still lingering
> about..
> > >
> > > I for one am ready to be committed to the local asylum...
> > >
> > > Any help greatly appreciated......
> > >
> > > Lars-Erik
> > >
> > >
> >
> >



Nov 19 '05 #11

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

5
13323
by: Josema | last post by:
Hi to all, I have a windows application that uses workbooks, sheets, ranges, etc... This application is consumed by few clients. Some weeks ago I had problems to kill excel.exe process but i...
1
1891
by: Micke | last post by:
I want to open Excel from an aspx page, put some records in there, format them and close the excel file. I can't open the Excel application. It says Cannot create ActiveX component. Here is the...
2
5423
by: Praveen K | last post by:
I have a problem in communicating between the C# and the Excel Interop objects. The problem is something as described below. I use Microsoft Office-XP PIA dll’s as these dll’s were been...
3
7415
by: Jennyfer Barco | last post by:
Hello, I have a question, how can I open Microsoft Excel from .NET. I only need to open a new file in Excel and paste some information and set the Microsoft Excel as the enabled aplication, so the...
0
2720
by: liam_jones | last post by:
I'm very new to Python, well IronPython to precise, and have been having problems when using Excel. The problem I'm having is the closing of my Excel object. I'm able to successfully quit the...
3
2202
by: KaNos | last post by:
Hello, I'm programming an C# application which uses Automation. The problem is when I quit the application a ghost of excel is always running (Can be seen in all processes with th task manager)....
2
2013
by: sfeinst | last post by:
I am trying to access Excel spreadsheets to modify data from a VB.NET application. If I have an object defined as: Public Class Test Private _excel As Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application...
13
2986
by: chuckie_9497 | last post by:
hello all you gurus. I am struggling with releasing com objects. I have isolated the problem to the code below. Objects are released and the process ends until I use "int k = sheet.Count;" Then...
7
2152
by: =?Utf-8?B?VGVycnkgSG9sbGFuZA==?= | last post by:
I have a vb.net app that opens an excel worksheet, reads data and then closes the sheet. Im noticing that the Excel process is still running after I have closed and disposed of my excel objects. ...
0
7193
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
7067
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
1
6975
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
7449
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
1
4992
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
0
4666
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
0
3160
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The...
0
3148
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
0
371
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.