Call Close in Using Block with StreamWriter

[=?Utf-8?B?Sm9obk1TeXJhc29mdA==?=]

I'm coding in VB.NET 2005 with a Using block and a StreamWriter as in

Using strWrite As New IO.StreamWriter(fileName, True)
strWrite.WriteLine(Now & vbTab & cLineToWrite)
End Using

Should I explicitly call the Close method on the StreamWriter or is the
object closed and disposed when the Using block is exited?

Thanks for your insights.

[kimiraikkonen]

On Apr 7, 10:53 pm, JohnMSyrasoft
<[e-mail]:

I'm coding in VB.NET 2005 with a Using block and a StreamWriter as in

Using strWrite As New IO.StreamWriter(fileName, True)
strWrite.WriteLine(Now & vbTab & cLineToWrite)
End Using

Should I explicitly call the Close method on the StreamWriter or is the
object closed and disposed when the Using block is exited?

Thanks for your insights.

As far as i know, "End Using" statement is enough to dispose resource.
No need to use close method in that case.

[Tom Shelton]

On 2008-04-07, JohnMSyrasoft <Jo***********@discussions.microsoft.comwrote:

I'm coding in VB.NET 2005 with a Using block and a StreamWriter as in

Using strWrite As New IO.StreamWriter(fileName, True)
strWrite.WriteLine(Now & vbTab & cLineToWrite)
End Using

Should I explicitly call the Close method on the StreamWriter or is the
object closed and disposed when the Using block is exited?

Thanks for your insights.

It is closed when the using block exits - even if there is an error,
that is the point of a using block. Calling close explicitly, just makes
for redundant code.

--
Tom Shelton

[Scott M.]

"Tom Shelton" <to*********@YOUKNOWTHEDRILLcomcast.netwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Calling close explicitly, just makes for redundant code.

--
Tom Shelton

Not necessarially. You may be done using the object, but not have hit the
"End Using" yet. With a resource like a file (that others may need to
access), it may be a good idea to call close() explicitly as soon as you are
done using it and use "End Using" as a fail-safe.

-Scott

[Tom Shelton]

On 2008-04-07, Scott M. <sm**@nospam.nospamwrote:

>
"Tom Shelton" <to*********@YOUKNOWTHEDRILLcomcast.netwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>Calling close explicitly, just makes for redundant code.

--
Tom Shelton

Not necessarially. You may be done using the object, but not have hit the
"End Using" yet. With a resource like a file (that others may need to
access), it may be a good idea to call close() explicitly as soon as you are
done using it and use "End Using" as a fail-safe.

-Scott

IMHO, that would be a rare case, and one that I would suggest is
probably in need of refactoring. In general, with files the rule is
get in, get what you need, and get out. No, in general, I would stand
by my original post.

--
Tom Shelton

[Scott M.]

IMHO, I don't think it's as rare as you may think. If I'm going to need to
re-open the stream after I close it, I wouldn't want it disposed yet, but I
would want it closed while I'm not using it.
"Tom Shelton" <to*********@YOUKNOWTHEDRILLcomcast.netwrote in message
news:eO**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

On 2008-04-07, Scott M. <sm**@nospam.nospamwrote:

>>
"Tom Shelton" <to*********@YOUKNOWTHEDRILLcomcast.netwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>Calling close explicitly, just makes for redundant code.

--
Tom Shelton

Not necessarially. You may be done using the object, but not have hit
the
"End Using" yet. With a resource like a file (that others may need to
access), it may be a good idea to call close() explicitly as soon as you
are
done using it and use "End Using" as a fail-safe.

-Scott

IMHO, that would be a rare case, and one that I would suggest is
probably in need of refactoring. In general, with files the rule is
get in, get what you need, and get out. No, in general, I would stand
by my original post.

--
Tom Shelton