I support several intranet sites one of which had NO STATE. Even though
content has ASP extensions, it was all rendered HTML. Site had NO session or
application variables being managed. Site had no global.asa. IIS Manager
had site timeout set to 20 minutes.
We had to add an ASP include to pages, and that ASP include contained our
first session variable. Users then started complaining of timeouts and being
redirected to logout pages because session variable evaporated. Users
requested a 4 hour - 240 minute timeout. This was set in IIS Manager on
site, and it didn't work. We added global.asa with timeout set in session
on_start routine, and even though we could display the timeout variable at
240 minutes, if we wait 30 minutes and pressed refresh on page displayed, it
took logic path indicating session variable no longer set.
Anyone know why we are experiencing this behavior? 13 2908
"doug" <dm*****@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:0A**********************************@microsof t.com...
I support several intranet sites one of which had NO STATE. Even though
content has ASP extensions, it was all rendered HTML. Site had NO session
or
application variables being managed. Site had no global.asa. IIS Manager
had site timeout set to 20 minutes.
We had to add an ASP include to pages, and that ASP include contained our
first session variable. Users then started complaining of timeouts and
being
redirected to logout pages because session variable evaporated. Users
requested a 4 hour - 240 minute timeout. This was set in IIS Manager on
site, and it didn't work. We added global.asa with timeout set in session
on_start routine, and even though we could display the timeout variable at
240 minutes, if we wait 30 minutes and pressed refresh on page displayed,
it
took logic path indicating session variable no longer set.
Anyone know why we are experiencing this behavior?
Most likely the application pool is recycling.
Take a look at the properties of the Application pool the site runs in. You
will probably need to adjust the recycling and preformance tabs so that the
workprocess is not recycled on a regular basis during normal use and that
the idle timeout is longer than the session timeout you require.
--
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET
Hi,
If this is a Windows 2003 IIS 6.0 server, please check the site's
application pool property. Verify the setting 'Shutdown worker processes
after being idle for(time in minutes)'.
The default setting of IIS6 is to shut down worker processes(web site/app
pool instances) if there is no new requests come in for 20 mins. In this
case, all the in-process sessions will be lost.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
That was it. Thanks. I have to say I'm not a big fan of overlapping options
of this nature.
doug
"Anthony Jones" wrote:
"doug" <dm*****@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:0A**********************************@microsof t.com...
I support several intranet sites one of which had NO STATE. Even though
content has ASP extensions, it was all rendered HTML. Site had NO session
or
application variables being managed. Site had no global.asa. IIS Manager
had site timeout set to 20 minutes.
We had to add an ASP include to pages, and that ASP include contained our
first session variable. Users then started complaining of timeouts and
being
redirected to logout pages because session variable evaporated. Users
requested a 4 hour - 240 minute timeout. This was set in IIS Manager on
site, and it didn't work. We added global.asa with timeout set in session
on_start routine, and even though we could display the timeout variable at
240 minutes, if we wait 30 minutes and pressed refresh on page displayed,
it
took logic path indicating session variable no longer set.
Anyone know why we are experiencing this behavior?
Most likely the application pool is recycling.
Take a look at the properties of the Application pool the site runs in. You
will probably need to adjust the recycling and preformance tabs so that the
workprocess is not recycled on a regular basis during normal use and that
the idle timeout is longer than the session timeout you require.
--
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET
This was it thanks.
doug
""WenJun Zhang[msft]"" wrote:
Hi,
If this is a Windows 2003 IIS 6.0 server, please check the site's
application pool property. Verify the setting 'Shutdown worker processes
after being idle for(time in minutes)'.
The default setting of IIS6 is to shut down worker processes(web site/app
pool instances) if there is no new requests come in for 20 mins. In this
case, all the in-process sessions will be lost.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
I'm not going to pretent I understand the nuances of this seeming overlapping
set of options. I'm in an applications group and we have moved to IIS6 as
part of a reband a year or so ago, and given tightened budgets in training,
our training went to more direct skill needs. Don't these various settings
in the app pool imply a depreciation of the site session timeout value? We
had hoped to control our production timeout issue from the application side
in that we can do an overnight content update via a new global.asa rather
than go thru a 10 day lead time to request/implement changes to a web site
from the server.
""WenJun Zhang[msft]"" wrote:
Hi,
If this is a Windows 2003 IIS 6.0 server, please check the site's
application pool property. Verify the setting 'Shutdown worker processes
after being idle for(time in minutes)'.
The default setting of IIS6 is to shut down worker processes(web site/app
pool instances) if there is no new requests come in for 20 mins. In this
case, all the in-process sessions will be lost.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"doug" <dm*****@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:8A**********************************@microsof t.com...
I'm not going to pretent I understand the nuances of this seeming
overlapping
set of options. I'm in an applications group and we have moved to IIS6 as
part of a reband a year or so ago, and given tightened budgets in
training,
our training went to more direct skill needs. Don't these various
settings
in the app pool imply a depreciation of the site session timeout value?
We
had hoped to control our production timeout issue from the application
side
in that we can do an overnight content update via a new global.asa rather
than go thru a 10 day lead time to request/implement changes to a web site
from the server.
A very active application pool would never shutdown due to an idle timeout.
However individual sessions associated with an application in the pool may
be abandoned due to inactivity from individual clients.
Application pool idle also applies more broadly than to just ASP to include
anything which requires handling by filters or other script engines. Which
is pretty much most things.
Also a single application pool can contain several distinct applications.
All applications in the pool would have to be idle for the timeout to take
effect. Each application may use its own ASP Session settings.
There is an overlap but more in an umbrella sort of way than in a
deprecating way.
You may have a pool with an 4 hour timeout and containing two ASP
applications one which also has a 4 hour timeout for its sessions and
another where 15 mins is more appropriate. It would be annoying if you
could only set the timeout on the application pool.
--
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET
That is one perspective. The other, ours, is our users made a good case for
needing a 4 hour session. By your thinking, we would need to adjust the app
pool timeouts to 4 hours (minimum) and then allow individual sites to tune
their respective timeout to values less than 4 hours. I'm not sure I
appreciate the umbrella nature provided if it means I need to effectively
nullify the umbrella by setting the value so high to accomodate users session
timeout needs.
But I will look into learning more about IIS6 and the features it offers.
Thanks for the insight.
"Anthony Jones" wrote:
"doug" <dm*****@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:8A**********************************@microsof t.com...
I'm not going to pretent I understand the nuances of this seeming
overlapping
set of options. I'm in an applications group and we have moved to IIS6 as
part of a reband a year or so ago, and given tightened budgets in
training,
our training went to more direct skill needs. Don't these various
settings
in the app pool imply a depreciation of the site session timeout value?
We
had hoped to control our production timeout issue from the application
side
in that we can do an overnight content update via a new global.asa rather
than go thru a 10 day lead time to request/implement changes to a web site
from the server.
A very active application pool would never shutdown due to an idle timeout.
However individual sessions associated with an application in the pool may
be abandoned due to inactivity from individual clients.
Application pool idle also applies more broadly than to just ASP to include
anything which requires handling by filters or other script engines. Which
is pretty much most things.
Also a single application pool can contain several distinct applications.
All applications in the pool would have to be idle for the timeout to take
effect. Each application may use its own ASP Session settings.
There is an overlap but more in an umbrella sort of way than in a
deprecating way.
You may have a pool with an 4 hour timeout and containing two ASP
applications one which also has a 4 hour timeout for its sessions and
another where 15 mins is more appropriate. It would be annoying if you
could only set the timeout on the application pool.
--
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET
doug wrote:
That is one perspective. The other, ours, is our users made a good
case for needing a 4 hour session.
Actually, it sounds to me as if they've made a strong case for storing state
in a database rather than in Session.
--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"
You couldn't be more wrong. Until this requirement change to use this one
single session variable, the server was "stateless". All content rendered
and reposted nightly. No external connections allowed, no databases on
server used. And until then, because sessions didn't appear to die, at least
no symptoms, users had never experienced a timeout. And after long, quick
discussions they decided on 240 minute (4 hour) timeout.
All the other sites supported that have dynamic content seem to have
timeouts set to 20 minutes or less so we hadn't seen it. This sight, by the
nature of it, is just used a different way.
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" wrote:
doug wrote:
That is one perspective. The other, ours, is our users made a good
case for needing a 4 hour session.
Actually, it sounds to me as if they've made a strong case for storing state
in a database rather than in Session.
--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"
You're missing my point, but I'm not going to argue with you.
doug wrote:
You couldn't be more wrong. Until this requirement change to use
this one single session variable, the server was "stateless". All
content rendered and reposted nightly. No external connections
allowed, no databases on server used. And until then, because
sessions didn't appear to die, at least no symptoms, users had never
experienced a timeout. And after long, quick discussions they
decided on 240 minute (4 hour) timeout.
All the other sites supported that have dynamic content seem to have
timeouts set to 20 minutes or less so we hadn't seen it. This sight,
by the nature of it, is just used a different way.
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" wrote:
>doug wrote:
>>That is one perspective. The other, ours, is our users made a good case for needing a 4 hour session.
Actually, it sounds to me as if they've made a strong case for storing state in a database rather than in Session. -- Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the "NO SPAM"
--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"
There is no justification for a 4 hour timeout.
If folks need to keep their session alive for one stinking session variable, then have that page auto refresh or store that one
value in a cookie.
"doug" <dm*****@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message news:BC**********************************@microsof t.com...
You couldn't be more wrong. Until this requirement change to use this one
single session variable, the server was "stateless". All content rendered
and reposted nightly. No external connections allowed, no databases on
server used. And until then, because sessions didn't appear to die, at least
no symptoms, users had never experienced a timeout. And after long, quick
discussions they decided on 240 minute (4 hour) timeout.
All the other sites supported that have dynamic content seem to have
timeouts set to 20 minutes or less so we hadn't seen it. This sight, by the
nature of it, is just used a different way.
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" wrote:
>doug wrote:
That is one perspective. The other, ours, is our users made a good
case for needing a 4 hour session.
Actually, it sounds to me as if they've made a strong case for storing state in a database rather than in Session. -- Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the "NO SPAM"
Hi,
For a busy production site, generally the application pool idle shutdown
setting will not affect session state since there are always new requests
come in and *ping* the worker process.
Actually the idle auto shutting down function is very important on server
health because application pool can have multiple worker process instance
in IIS 6.0 worker process mode. Based on these new health/recycling
features of application pool, sometime web applications with small
flaws(e.g occasional memory leak, deadlock, etc) can still *work* on IIS6
but will fail on IIS 5.x or eariler.
In this specific case, I'd suggest you adjust the idle shutdown time to a
value greater than 4 hours instead of disabling it.
Please let me know if you have more concern on this.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Just want to check if you have any further question or concern on this?
Have a great day.
Sincerely,
WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Carpe Diem |
last post by:
Hello I have an aspx page that loses Session("user") value after a few
minutes even after I set
<sessionState mode="InProc" cookieless="false" timeout="300"> in web.config
and wrote
function...
|
by: Samuel Stanojevic |
last post by:
- I'm using .NET Framework 1.1.
I just noticed that whenever I change the value of Session.Timeout (no
matter which aspx page this happens on), at the end of the request,
the 'Session_End'...
|
by: Nick |
last post by:
Hi
I am a little stuck. I have a web app which uses cookieless session
management. I would like to inform a user when their session has
ended but cannot work out how to implement. I thought...
|
by: Joe Abou Jaoude |
last post by:
hi,
I have a web app with forms authentication and a timeout session of 20
mins for security reasons. I recently added a feature that allows users
(if they want to) to automatically log in...
|
by: davvel |
last post by:
It has been 6 days of re-writing the same code in different ways to try
and avoid a getResponse Timeout which haunted me for much too long now.
I am trying to do a very simple thing which is...
|
by: Craig |
last post by:
I'm using FormsAuthentication. If the session restarts, obviously the
session variables are cleared, but the security ticket is still active.
Since I use variables in the Session to determine what...
|
by: Ed |
last post by:
I have some questions in regards to Session variables and IIS Recycling:
1. Does the IIS setting 'Shutdown worker process after being idle' affect
an
application's session variables?
Or is IIS...
|
by: metsie |
last post by:
Hi all,
How can I set the session TimeOut from inside the Code? Also is there a
way to make the session variables Expires after a number of minutes of
inactivity. i.e. I want to make the session...
|
by: Nathan Sokalski |
last post by:
I have a page that uses Session variables when generating the SQL statements
used to submit and retrieve data from a database. However, because I don't
know how long the user will be on the page,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 4 Oct 2023 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM)
The start time is equivalent to 19:00 (7PM) in Central...
|
by: Aliciasmith |
last post by:
In an age dominated by smartphones, having a mobile app for your business is no longer an option; it's a necessity. Whether you're a startup or an established enterprise, finding the right mobile app...
|
by: NeoPa |
last post by:
Hello everyone.
I find myself stuck trying to find the VBA way to get Access to create a PDF of the currently-selected (and open) object (Form or Report).
I know it can be done by selecting :...
|
by: NeoPa |
last post by:
Introduction
For this article I'll be using a very simple database which has Form (clsForm) & Report (clsReport) classes that simply handle making the calling Form invisible until the Form, or all...
|
by: Teri B |
last post by:
Hi, I have created a sub-form Roles. In my course form the user selects the roles assigned to the course.
0ne-to-many. One course many roles.
Then I created a report based on the Course form and...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 1 Nov 2023 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM)
Please note that the UK and Europe revert to winter time on...
|
by: NeoPa |
last post by:
Introduction
For this article I'll be focusing on the Report (clsReport) class. This simply handles making the calling Form invisible until all of the Reports opened by it have been closed, when it...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next online meeting of the Access Europe User Group will be on Wednesday 6 Dec 2023 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, Mike...
|
by: GKJR |
last post by:
Does anyone have a recommendation to build a standalone application to replace an Access database? I have my bookkeeping software I developed in Access that I would like to make available to other...
| |