Sorry, I'm lying, the images were in the same folder as the page I was
calling.
I've now put copies of those images into the same folder as the page I'm
calling from and that seems to have fixed it.
Strange though that it wouldn't work with the images left as they are.
Cheers.
"Miguel Orrego" <mi****@stressedmonkey.net-nospam> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@news.dial.pipex.com ...
Great, that seems to have acheived what I want, but only halfway.
When calling a file that has images, the images don't show, just get the
usual box with a cross as you would get when the image file is not found.
The images are there, but the path to them from the called document would
be ../images/image1.jpg etc. Would this have an impact? Should the images be
in the same folder as the called document? Is there a way around this?
Cheers.
"Evertjan." <ex**************@interxnl.net> wrote in message
news:Xn********************@194.109.133.29... Miguel Orrego wrote on 15 jul 2003 in
microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general: "Evertjan." <ex**************@interxnl.net> wrote in message
news:Xn********************@194.109.133.29...
> Miguel Orrego wrote on 15 jul 2003 in
> microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
> > Is there any way of having an include file as a string, eg:
> >
> > <!--#include file="<%=strURL%>"-->
> >
>
> No, the include is executed before the asp-parsing,
> so that asp contents of the include get parsed too.
>
> Try server.execute
Thanks, could you show me some example code using server.execute ?
<%
myurl = "/myfile.asp"
server.execute myurl
%>
not tested
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
