How would you translate this?

[=?Utf-8?B?Qi4gQ2hlcm5pY2s=?=]

I've just been tasked to translate a C# project into VB (Dot Net 2.0). I am
somewhat familiar with C# but far from an expert.

I'd like a second opinion on this one.

The project uses CSLA 2.1.4. The project has a class that inherits from
ReadOnlyBase. ReadOnlyBase has a method declaration:
protected virtual void DataPortal_Fetch(object criteria)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(Resources.FetchNotSupportedE xception);
}

The child class has a declaration:
private void DataPortal_Fetch(Criteria criteria)
where Criteria is a local private class.

(I am aware that this declaration is taking advantage of C#'s case
sensitivity. VS appears to have no problem with this declaration.)

In the VB version of CSLA, the declaration is:
Protected Overridable Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria As Object)
Throw New NotSupportedException(My.Resources.FetchNotSupport edException)
End Sub

What I am uncertain of is how to translate the declaration of the inheriting
class DataPortan_Fetch declaration.

If I try to do a direct translation, taking into account lack of case
sensitivity:

Private Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Criteria)

I get a warning: sub 'DataPortal_Fetch' shadows an overridable method in the
base class 'ReadOnlyBase'. To override the base method, this method must be
declared 'Overrides'.

The alternative, which eliminates the warning would appear to be:
Protected Overrides Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Object)
I would then do a ctype within the sub when it becomes necessary to access
the properties of the class Criteria.

Which would be the more accurate method?

[Bill McCarthy]

Hi,

Try:
Private Overloads Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria As Criteria)


"B. Chernick" <BC*******@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:23**********************************@microsof t.com...

I've just been tasked to translate a C# project into VB (Dot Net 2.0). I
am
somewhat familiar with C# but far from an expert.

I'd like a second opinion on this one.

The project uses CSLA 2.1.4. The project has a class that inherits from
ReadOnlyBase. ReadOnlyBase has a method declaration:
protected virtual void DataPortal_Fetch(object criteria)
{
throw new
NotSupportedException(Resources.FetchNotSupportedE xception);
}

The child class has a declaration:
private void DataPortal_Fetch(Criteria criteria)
where Criteria is a local private class.

(I am aware that this declaration is taking advantage of C#'s case
sensitivity. VS appears to have no problem with this declaration.)

In the VB version of CSLA, the declaration is:
Protected Overridable Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria As Object)
Throw New
NotSupportedException(My.Resources.FetchNotSupport edException)
End Sub

What I am uncertain of is how to translate the declaration of the
inheriting
class DataPortan_Fetch declaration.

If I try to do a direct translation, taking into account lack of case
sensitivity:

Private Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Criteria)

I get a warning: sub 'DataPortal_Fetch' shadows an overridable method in
the
base class 'ReadOnlyBase'. To override the base method, this method must
be
declared 'Overrides'.

The alternative, which eliminates the warning would appear to be:
Protected Overrides Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Object)
I would then do a ctype within the sub when it becomes necessary to access
the properties of the class Criteria.

Which would be the more accurate method?

[=?Utf-8?B?Qi4gQ2hlcm5pY2s=?=]

It does eliminate the warning. Thanks!

(Of course I'm still trying to understand the original intent of the C# code.)

"Bill McCarthy" wrote:

Hi,

Try:
Private Overloads Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria As Criteria)


"B. Chernick" <BC*******@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:23**********************************@microsof t.com...

I've just been tasked to translate a C# project into VB (Dot Net 2.0). I
am
somewhat familiar with C# but far from an expert.

I'd like a second opinion on this one.

The project uses CSLA 2.1.4. The project has a class that inherits from
ReadOnlyBase. ReadOnlyBase has a method declaration:
protected virtual void DataPortal_Fetch(object criteria)
{
throw new
NotSupportedException(Resources.FetchNotSupportedE xception);
}

The child class has a declaration:
private void DataPortal_Fetch(Criteria criteria)
where Criteria is a local private class.

(I am aware that this declaration is taking advantage of C#'s case
sensitivity. VS appears to have no problem with this declaration.)

In the VB version of CSLA, the declaration is:
Protected Overridable Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria As Object)
Throw New
NotSupportedException(My.Resources.FetchNotSupport edException)
End Sub

What I am uncertain of is how to translate the declaration of the
inheriting
class DataPortan_Fetch declaration.

If I try to do a direct translation, taking into account lack of case
sensitivity:

Private Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Criteria)

I get a warning: sub 'DataPortal_Fetch' shadows an overridable method in
the
base class 'ReadOnlyBase'. To override the base method, this method must
be
declared 'Overrides'.

The alternative, which eliminates the warning would appear to be:
Protected Overrides Sub DataPortal_Fetch(ByVal criteria1 As Object)
I would then do a ctype within the sub when it becomes necessary to access
the properties of the class Criteria.

Which would be the more accurate method?

[=?UTF-8?B?R8O2cmFuIEFuZGVyc3Nvbg==?=]

B. Chernick wrote:

It does eliminate the warning. Thanks!

(Of course I'm still trying to understand the original intent of the C# code.)

That's the intent of the original code. You simply don't have to specify
with a keyword that you are overloading a method in C#.

--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com