Hi,
I have found some code on the Microsoft knowledge base that 'should' allow
me to send emails and attachments
However the code tries to use Outlook and i want it to use outlook Express
the line that selects outlook is
Set objOutlook = CreateObject("Outlook.Application")
What do i use instead of Outlook.Application to get it to use Outlook
Express instead?
Thanks
Dave 30 1881
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@sparta.btinternet.com: What do i use instead of Outlook.Application to get it to use Outlook Express instead?
You can find some code to send e-mail through Outlook Express in the
downloads section of the site designated in my signature line.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
How do i find the downloads section?
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@sparta.btinternet.com:
What do i use instead of Outlook.Application to get it to use Outlook Express instead?
You can find some code to send e-mail through Outlook Express in the downloads section of the site designated in my signature line.
-- Lyle (for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@titan.btinternet.com: How do i find the downloads section?
You could click on
Home
or perhaps
Portfolio
or Contacts
or maybe
Donwloads?
Let me check ... yeppers ... "Downloads" works for me.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@titan.btinternet.com:
How do i find the downloads section?
You could click on
Home
or perhaps
Portfolio
or Contacts
or maybe
Donwloads?
Let me check ... yeppers ... "Downloads" works for me.
-- Lyle (for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older
browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested
as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might
account for their being invisible.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
On 2 Jun 2004 20:04:03 GMT, Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote: "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
I have never had a problem viewing your site using IE 6, however today -
Problems with this web page might prevent it from being displayed properly or functioning properly.
Line: 91
Char: 1
Error: Syntax Error
Code:0
URL: http://ffdba.com/heading.htm
I get your FFDBA logo and nothing else.
Wayne Gillespie
Gosford NSW Australia
Wayne Gillespie <be*****@NObestfitsoftwareSPAM.com.au> wrote in
news:6p********************************@4ax.com: On 2 Jun 2004 20:04:03 GMT, Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
I have never had a problem viewing your site using IE 6, however today -
Problems with this web page might prevent it from being displayed properly or functioning properly. Line: 91 Char: 1 Error: Syntax Error Code:0 URL: http://ffdba.com/heading.htm
I get your FFDBA logo and nothing else.
Wayne Gillespie Gosford NSW Australia
good news ... not!
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Wayne Gillespie <be*****@NObestfitsoftwareSPAM.com.au> wrote in news:6p********************************@4ax.com:
On 2 Jun 2004 20:04:03 GMT, Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
I have never had a problem viewing your site using IE 6, however today -
Problems with this web page might prevent it from being displayed properly or functioning properly. Line: 91 Char: 1 Error: Syntax Error Code:0 URL: http://ffdba.com/heading.htm
I get your FFDBA logo and nothing else.
Wayne Gillespie Gosford NSW Australia
good news ... not!
-- Lyle (for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
Lyle,
I see the same as Wayne.
Were are both in Australia, so maybe the rest of the page fell off the
bottom of the world before it could render...? "8-P
Doug
--
Remove the blots from my address to reply
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is
bloody stupid web page design.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
"Doug Hutcheson" <do*****************@nrm.blot.qld.blot.gov.blot.au >
wrote in news:Mv***************@news.optus.net.au: I see the same as Wayne. Were are both in Australia, so maybe the rest of the page fell off the bottom of the world before it could render...?
I see the same problems as well, but I use a proxy that filters out
Javascript. If I turn that off, I get the same problem -- nothing
but the logo.
Using Javascript for things that can be done without scripting is
shooting yourself in the foot.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in
news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design.
I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good
presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Bob Quintal
Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in
news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com: "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Oh!
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in
news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com: "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook
Express code in some site with more content.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
On 3 Jun 2004 01:35:43 GMT, Lyle Fairfield
<Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote:
Hear, hear.
-Tom.
<clip> I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
"Bob Quintal" <bq******@generation.net> wrote in message
news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com... "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Bob Quintal
Aren't we special.
I for one would like to see you content but dispite having Java enabled
still cannot see you link
could you please post the url of your download page so i can get to it,
thanks
Dave
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on > http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their
Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
-- Lyle (for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
All of you go to your rooms, and DONT come out until you can act like polite
children !
Rob.
PS. Lyle - site worked fine for me...thanks for the code
"rkc" <rk*@yabba.dabba.do.rochester.rr.bomb> wrote in message
news:b4*******************@twister.nyroc.rr.com... "Bob Quintal" <bq******@generation.net> wrote in message news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com... "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Bob Quintal
Aren't we special.
Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in
news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com: "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design.
I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Actually, I would disagree.
Javascript has several useful functions to do things client-side
that can't be done in any other way:
1. pop-up windows -- I'm not against requested pop-ups. The perfect
use of pop-ups is on Dell's site, where they use them for the "more
information" links.
2. form validation -- since I believe that you should validate data
as it's entered, it's better to do this client-side, rather than
sending a complete form's data back to the server for validation.
There are other uses.
But populating the user interface is not one of them. Using
Javascript for that is as bad as the increasing practice of using
Flash for navigation.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
I'm not surprised that you'd take numerous reports of inability to
view your site as evidence of something wrong with the people
visiting it, rather than as proof that your site is poorly designed.
Of course, I have no interest in Outlook Express code, as I think
it's malpractice for any programmer or consultant to recommend to a
client that Outlook Express be used for anything at all.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: I for one would like to see you content but dispite having Java enabled still cannot see you link
could you please post the url of your download page so i can get to it,
thanks
Dave
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
> "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in > news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: > >> Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in >> news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: >> >>> "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: >>> >>>> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on >>>> http://ffdba.com/ >>> >>> I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility >>> that some older browser or some cached page may not show the >>> links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated >>> through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for >>> their being invisible. >> >> Using Javascript to do things that can be done without >> scripting is bloody stupid web page design. >> > I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good > presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content. http://ffdba.com/downloads/Send_Mail...ok_Express.dat
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
I for one would like to see you content but dispite having Java enabled still cannot see you link
could you please post the url of your download page so i can get to it,
thanks
Dave
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
> "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in > news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: > >> Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in >> news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: >> >>> "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: >>> >>>> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on >>>> http://ffdba.com/ >>> >>> I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility >>> that some older browser or some cached page may not show the >>> links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated >>> through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for >>> their being invisible. >> >> Using Javascript to do things that can be done without >> scripting is bloody stupid web page design. >> > I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good > presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
http://ffdba.com/downloads/Send_Mail...ok_Express.dat
Due to popular demand we removed the javascript today. Be sure to clear
your cache if you are going to look. But damn!, removing the javascript
didn't increase the amount of the content, nor its quality.
Error reports will be great and fully received!
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in
news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: I for one would like to see you content but dispite having Java enabled still cannot see you link
could you please post the url of your download page so i can get to it,
thanks
Dave
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
> "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in > news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: > >> Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in >> news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: >> >>> "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: >>> >>>> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on >>>> http://ffdba.com/ >>> >>> I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility >>> that some older browser or some cached page may not show the >>> links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated >>> through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for >>> their being invisible. >> >> Using Javascript to do things that can be done without >> scripting is bloody stupid web page design. >> > I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good > presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
http://ffdba.com/downloads/Send_Mail...ok_Express.dat
Due to popular demand we removed the javascript today. Be sure to clear your cache if you are going to look. But damn!, removing the javascript didn't increase the amount of the content, nor its quality. Error reports will be great and fully received!
-- Lyle (for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
Lyle,
It sure added to the content from my perspective, now that I can see it....
<grin>
Doug
--
Remove the blots from my address to reply
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in
news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: I for one would like to see you content but dispite having Java enabled still cannot see you link
could you please post the url of your download page so i can get to it,
thanks
Dave
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
> "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in > news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74: > >> Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in >> news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4: >> >>> "Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com: >>> >>>> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on >>>> http://ffdba.com/ >>> >>> I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility >>> that some older browser or some cached page may not show the >>> links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated >>> through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for >>> their being invisible. >> >> Using Javascript to do things that can be done without >> scripting is bloody stupid web page design. >> > I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good > presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
I suppose those who have javascript disabled will have to get their Outlook Express code in some site with more content.
http://ffdba.com/downloads/Send_Mail...ok_Express.dat
Due to popular demand we removed the javascript today. Be sure to clear your cache if you are going to look. But damn!, removing the javascript didn't increase the amount of the content, nor its quality. Error reports will be great and fully received!
I liked it better the other way, but the vocal minority seems to rule these
days.
Your associates have disappeared.
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in
news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.86: Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design. I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Actually, I would disagree.
Javascript has several useful functions to do things client-side that can't be done in any other way:
You are absolutely correct in saying that javascript has uses.
That takes nothing away from my comment. I see an awful lot of
awful javascript doing awfully useless things. I use Opera as my
primary browser, and if I have it report JS errors, I can't go
more than three or four sites before getting a slew of errors. 1. pop-up windows -- I'm not against requested pop-ups. The perfect use of pop-ups is on Dell's site, where they use them for the "more information" links.
Requested popups good. Spam popups bad. And 9 out of every 10
popups I see are not requested.
2. form validation -- since I believe that you should validate data as it's entered, it's better to do this client-side, rather than sending a complete form's data back to the server for validation.
I'll buy this reason. There are other uses.
But populating the user interface is not one of them. Using Javascript for that is as bad as the increasing practice of using Flash for navigation.
Bob Quintal
Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in
news:5c******************************@news.teranew s.com: "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.86:
Bob Quintal <bq******@generation.net> wrote in news:c8******************************@news.teranew s.com:
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74:
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design.
I fully agree. Most use of javascript is to make a good presentation, as compensation for a lack of content.
Actually, I would disagree.
Javascript has several useful functions to do things client-side that can't be done in any other way:
You are absolutely correct in saying that javascript has uses. That takes nothing away from my comment. I see an awful lot of awful javascript doing awfully useless things. I use Opera as my primary browser, and if I have it report JS errors, I can't go more than three or four sites before getting a slew of errors. 1. pop-up windows -- I'm not against requested pop-ups. The perfect use of pop-ups is on Dell's site, where they use them for the "more information" links.
Requested popups good. Spam popups bad. And 9 out of every 10 popups I see are not requested.
2. form validation -- since I believe that you should validate data as it's entered, it's better to do this client-side, rather than sending a complete form's data back to the server for validation.
I'll buy this reason. There are other uses.
But populating the user interface is not one of them. Using Javascript for that is as bad as the increasing practice of using Flash for navigation.
Perhaps you and David could post the urls of those really great sites you
have created?
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"rkc" <rk*@yabba.dabba.do.rochester.rr.bomb> wrote in news:3cOvc.119140
$h*******@twister.nyroc.rr.com: I liked it better the other way, but the vocal minority seems to rule these days.
In response to your comment I changed portfolio and downloads so they show
in-page.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74... Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design.
-- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
Looking at the JScript behind the pages:
<script language=javascript>
<!--
if(navigator.appName=='Microsoft Internet Explorer'){
<snip FLASH code here>
}
else{
document.writeln('<img src=images/ffdba.png>');
}
The people who are seeing a problem probably have a navigator.AppName that
is not "Microsoft Internet Explorer" and are just seeing that .PNG file
(which is all I can see, and I am running the absolute latest version of
IE).
--
MichKa [MS]
NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
This posting is provided "AS IS" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Austin Griswold" <AG*******@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:#1**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote in message news:Xn**********************************@24.168.1 28.74... Lyle Fairfield <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4:
"Dave" <e@mail.co.uk> wrote in news:c9**********@hercules.btinternet.com:
> Sarcasm is great, but there are no links on http://ffdba.com/
I test on IE and Mozilla. I suppose there's a possibility that some older browser or some cached page may not show the links. The links are manifested as images are instantiated through Javascript. One of those conditions might account for their being invisible.
Using Javascript to do things that can be done without scripting is bloody stupid web page design.
-- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
"Lyle Fairfield" <Mi************@Invalid.Com> wrote in message
news:Xn*******************@130.133.1.4... "rkc" <rk*@yabba.dabba.do.rochester.rr.bomb> wrote in news:3cOvc.119140 $h*******@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
I liked it better the other way, but the vocal minority seems to rule
these days.
In response to your comment I changed portfolio and downloads so they show in-page.
My memory isn't what it used to be, but I believe what ever you were doing
before to show the information section in-page was viewable in 800x600.
Now it's necessary to scroll right to see the vertical scroll bar.
Chuck Grimsby <c.*******@worldnet.att.net.invalid> wrote in
news:5e********************************@4ax.com: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:20:37 GMT, "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote:
Javascript has several useful functions to do things client-side that can't be done in any other way: 1. pop-up windows -- I'm not against requested pop-ups. The perfect use of pop-ups is on Dell's site, where they use them for the "more information" links. Pop-up windows where users have to click on something to open the window does not require javascript. Plain old HTML is all that's needed.
Can you control the style of the window with windows opened in that
fashion? That is, sizing the window, removing the browser toolbar
and menu, and so forth?
See http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/special/a.html for more information, most notably the "TARGET" portion of the tag.
There's nothing mentioned here or in the W3C's documentation
( http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html) about styling
the window with TARGET.
Indeed, it appears from the W3C docmentation that the chief purpose
of TARGET is for use with frames, where window characteristics are
predefined, since the frame is a child window.
Indeed, it appears that the behavior of TARGET is under discussion: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-hyperlinks-20040224/
But even there, I see no discussion of positioning or sizing or
removal of browser chrome/toolbars, etc.
Another point is that even if TARGET were to allow the specification
of such attributes, it would not really allow the same kind of
centralization of code that Javascript allows. A single piece of
code could be used to launch all popups, whereas with the TARGET
attribute, you'd have to specify all the other attributes inline,
with each link. Well, I guess you could use CSS for that, but it's
not clear to me that CSS can control all of the attributes that
Javascript can control.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Brendan MAther |
last post by:
I have a table called Contact_Info. I have a form that allows me to show
all the contacts from a specified city and sector. Once these contacts
appear on my new form I would like to be able to...
|
by: Chuck |
last post by:
I have a database that has a table in it with employee information (name,
dob, email, etc). This is joined to a table that has tasks that are
assigned to each individual that has a recurring date....
|
by: Colin Anderson |
last post by:
I discovered, with great excitement, this article
http://www.davison.uk.net/vb2notes.asp when researching methods for
emailing from Access via Notes. Unfortunatly, when I run this I get a...
|
by: Andrew Wrigley |
last post by:
Hi
I am setting up emailing for an all Access contact management app and
DO NOT want to use Outlook.
Aspemail.dll (aspemail.com) works fine, but...
Unless you pay the licence fee for the...
|
by: Strasser |
last post by:
In Access2000 mass emailing worked perfectly (very powerful tool!).
Doesn't work when using XP version of both Access and Outlook, even
though I checked the box to ensure that I was sending the...
|
by: Wayne |
last post by:
I am experiencing an intermittent problem when emailing snapshot
reports using Sendobject. Outlook opens with the snapshot of the
report attached but when I click the "Send" button on the Outlook...
|
by: Farooq Khan |
last post by:
hi,
i'm using CDONTS component for emailing through one of my web service like
this
// Start of code
// 'email' is the CDONTS object name
email.send(EmailFrom.ToString(), EmailTo.ToString(),...
|
by: Tim Hunter |
last post by:
I have two questions regarding emailing from Access.
My first question relates to how many email addresses is too much. I
have a client who wants to email 1500 people at once. Is this possible
or...
|
by: szag via AccessMonster.com |
last post by:
First - I don't know VBA very well at all.
I have report that I want to email to multiple users that give them the
quantities of their Inventory parts only. So I need something that will loop...
|
by: marjbell |
last post by:
I have a Access database of email addresses that I would like to mass
email to customers. Can Access be used through Outlook? or can it just
be done with Access? I know it is possible to use...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |