Wayne, see:
Converting from Access 97
at:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~allenbrowne/ser-48.html
Particularly, the Usability part of the article highlights the issues you
must be aware of to get A2000 and later working reliably.
IME and subject to the limitations discussed in the article, A2003 is the
most reliable version of Access for developing in.
--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users -
http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.
"Wayne Aprato" <cq*******@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:4d*************************@posting.google.co m...
How does Access 2002 fit in to the reliability lineup of Access
versions. Access 95 seemed to be fairly ordinary, Access 97 by all
accounts was their best effort yet and Access 2000 seems to have a few
nasty bugs.
Any opinions/help would be appreciated.