which famework will be used

[Jack Russell]

If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Thanks

[Mattias Sjögren]

Jack,

>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Andersson?=]

Mattias Sjögren wrote:

Jack,

>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

On a side note: Framework 3.0 is not really a framework version. It
mostly just installs WCF, WWF and WPF, the framework that is used for
those is still 2.0.

The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5.

Yes, it does not lack elements of confusion. ;)

--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com

[Rad [Visual C# MVP]]

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:23:24 +0100, Göran Andersson wrote:

Mattias Sjögren wrote:

>Jack,

>>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.

Mattias

On a side note: Framework 3.0 is not really a framework version. It
mostly just installs WCF, WWF and WPF, the framework that is used for
those is still 2.0.

The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5.

Yes, it does not lack elements of confusion. ;)

I truly hope Microsoft will learn from the supreme confusion they
introduced with this choice of naming it .NET 3 and not repeat it again!
--
Bits.Bytes
http://bytes.thinkersroom.com

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Andersson?=]

Rad [Visual C# MVP] wrote:

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:23:24 +0100, Göran Andersson wrote:

>Mattias Sjögren wrote:

>>Jack,

If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.
Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.

Mattias

On a side note: Framework 3.0 is not really a framework version. It
mostly just installs WCF, WWF and WPF, the framework that is used for
those is still 2.0.

The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5.

Yes, it does not lack elements of confusion. ;)

I truly hope Microsoft will learn from the supreme confusion they
introduced with this choice of naming it .NET 3 and not repeat it again!

I am quite sure that they will not call any more products .NET 3. ;)

--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

"Rad [Visual C# MVP]" <no****@nospam.comschrieb:

>On a side note: Framework 3.0 is not really a framework version. It
mostly just installs WCF, WWF and WPF, the framework that is used for
those is still 2.0.

The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5.

Yes, it does not lack elements of confusion. ;)

I truly hope Microsoft will learn from the supreme confusion they
introduced with this choice of naming it .NET 3 and not repeat it again!

With marketing and legal departments making such decisions I would not vote
on this ;-).

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>

[Rad [Visual C# MVP]]

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:40:10 +0100, Herfried K. Wagner [MVP] wrote:

"Rad [Visual C# MVP]" <no****@nospam.comschrieb:

>>On a side note: Framework 3.0 is not really a framework version. It
mostly just installs WCF, WWF and WPF, the framework that is used for
those is still 2.0.

The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5.

Yes, it does not lack elements of confusion. ;)

I truly hope Microsoft will learn from the supreme confusion they
introduced with this choice of naming it .NET 3 and not repeat it again!

With marketing and legal departments making such decisions I would not vote
on this ;-).

Ah well ... one can but hope :)
--
Bits.Bytes
http://bytes.thinkersroom.com

[=?Utf-8?B?RGVubmlz?=]

What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either VS2003
or apps developed with VS2003?
--
Dennis in Houston
"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:

Jack,

If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[RobinS]

It won't work. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1
Robin S.
---------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:BA**********************************@microsof t.com...

What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either
VS2003
or apps developed with VS2003?
--
Dennis in Houston
"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:

>Jack,

>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Jack Russell]

Are you sure, I am sure that I tried it and it did. I will try to do it
again.
Jack Russell

RobinS wrote:

It won't work. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1
Robin S.
---------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:BA**********************************@microsof t.com...

>>What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either
VS2003
or apps developed with VS2003?
--
Dennis in Houston
"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:

>>>Jack,
If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[RobinS]

I am sure.

Robin S.
======================
"Jack Russell" <ja***@norubbish.tpg.com.auwrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

Are you sure, I am sure that I tried it and it did. I will try to do it
again.
Jack Russell

RobinS wrote:

>It won't work. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1
Robin S.
---------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:BA**********************************@microso ft.com...

>>>What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either
VS2003
or apps developed with VS2003?
--
Dennis in Houston
"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:
Jack,
>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
>am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
>Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.

Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Jack Russell]

Robin

Of course you are right I am sorry, I was thinking of projects developed
with VS2003 running with framework 2.

Jack

RobinS wrote:

I am sure.

Robin S.
======================
"Jack Russell" <ja***@norubbish.tpg.com.auwrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>Are you sure, I am sure that I tried it and it did. I will try to do it
again.
Jack Russell

RobinS wrote:

>>>It won't work. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1
Robin S.
---------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:BA**********************************@micro soft.com...
What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either
VS2003
or apps developed with VS2003?
--
Dennis in Houston
"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:

>Jack,
>
>
>
>>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and 3)
>>am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
>>Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.
>
>Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
>
>
>Mattias
>
>--
>Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
>http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
>Please reply only to the newsgroup.
>

[RobinS]

You mean VS2005. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1.

Robin S.
---------------------
"Jack Russell" <ja***@norubbish.tpg.com.auwrote in message
news:eF**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Robin

Of course you are right I am sorry, I was thinking of projects developed
with VS2003 running with framework 2.

Jack

RobinS wrote:

>I am sure.

Robin S.
======================
"Jack Russell" <ja***@norubbish.tpg.com.auwrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>Are you sure, I am sure that I tried it and it did. I will try to do it
again.
Jack Russell

RobinS wrote:

It won't work. VS2003 only works with .Net 1.1
Robin S.
---------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:BA**********************************@micr osoft.com...
>What happens if I only have .net 2.0 framework and try to run either
>VS2003
>or apps developed with VS2003?
>--
>Dennis in Houston
>
>
>"Mattias Sjögren" wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jack,
>>
>>
>>
>>>If I have a machine with all 3 versions of the framework (1 , 2 and
>>>3)
>>>am I right in thinking that .net 2003 will choose to use version 1?
>>>Certainly that is what environment.version seems to show.
>>
>>Yes, VS2003 only targets version 1.1.
>>
>>
>>Mattias
>>
>>--
>>Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
>>http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
>>Please reply only to the newsgroup.
>>