Hi,
I have a basic app that I have build and am trying to use the click
once/publish feature to make the installation.
I have create a Virtual Machine using XP SP2, install VS.2005(aka dev) and
created the project.
I have a second Virtual Machine also with XP SP2(aka Clean), nothing else
installed.
When I use the Clean machine to run the installation it first wants to to
install dotNet framework 3.5
I don't want to have the user having to install 62mb of .net 3.5 framework
when the application is build for 2.0
I have checked the setting for the publish now function, and the only
Prerequisite is .net framework 2.0
Even when I unclick this (to test) the application installation still wants
to install .net 3.5 framework.
What is going on!!!
I want to have XP Sp2 users using my applicaton, so since they already have
2.0 then I don't have to install anything but my little application
4  1384 
On May 8, 10:39 am, "Aussie Rules" <aus...@nospam.comwrote:
Hi,
I have a basic app that I have build and am trying to use the click
once/publish feature to make the installation.
I have create a Virtual Machine using XP SP2, install VS.2005(aka dev) and
created the project.
I have a second Virtual Machine also with XP SP2(aka Clean), nothing else
installed.
When I use the Clean machine to run the installation it first wants to to
install dotNet framework 3.5
I don't want to have the user having to install 62mb of .net 3.5 framework
when the application is build for 2.0
I have checked the setting for the publish now function, and the only
Prerequisite is .net framework 2.0
Even when I unclick this (to test) the application installation still wants
to install .net 3.5 framework.
What is going on!!!
I want to have XP Sp2 users using my applicaton, so since they already have
2.0 then I don't have to install anything but my little application
Hi Aussie,
Just a guess, if you have used VS 2008 for a while then the target
framework may have been set to 3.5,then 2.0 clients may have forced to
use 3.5.
Onur
Hi Kimi... (your off to a good year so far with a few wins already!)
I was thinking that that was an issue, so I created the Virtual Machine with
only VS2005 and nothing else. I have not installed the .net 3.5 frame work
on the VM machine.
From what I can tell its totally clean environment.
Which is why I am so confused and frustrated!
"kimiraikkonen" <ki*************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:f3**********************************@e53g2000 hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 8, 10:39 am, "Aussie Rules" <aus...@nospam.comwrote:
>Hi,
I have a basic app that I have build and am trying to use the click
once/publish feature to make the installation.
I have create a Virtual Machine using XP SP2, install VS.2005(aka dev)
and
created the project.
I have a second Virtual Machine also with XP SP2(aka Clean), nothing else
installed.
When I use the Clean machine to run the installation it first wants to to
install dotNet framework 3.5
I don't want to have the user having to install 62mb of .net 3.5
framework
when the application is build for 2.0
I have checked the setting for the publish now function, and the only
Prerequisite is .net framework 2.0
Even when I unclick this (to test) the application installation still
wants
to install .net 3.5 framework.
What is going on!!!
I want to have XP Sp2 users using my applicaton, so since they already
have
2.0 then I don't have to install anything but my little application
Hi Aussie,
Just a guess, if you have used VS 2008 for a while then the target
framework may have been set to 3.5,then 2.0 clients may have forced to
use 3.5.
Onur
Under the Application tab of your project's properties, check the Target
Framework. My guess is that it is set to .Net 3.5 instead of .Net 2.0.
RobinS.
GoldMail.com
-------------------------------------
"Aussie Rules" <au****@nospam.comwrote in message
news:eO**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Hi,
I have a basic app that I have build and am trying to use the click
once/publish feature to make the installation.
I have create a Virtual Machine using XP SP2, install VS.2005(aka dev) and
created the project.
I have a second Virtual Machine also with XP SP2(aka Clean), nothing else
installed.
When I use the Clean machine to run the installation it first wants to to
install dotNet framework 3.5
I don't want to have the user having to install 62mb of .net 3.5 framework
when the application is build for 2.0
I have checked the setting for the publish now function, and the only
Prerequisite is .net framework 2.0
Even when I unclick this (to test) the application installation still
wants to install .net 3.5 framework.
What is going on!!!
I want to have XP Sp2 users using my applicaton, so since they already
have 2.0 then I don't have to install anything but my little application
I'm assuming you are publishing with VS2008, by the way.
RobinS.
"RobinS" <ro****@imnottelling.comwrote in message
news:Dd******************************@comcast.com. ..
Under the Application tab of your project's properties, check the Target
Framework. My guess is that it is set to .Net 3.5 instead of .Net 2.0.
RobinS.
GoldMail.com
-------------------------------------
"Aussie Rules" <au****@nospam.comwrote in message
news:eO**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>Hi,
I have a basic app that I have build and am trying to use the click
once/publish feature to make the installation.
I have create a Virtual Machine using XP SP2, install VS.2005(aka dev)
and created the project.
I have a second Virtual Machine also with XP SP2(aka Clean), nothing else
installed.
When I use the Clean machine to run the installation it first wants to to
install dotNet framework 3.5
I don't want to have the user having to install 62mb of .net 3.5
framework when the application is build for 2.0
I have checked the setting for the publish now function, and the only
Prerequisite is .net framework 2.0
Even when I unclick this (to test) the application installation still
wants to install .net 3.5 framework.
What is going on!!!
I want to have XP Sp2 users using my applicaton, so since they already
have 2.0 then I don't have to install anything but my little application
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: lawrence |
last post by:
I notice that when my weblog software tries to contact
www.weblogs.com, to use the update service, my whole site (all PHP)
slows down. Contacting www.weblogs.com can take a long time. I can't...
|
by: TheKeith |
last post by:
I'm writing a javascript function that is supposed to open and close a box
by adjusting the height style of a div container, everytime the link is
clicked. For some reason though, the function only...
|
by: Bamber |
last post by:
Why does f get returned ? (compiled with gcc).
#include<stdio.h>
int func(int a);
main()
{ int f;
f=func(7);
printf("f=%d",f);
|
by: dbuchanan |
last post by:
Hello,
I can find no reason for this code to run twice. Can you help me?
It may have something to do with it being a overrides sub but stepping
through during debug does *not* bear this out.
...
|
by: Daniel Manes |
last post by:
I'm baffled. I have a column in a SQL Server Express database called
"Longitude," which is a float. When I view the table in a DataGridView,
some of the numbers, which only have two decimal places...
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?UmljaA==?= |
last post by:
Greetings,
I have been using the Click Once deployment feature of VS2005 - very nice.
I had IE6 at the time when I started using Click Once Deployment, and
everything worked fine. But then my...
|
by: pbmods |
last post by:
A somewhat obscure hack has emerged recently that is an offshoot of the now-infamous XSS.
It is known as Cross-Site Request Forgery, or XSRF for short. XSRF is a form of temporary identity theft...
|
by: wreed06 |
last post by:
I have 2 problems. In my webpage, I have a dropdown list with a button that takes the user to a popup window specific to the option. I am using Firefox 2.0.0.13. I have successfully validated my HTML...
|
by: Sh4wn |
last post by:
Hi,
first, python is one of my fav languages, and i'll definitely keep
developing with it. But, there's 1 one thing what I -really- miss:
data hiding. I know member vars are private when you...
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
| |
