How to convert the C# code below to VB.NET?

[yxq]

How to convert the C# code below to VB.NET? thank you.

AddLogicalDrive(((char)('A' + i)).ToString() + ":");

[=?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgQW50b24=?=]

AddLogicalDrive((ChrW(Asc("A"c) + i)).ToString() & ":")
--
http://www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com
C++ to C#
C++ to VB
C++ to Java
C++ to Ruby
Instant C#: VB to C# converter
Instant VB: C# to VB converter
Instant C++: convert VB or C# to C++/CLI
"yxq" wrote:

How to convert the C# code below to VB.NET? thank you.

AddLogicalDrive(((char)('A' + i)).ToString() + ":");

[Cor Ligthert[MVP]]

David,

AddLogicalDrive((ChrW(Asc("A"c) + i)).ToString() & ":")

It is the best answer of course until now and probably the way a good
converter will make it like this, however I find this kind of questions
always funny.

In my idea there has to be a kind of check if the indexer "i "cannot be less
then 0 and more then 26, at that moment the chr should be enoug althoug I
would normaly also advice to use the chrw. In other words as you don't use
the ascW there is no need to use the chrW.

I know what you can write, however it is not critique, I was just curious
about the answers and in this case there was something where this did aply,

Cor

[=?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgQW50b24=?=]

Thanks for pointing that out Cor.
We are currently correcting Instant VB to be able to better detect the need
to use ChrW and AscW to simulate C# 'character math', and this inconsistency
(using ChrW, but not AscW) needs to be addressed.
--
http://www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com
C++ to C#
C++ to VB
C++ to Java
C++ to Ruby
Instant C#: VB to C# converter
Instant VB: C# to VB converter
Instant C++: convert VB or C# to C++/CLI
"Cor Ligthert[MVP]" wrote:

David,

AddLogicalDrive((ChrW(Asc("A"c) + i)).ToString() & ":")

It is the best answer of course until now and probably the way a good
converter will make it like this, however I find this kind of questions
always funny.

In my idea there has to be a kind of check if the indexer "i "cannot be less
then 0 and more then 26, at that moment the chr should be enoug althoug I
would normaly also advice to use the chrw. In other words as you don't use
the ascW there is no need to use the chrW.

I know what you can write, however it is not critique, I was just curious
about the answers and in this case there was something where this did aply,

Cor