471,851 Members | 1,222 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post +

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 471,851 software developers and data experts.

How Does a Procedure Know When To Shut Down?

I'm confused about the proper way to shut down my application.

I have a form which instantiates a control, which instantiates another
control, which instantiates yet another control that runs a time-
consuming loop. I put Application.DoEvents() into the loop so the user
can continue to work on the form while the loop is running. Everything
works great until the user wants to exit the application. The
application will not close until the loop is done. That's bad. I need
to interrupt the loop and close immediately when the user wants to

I've figured out that I can respond to the FormClosing event on the
form, then call a procedure in the child control which calls a
procedure in the grandchild control which calls a procedure in the
great-grandchild control that sets a flag and stops the loop.

My question is this: Do I really have to write a set of cascading
procedures to shut down the application like this, or is there a more
elegant way? It seems to me that the application must "know" it is
waiting for my loop to finish. How can I use this awareness from
within my code? Is there some event I can respond to, or some
application variable I can check?

I used to think Finalize existed for this purpose -- I thought it's
job was to announce a pending shutdown to every instance of a class/
control. However, I've learned that Finalize doesn't get called until
after the loop is already done, so it obviously doesn't help in this

By the way, I've browsed this newsgroup and I've seen the suggestions
that starting a new thread is preferable to DoEvents. I'm working on
that, but I have a lot of cross-threading problems to resolve first.
In any case, I believe that is a separate issue. Even if I run my loop
on a separate thread, instead of using DoEvents, I still need to
figure out how to shut it down, right?

Aug 7 '07 #1
1 1727
"TC" <go*********@yahoo.comschrieb
By the way, I've browsed this newsgroup and I've seen the
suggestions that starting a new thread is preferable to
If you hadn't mentioned it now, I would have suggested to use a
separate thread. :)


Thank you for the reply. On your encouragement, I put extra effort
into creating a new thread, and now everything works great. The
whole application came together -- even the clean shut-down. I
really like this solution -- it works far better than expected. Now
that I know how to do multi-threading, I suspect I may never use
DoEvents again.
Congrats! :-)
Aug 8 '07 #2

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

reply views Thread by Robert Fitzpatrick | last post: by
1 post views Thread by =?Utf-8?B?c3dlbGxtZWw=?= | last post: by
reply views Thread by NeoPa | last post: by
reply views Thread by YellowAndGreen | last post: by

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.