By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
440,496 Members | 1,489 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 440,496 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

vb .net web page error before page_Init with IE6

P: n/a
I am running into a problem with a web page I have created when
viewing it in IE6 on some machines. The page has a database lookup.
The user enters an account name or number and clicks a lookup button.
This hits an AS400 database looks for matches and returns a dataset
that is used to populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the
entries from the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of
textboxes on the page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on
the page. The page has another database lookup. The user enters an
productname or number and clicks a lookup button. This hits an AS400
database looks for matches and returns a dataset that is used to
populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the entries from
the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of textboxes on the
page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on the page. The
problem is that on IE6 on some computers, the page runs the code to
lookup the data in the database, creates a dataset, binds the data to
a datagrid, and then IE6 freezes until it has to be closed due to not
responding. I have put in many many lines to log where I am at and I
IE is freezing after the page.dispose method is finished, but before
the next page_init is called.

The computers in question are using IE6 on XP Pro SP2. I use IE6 on
XP PRO SP2 here at work and everything is fine. I have also tried on
other computers using IE6, IE7, Firefox 1.x and 2.0 with no problems.
It is only IE6 on some machines. The processes for the account lookup
and the product lookup are identical except for the different tables
and fields.

So, what I am wondering is if there is anything that happens between
the dispose and page_init that I could try to intercept or if anyone
has heard of anything like this.

If you need code, let me know.

Please help. Thanks for reading this.

-Justin

Feb 13 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
102 Replies


P: n/a
Bo*************@gmail.com wrote:
I am running into a problem with a web page I have created when
viewing it in IE6 on some machines. The page has a database lookup.
The user enters an account name or number and clicks a lookup button.
This hits an AS400 database looks for matches and returns a dataset
that is used to populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the
entries from the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of
textboxes on the page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on
the page. The page has another database lookup. The user enters an
productname or number and clicks a lookup button. This hits an AS400
database looks for matches and returns a dataset that is used to
populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the entries from
the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of textboxes on the
page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on the page. The
problem is that on IE6 on some computers, the page runs the code to
lookup the data in the database, creates a dataset, binds the data to
a datagrid, and then IE6 freezes until it has to be closed due to not
responding. I have put in many many lines to log where I am at and I
IE is freezing after the page.dispose method is finished, but before
the next page_init is called.

The computers in question are using IE6 on XP Pro SP2. I use IE6 on
XP PRO SP2 here at work and everything is fine. I have also tried on
other computers using IE6, IE7, Firefox 1.x and 2.0 with no problems.
It is only IE6 on some machines. The processes for the account lookup
and the product lookup are identical except for the different tables
and fields.

So, what I am wondering is if there is anything that happens between
the dispose and page_init that I could try to intercept or if anyone
has heard of anything like this.
No, I have never heard of this. That's why I never use datasets to do
anything. I always do everything by using an object or collection of
strong typed objects using the IList interface so that the collection
can be bound to a control, which the object or objects being derived
from a database source such as a table and the object can persist itself.

It also seems that you have all your code in the code behind file, data
access, etc, all of it the whole nine yards in the code behind file,
which is a no no too. Are you doing that? Are you treating ASP.NET like
it's ASP 3.0 or lower, with data access and validation of data being
done in the code behind file and the user interface is directly
instantiating data access?

Feb 13 '07 #2

P: n/a


IE6 and IE7 work best with VB6

dotnet is a futile experiment in mediocrity
sorry kids

move on to php or something; or else grow some balls and demand a
complete solution from M$

On Feb 13, 1:59 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
BoogieWithSt...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running into a problem with a web page I have created when
viewing it in IE6 on some machines. The page has a database lookup.
The user enters an account name or number and clicks a lookup button.
This hits an AS400 database looks for matches and returns a dataset
that is used to populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the
entries from the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of
textboxes on the page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on
the page. The page has another database lookup. The user enters an
productname or number and clicks a lookup button. This hits an AS400
database looks for matches and returns a dataset that is used to
populate a datagrid. The user then selects one of the entries from
the list, this entry is used to populate a couple of textboxes on the
page and a couple of textboxes in a usercontrol on the page. The
problem is that on IE6 on some computers, the page runs the code to
lookup the data in the database, creates a dataset, binds the data to
a datagrid, and then IE6 freezes until it has to be closed due to not
responding. I have put in many many lines to log where I am at and I
IE is freezing after the page.dispose method is finished, but before
the next page_init is called.
The computers in question are using IE6 on XP Pro SP2. I use IE6 on
XP PRO SP2 here at work and everything is fine. I have also tried on
other computers using IE6, IE7, Firefox 1.x and 2.0 with no problems.
It is only IE6 on some machines. The processes for the account lookup
and the product lookup are identical except for the different tables
and fields.
So, what I am wondering is if there is anything that happens between
the dispose and page_init that I could try to intercept or if anyone
has heard of anything like this.

No, I have never heard of this. That's why I never use datasets to do
anything. I always do everything by using an object or collection of
strong typed objects using the IList interface so that the collection
can be bound to a control, which the object or objects being derived
from a database source such as a table and the object can persist itself.

It also seems that you have all your code in the code behind file, data
access, etc, all of it the whole nine yards in the code behind file,
which is a no no too. Are you doing that? Are you treating ASP.NET like
it's ASP 3.0 or lower, with data access and validation of data being
done in the code behind file and the user interface is directly
instantiating data access?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Feb 14 '07 #3

P: n/a
Larry Linson wrote:
>
IE6 and IE7 work best with VB6

dotnet is a futile experiment in mediocrity
sorry kids

move on to php or something; or else grow some balls and demand a
complete solution from M$
Sorry *chief*, if you knew what you were talking about, you would be
dangerous. I work with .Net solutions everyday both C# and VB.NET and
making that $$$$$$ too.

..NET is not only for Web centric solutions that use a browser but .NET
can also be used to develop Windows Desktop, Console Application, NT
Service, with the fore mentions solutions able to contact a Web server
if need be using HTTP or TCP using Binary or SOAP over HTTP Web Services
or Binary over TCP) and a whole host of other .NET application
solutions, down to cellular phones, watches and other such devices.

You have absolutely no clue as to what you're talking about period.

You should have your balls and your Johnson cut from you, shoved down
your throat, and your mouth sown shut for making such an ignorant post
as you have made here.
Feb 14 '07 #4

P: n/a
Mr. Arnold <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMThou milk-livered man. Thou damned
baseness. Thou loggerheaded bloody cannibal. Thou pot-bellied botchy
core. Ye blurted and ye denunciated:
if you knew what you were talking about, you would be dangerous.
Well done, DUHane. That has to be the PKB of the third millennium.

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_****************@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"
Feb 14 '07 #5

P: n/a
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER

UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.

it is a 25% solution at best.

Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?

STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT

there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers

eat a dick whore

DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6
On Feb 13, 10:37 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
Larry Linson wrote:
IE6 and IE7 work best with VB6
dotnet is a futile experiment in mediocrity
sorry kids
move on to php or something; or else grow some balls and demand a
complete solution from M$

Sorry *chief*, if you knew what you were talking about, you would be
dangerous. I work with .Net solutions everyday both C# and VB.NET and
making that $$$$$$ too.

.NET is not only for Web centric solutions that use a browser but .NET
can also be used to develop Windows Desktop, Console Application, NT
Service, with the fore mentions solutions able to contact a Web server
if need be using HTTP or TCP using Binary or SOAP over HTTP Web Services
or Binary over TCP) and a whole host of other .NET application
solutions, down to cellular phones, watches and other such devices.

You have absolutely no clue as to what you're talking about period.

You should have your balls and your Johnson cut from you, shoved down
your throat, and your mouth sown shut for making such an ignorant post
as you have made here.

Feb 14 '07 #6

P: n/a
pf******@hotmail.com Thou petty rebel. Thou riseth to play and go to bed
to work. Thou ingrown toenail. Thou tallow-face. Ye fulminated and ye
disagreed:
FUCKING HUSSY SPUNK SPITTER MOLL CLAM SMACKER UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS
NOT SEXY FUCKING BOX BUSTER UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
FUCKING FAT JOHNSON ONE EYED MONSTER SACK OF SHIT BITCH VAGINA SMEGMA
SLUT SNATCH CUM SHAG
FUCKING LOVE TRUNCHEON FLESH-BAGS UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE
VBSCRIPT FUCKING LOVE PILLOWS ASS MITES IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
FUCKING YELLOW BASTARD DOWN AND SURRENDER LICK TWAT VIRGIN SPUNK CRABS
SACK HELL SON OF A BITCH MAIN VEIN
FUCKING DUMBASS FLEAPIT BUTT SMASHER BUTT SMASHER UNNECESSARY CHANGE
IS NOT SEXY FUCKING BOOBIES UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
FUCKING WHORE VAGINA DECLINER ASSHOLE TITS PUSSY GODDAMN TIT BLOWJOB
COCKSUCKER PUSSY DICK
FUCKING TOWN-BIKE WHORE dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of FUCKING ANAL
FELCHING the places that VB6 works. CUNT SCRUBBER CLIT SHITHEAD HOOKER
LICK
FUCKING PUSSY LIPS GIBLET HONKIE OFFICE-PUMP FAST PARTY it is a 25%
solution at FUCKING BONER best. COCK SACK LESBIAN CUNT SCRUBBER DAMN
FUCKING SLEAZE-SLUT Does it make sense for programmers FUCKING
SHITFACE CAR WHORE to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FUCKING CRUTCH FOUR?
MINGE PUBES MUFF MAIN VEIN GAY CUM SAUSAGE JOCKEY TITS LABIA CUM
SLINGER BULL SHIT
FUCKING DICK OF DEATH ARSESUCKER BUGGERY EYESORE GREASE MONKEY STICK A
FUCKING CORK IN IT FUCKING CUNT DIPSHIT SHIT I'D DO YOU PIMP FART BALL
BAG CUNT SCRAPER BASTARD FUCKER FELLATIO BASTARD AXE WOUND
FUCKING CARNAL MEMBER HALF-WIT there's a hundred kids in China,
FUCKING ASS BLASTER CAR WHORE willing to work for 1/100th of FUCKING
FRUIT BAT FESTERED SORE what you do.. and they have FUCKING
COCKSUCKERS CUNT-STRETCHER free web servers; an IDE that FUCKING FARM
ANIMAL doesn't go 'visual fred' every 18 FUCKING ALLEY-CAT FLASH-GIRL
months and free database servers LESBIAN BUM BANDIT CUNT-STICKER LABIA
FUCKING BITCH'S BLIND CRACK A FAT eat a dick whore HOOKER BITCH STAB
QUEER KNOB
FUCKING BEAT MOLL PUSSY-POKER DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE FUCKING LOVE
CUSHIONS BACK TO VB6 TIT CUNT SCRUBBER GAYLORD CUNNY-CATCHER CHUTNEY
FERRET PORK SWORD BULLSHIT BUTT COCK
FUCKING FUCKSTICK ASS IN A SLING POLACK ARSE LICK CARNAL STUMP
BACK-DOOR MAN PECKERHEAD On Feb 13, 10:37 pm, FUCKING BELLY-BUMP FLIP
YOUR CLIT "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote: FUCKING
CUNT-STRETCHER RIMJOB GONADS SON OF A BITCH PORK SWORD BASTARD TIT
MINGE SACK DOGGY

Feb 14 '07 #7

P: n/a
pf******@hotmail.com wrote:
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution on
the client or server side.

You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file that
has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even period,
with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only used to
provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc, etc.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
>
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>

dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.
Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET. I
have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I don't have a
problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have asked it to do and
more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done everything and more I
have asked it to do programming wise.
>
it is a 25% solution at best.

Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?

STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>
there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers
They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET
>
eat a dick whore

DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6
I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.

http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx

..Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
..NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.

MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard owned
and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be ratified as a
standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr..._and_Licensing

I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.

It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of your
mind.
Feb 14 '07 #8

P: n/a
Amaurohydnum Moraviensis aka I don't have to say it wrote:
>

Well done, DUHane. That has to be the PKB of the third millennium.
You're right there with the rest of us you hag. You're a double pot
calling kettle black. Damn any millennium, as you have never changed
your stinking tampon since the beginning of time. How sharp is that on
your tampon change?

<hag>
Feb 14 '07 #9

P: n/a
Bo*************@gmail.com wrote:
>
The computers in question are using IE6 on XP Pro SP2. I use IE6 on
XP PRO SP2 here at work and everything is fine. I have also tried on
other computers using IE6, IE7, Firefox 1.x and 2.0 with no problems.
It is only IE6 on some machines. The processes for the account lookup
and the product lookup are identical except for the different tables
and fields.
The bottom line is there is something different about those machines
you're having problems with. You need to find out what the difference is
and address the problem.

Feb 14 '07 #10

P: n/a
Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.

I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET



On Feb 14, 2:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
pfc_s...@hotmail.com wrote:
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER

You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution on
the client or server side.

You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file that
has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even period,
with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only used to
provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc, etc.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.

Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET. I
have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I don't have a
problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have asked it to do and
more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done everything and more I
have asked it to do programming wise.
it is a 25% solution at best.
Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers

They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET
eat a dick whore
DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6

I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.

http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx

.Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
.NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.

MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard owned
and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be ratified as a
standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr...tion_and_Licen...

I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.

It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of your
mind.

Feb 14 '07 #11

P: n/a
and I don't know what I'm talking about?

WHY DOES VBA STILL LIVE IN OFFICE?
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN VBS?
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN ACTIVEX SCRIPTS IN SQL SERVER JOBS?
_MOTHER_FUCKING_SERIOUS_LY_ BITCH

SHUT THE FUCK UP UNLESS YOU WANT TO START TALKING _FACTS_

THEY SOLD US ON PERFORMANCE-- WE DID NOT NEED MORE PERFORMANCE, THANK
YOU VERY MUCH
AND LAUNCHING A DOTNET APP TAKES _LONGER_ THAN VB6 APPS

AND THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT DOTNET FRAMEWORK IS _NOT_ ON 10% OF THE
DESKTOPS IN THE WORLD.

so what's the point of developing apps of desktops using dotnet?

it's not even possible to determine which version of the framework is
on machine X.

Seriously; kid.. I've got a machine under my desk.. please tell me how
I determine which version of the framework is on it?

because i've never gottan _ANY_ answer from work; and the MS kb
article is FLAT OUT MOTHER FUCKING WRONG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG

eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
eat shit and die dotnet FAG
On Feb 14, 2:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
pfc_s...@hotmail.com wrote:
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER

You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution on
the client or server side.

You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file that
has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even period,
with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only used to
provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc, etc.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.

Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET. I
have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I don't have a
problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have asked it to do and
more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done everything and more I
have asked it to do programming wise.
it is a 25% solution at best.
Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers

They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET
eat a dick whore
DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6

I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.

http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx

.Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
.NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.

MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard owned
and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be ratified as a
standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr...tion_and_Licen...

I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.

It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of your
mind.

Feb 14 '07 #12

P: n/a
2/3rds of the offical lifetime of Vb6 was in the new millenium so STFU
kid

stop using BETA SOFTWARE

you are merely a PAWN in a losing battle by some paranoid GOOKS,
NIGGERS AND CHINKS IN REDMOND

SPEAK ENGLISH OR DIE AND FUCK DOTNET


On Feb 14, 3:25 am, Maximum Hag <Maximum...@Hag.comwrote:
Amaurohydnum Moraviensis aka I don't have to say it wrote:
Well done, DUHane. That has to be the PKB of the third millennium.

You're right there with the rest of us you hag. You're a double pot
calling kettle black. Damn any millennium, as you have never changed
your stinking tampon since the beginning of time. How sharp is that on
your tampon change?

<hag>

Feb 14 '07 #13

P: n/a
ASP.net doesn't support the WORLDS MOST POPULAR LANGAUGE

STICK A FORK IN IT KID, MOVE BACK TO A PRACTICAL LANGUAGE

On Feb 14, 5:15 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
BoogieWithSt...@gmail.com wrote:
The computers in question are using IE6 on XP Pro SP2. I use IE6 on
XP PRO SP2 here at work and everything is fine. I have also tried on
other computers using IE6, IE7, Firefox 1.x and 2.0 with no problems.
It is only IE6 on some machines. The processes for the account lookup
and the product lookup are identical except for the different tables
and fields.

The bottom line is there is something different about those machines
you're having problems with. You need to find out what the difference is
and address the problem.

Feb 14 '07 #14

P: n/a
RE:

Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
I
have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I don't have
a
problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have asked it to do
and
more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done everything and more I
have asked it to do programming wise.


WHAT ABOUT VBS, VBA AND SQL SERVER JOBS?
WHAT ABOUT VBS, VBA AND SQL SERVER JOBS?
WHAT ABOUT VBS, VBA AND SQL SERVER JOBS?
WHAT ABOUT VBS, VBA AND SQL SERVER JOBS?
WHAT ABOUT VBS, VBA AND SQL SERVER JOBS?
because that is 40% of my workload; the rest is writing SQL.
AND I RECCOMEND THAT EVERYONE LEAVES THE MS CAMP BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED
US FOR THE MOTHER FUCKING LAST TIME

ROFL



On Feb 14, 2:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
pfc_s...@hotmail.com wrote:
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER

You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution on
the client or server side.

You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file that
has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even period,
with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only used to
provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc, etc.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.

Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET. I
have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I don't have a
problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have asked it to do and
more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done everything and more I
have asked it to do programming wise.
it is a 25% solution at best.
Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT

You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers

They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET
eat a dick whore
DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6

I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.

http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx

.Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
.NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.

MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard owned
and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be ratified as a
standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr...tion_and_Licen...

I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.

It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of your
mind.

Feb 14 '07 #15

P: n/a
please provide title and page number of said books
Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.

I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
On Feb 14, 2:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
>pfc_s...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on the client or server side.

You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file
that has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even
period, with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only
used to provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc,
etc.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
>>UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>>dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.
Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to
.NET. I have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I
don't have a problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have
asked it to do and more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done
everything and more I have asked it to do programming wise.
>>it is a 25% solution at best.

Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?

STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>>there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers
They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to
.NET
>>eat a dick whore

DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6
I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.

http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx

.Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
.NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.

MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard
owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be
ratified as a standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr...tion_and_Licen
...

I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.

It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of
your mind.

Feb 14 '07 #16

P: n/a
Jay Parzych wrote:
please provide title and page number of said books
>Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479302.aspx

I am only the messenger.
Feb 14 '07 #17

P: n/a
Larry Linson wrote:
Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
Here you go little one.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479302.aspx

I am just the messenger.
Feb 14 '07 #18

P: n/a
I am pretty darn sure it is in 'Web Database Development Step by
Step .NET edition'

I can't find it right now though and tonights Valentine's
I will look it up tomorrow I'm heading out for a meeting 2 hours away

if this book was just flat out wrong-- that would be great.
this is the single reason I've refused to consider ASP.net for
_ANYTHING_

I mean seriously here. I've been writing BASIC since the Commodore 64
and I will never ever ever consider any Java or JavaScript or C# or C+
+ or C of C# or JScript solution.

I REFUSE TO USE THEM; VB WAS THE WORLDS MOST POPULAR LANGUAGE CIRCA
1998-2002

(well that and the fact that Office Web Components has no replacement
in ASP.net ROFL)

I will definitely find the reference and get it to you... I'm thikning
it was a book geared towards VB people and it specifically said that
clientside vbScript does not work in ASP.net.

The funny thing is; I could have sworn it was an orange book; not the
black covers.. I just don't see any orange ASP.net books on my shelf..
I will find it and produce

If the book is WRONG I fully expect MS to send me a new copy of the
book.

and if the book is RIGHT (which I believe it is-- since I tried to get
it workign for a month back in '03 and I couldn't get anywhere; and I
emailed a whole ton of people at MS about it any nobody could tell me
a way to get it working)

of course; they fired me for bitching about VB and SQL Server; I
mean.. they con us into .NET instead of fixing SQL authentication?
ROFL how does this company get away with this crap?

so it's not like anything MS says or does (except bring back VB com,
and / or make VB.net a complete replacement; including OFFICE VBA, SQL
JOBS, VBS FILES AND _CLIENTSIDE DHTML PROGRAMMING_)

trust me; I will find the reference for sure


On Feb 14, 9:28 am, Jay Parzych <jimp...@cox.netwrote:
please provide title and page number of said books
Dear Mr Arnold:
RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
I HAVE BOOKS FROM MS PRESS THAT SAID THAT CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IS NOT
PERMITTED IN ASP.NET
On Feb 14, 2:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
pfc_s...@hotmail.com wrote:
>UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
UNTIL MS BRINGS BACK CLIENTSIDE VBSCRIPT IN ASP.NET I WILL NOT LAY
DOWN AND SURRENDER
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on the client or server side.
You can even use pure JavaScript with the ASP.NET code behind file
that has no Web form or Web controls, eliminating the Post Back even
period, with Ajax Pro for .NET. The .NET Code Behind file is only
used to provide proxies for utilities such access to databases, etc,
etc.
>http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
>UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>dotnet doesn't work in 1/4 of the places that VB6 works.
Again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to
.NET. I have been using VB.NET and have used VB 6 for many years. I
don't have a problem using VB.NET. It has done everything I have
asked it to do and more programming wise. And so has C# .NET done
everything and more I have asked it to do programming wise.
>it is a 25% solution at best.
>Does it make sense for programmers to go from ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
>STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT DIPSHIT
You don't know what you're talking about when it comes to .NET.
>there's a hundred kids in China, willing to work for 1/100th of what
you do.. and they have free web servers; an IDE that doesn't go
'visual fred' every 18 months and free database servers
They can do whatever they want there in that country. It doesn't hold
water here in the US.
And again, you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to
.NET
>eat a dick whore
>DOTNET IS A FAILURE, MOVE BACK TO VB6
I would say that the rest of the software language developers would
disagree with you.
>http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx
.Net is a standard that is owned by the ISO and ECMA. MS doesn't own
.NET. MS owns VB.NET which is proprietary to MS. MS gave .NET away so
that it could ratified as a *standard* to be used by anyone who has
contacted the ISO and ECMA to use the common .Net Framework CLI/CLR
which is common to all .NET languages.
MS doesn't own C# .NET either which has been ratified as standard
owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA. C++ will be next to be
ratified as a standard owned and controlled by the ISO and ECMA
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Fr...tion_and_Licen
...
I like your lip service that won't hold water. .NET is not going
anywhere and it will be used regardless of you like it or not.
It's plain and simple. You're out of touch with reality and out of
your mind.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Feb 14 '07 #19

P: n/a
Larry Linson wrote:
and I don't know what I'm talking about?

WHY DOES VBA STILL LIVE IN OFFICE?
Who cares about VBA being used in Office, when you can use .NET to
access office solutions?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/311452
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN VBS?
I would suspect that you have no *clue* on how to do it.

http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/nettocom.asp
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN ACTIVEX SCRIPTS IN SQL SERVER JOBS?

Who cares about *you* not being able to use ActiveX scripts in SQL Server?

Maybe, it's because you have no *clue* and what .NET language to use.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/232394

You should turn in your .NET badge.
Feb 14 '07 #20

P: n/a
Larry Linson wrote:
ASP.net doesn't support the WORLDS MOST POPULAR LANGAUGE

STICK A FORK IN IT KID, MOVE BACK TO A PRACTICAL LANGUAGE
It's your opinion and it's a dime a dozen and I would say pretty much
worthless.
Feb 14 '07 #21

P: n/a
Larry silly clown and big mouth Linson wrote:

<snipped>

I am not even going to bother here. You are a *clown* beyond *clowns*.

<g>
Feb 14 '07 #22

P: n/a
Larry big mouth Linson wrote:
2/3rds of the offical lifetime of Vb6 was in the new millenium so STFU
kid

stop using BETA SOFTWARE

you are merely a PAWN in a losing battle by some paranoid GOOKS,
NIGGERS AND CHINKS IN REDMOND
This person is truly out of its mind and has lost it.

LOL
Feb 14 '07 #23

P: n/a
Jay Parzych wrote:
please provide title and page number of said books
>Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.
http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxPro
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...2a(VS.80).aspx

I am just the messenger.

And the boy is talking MS Press books that only give you a foundation to
start with and nothing else. The boy couldn't change gears if the gear
hit him in his big mouth.
Feb 14 '07 #24

P: n/a
Larry Linson wrote:
Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.
http://www.devasp.net/net/articles/display/232.html
Feb 14 '07 #26

P: n/a
I don't need to change gears yet LoL; visual fred is right around the
corner _AGAIN_

On Feb 14, 10:46 am, Maximum Hag <Maximum...@Hag.comwrote:
Jay Parzych wrote:
please provide title and page number of said books
Dear Mr Arnold:
RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxProhttp:...2a(VS.80).aspx

I am just the messenger.

And the boy is talking MS Press books that only give you a foundation to
start with and nothing else. The boy couldn't change gears if the gear
hit him in his big mouth.

Feb 15 '07 #27

P: n/a
I know what .NET language to use.

IT SURE AS FUCK AINT GOING TO BE ANYTHING ON THE MARKET RIGHT NOW;
DOTNET DOES NOT WORK IN 3/4 OF THE PLACES OF VB6
Yes, I do know what 'Visual Studio Tools for Office' are.
I just don't believe in unnecessary complexity; VBA / VBS / VB6 does
all that is necessary

On Feb 14, 10:15 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
Larry Linson wrote:
and I don't know what I'm talking about?
WHY DOES VBA STILL LIVE IN OFFICE?

Who cares about VBA being used in Office, when you can use .NET to
access office solutions?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/311452
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN VBS?

I would suspect that you have no *clue* on how to do it.

http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/nettocom.asp
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN ACTIVEX SCRIPTS IN SQL SERVER JOBS?

Who cares about *you* not being able to use ActiveX scripts in SQL Server?

Maybe, it's because you have no *clue* and what .NET language to use.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/232394

You should turn in your .NET badge.

Feb 15 '07 #28

P: n/a
and are you mother fucking kidding me?

C++

THAT IS FOR FAGS

WE HAD THE MARKETSHARE, WE HAD A REAL IDE

MOTHER FUCKING SCREW ALL C AND ALL JAVA


On Feb 14, 10:15 am, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
Larry Linson wrote:
and I don't know what I'm talking about?
WHY DOES VBA STILL LIVE IN OFFICE?

Who cares about VBA being used in Office, when you can use .NET to
access office solutions?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/311452
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN VBS?

I would suspect that you have no *clue* on how to do it.

http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/nettocom.asp
WHY CANT I USE DOTNET IN ACTIVEX SCRIPTS IN SQL SERVER JOBS?

Who cares about *you* not being able to use ActiveX scripts in SQL Server?

Maybe, it's because you have no *clue* and what .NET language to use.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/232394

You should turn in your .NET badge.

Feb 15 '07 #29

P: n/a
<Plankthat's a soft logical <plonk>
Feb 15 '07 #30

P: n/a
<Plankthat's a soft logical <plonk>.
Feb 15 '07 #31

P: n/a
<Plankthat's a soft logical <plonk>.
Feb 15 '07 #32

P: n/a
You should trun in your.Net decoder ring. You should get out of
programming.
Feb 15 '07 #33

P: n/a
You should turn in your .Net holster. You should get out of programming.
Feb 15 '07 #34

P: n/a
I'll bet that *hag* of yours knows more about programming than you do.
You should get out of any programming, period.

Did you get that *hag* a special *bag* for V-Day?

http://www.saltypawsbiscuits.com/

It's a wonderful picture of your *hag* at the beach that you took.

Long

http://www.saltypawsbiscuits.com/bea...web)_thumb.jpg

Short

http://tinyurl.com/33anbm
Feb 15 '07 #35

P: n/a
Thanks Mr. Arnold,

You raised my level of understanding a bit more today.

Bruce

"Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote in message
news:KE*****************@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
Larry Linson wrote:
>Dear Mr Arnold:

RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.

http://www.devasp.net/net/articles/display/232.html

Feb 15 '07 #36

P: n/a
Bruce W. Darby wrote:
Thanks Mr. Arnold,

You raised my level of understanding a bit more today.

Bruce
You're welcomed. I have been in IT since 1971. I have been programing
professionally since 1980 on various platforms using many types of
languages. Really, nothing has changed that much.

The only thing that has changed is the rift raft that now populates the
programming ranks, calling themselves programmers.
Feb 15 '07 #37

P: n/a
1971.... Ah, the 8th grade for me! LOL I don't feel so old anymore. :) But
there is one thing I think I need to gag out.... Aaron (i.e., susie, hooker,
punjab_tom, et. al.) is correct when he stated that MS has stated that
VBScript is not supported in ASP.Net. I found an article that I posted
earlier today from the MSDN site claiming that factoid. I'm not sure if
anyone has been able to rebut 'this' particular claim by said individual.
All of the articles that you posted in rebuttal show no VBScript being used
on the client side of a .Net web app. It's all Javascript. They do mention
using VB.Net to code, but not VBScript. My thinking on this is that MS felt
that VB.Net was simple enough to use in a scripting environment that they
did not feel it necessary to continue that particular subset of the Visual
Basic language into the .Net environment, not to mention the fact that WMI
has pretty much replaced VBScript and that IS ASP.Net capable. :)

Bruce

"Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote in message
news:g6*****************@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
Bruce W. Darby wrote:
>Thanks Mr. Arnold,

You raised my level of understanding a bit more today.

Bruce

You're welcomed. I have been in IT since 1971. I have been programing
professionally since 1980 on various platforms using many types of
languages. Really, nothing has changed that much.

The only thing that has changed is the rift raft that now populates the
programming ranks, calling themselves programmers.

Feb 15 '07 #38

P: n/a
Bruce W. Darby wrote:
1971.... Ah, the 8th grade for me! LOL I don't feel so old anymore. :) But
there is one thing I think I need to gag out.... Aaron (i.e., susie, hooker,
punjab_tom, et. al.) is correct when he stated that MS has stated that
VBScript is not supported in ASP.Net. I found an article that I posted
earlier today from the MSDN site claiming that factoid. I'm not sure if
anyone has been able to rebut 'this' particular claim by said individual.
All of the articles that you posted in rebuttal show no VBScript being used
on the client side of a .Net web app. It's all Javascript. They do mention
using VB.Net to code, but not VBScript. My thinking on this is that MS felt
that VB.Net was simple enough to use in a scripting environment that they
did not feel it necessary to continue that particular subset of the Visual
Basic language into the .Net environment, not to mention the fact that WMI
has pretty much replaced VBScript and that IS ASP.Net capable. :)
Books are static and program development languages are not static. I
have shown you that .NET 2.0 can use VBscript or Javascript on the
client side and the scripting languages can call back to the Web server
to the CodeBehindFile that has no Webform or Web controls.

From what I have been told recently, and I can't verify it, is future
releases of .NET will be using Javascript as its main scripting language
, because it's more browser independent. The only time I have used
VBscript is with ASP 3.0 and below.

I really like using Ajax Pro for .Net, HTML, DHTML and Javascript with
Javascript calling back to the ASP.Net CodeBehindFile to do the back-end
processing via Ajax Pro.

But I now see that I can do the same thing possibly with ASP.Net 2.0 and
not need Ajax Pro. I don't know if I can bind an object, collection of
objects, or ADO datasets using this .NET 2.0 method and bring things
back to Javascript like I can with Ajax Pro, which Ajax Pro is free.

If you really want to see how powerful .Net solutions can be or will be,
then I suggest that you get one of the CSLA books, put the CSLA
Framework and demo project together and run it. I base all of my OOPs
concepts on the CSLA base objects with the Remoting, Web service, etc
etc ripped out. I keep the concepts of properties, methods, object
state, ADO.NET (SmartData reader) and other concepts of persisting data.

http://www.lhotka.net/Article.aspx?i...b-e0059cc82ee7

There are books for .Netframe work 1.x.
Feb 15 '07 #39

P: n/a
aa*********@gmail.com schreef:
>
C++

THAT IS FOR FAGS
You said C++ mattered because it runs natively on Windows. So according
to you VB6 runs natively on Windows, so VB6 is for fags too. Meaning
you're a fag.

How's that for some AK logic.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v
Feb 15 '07 #40

P: n/a
C-Services Holland b.v. wrote:
aa*********@gmail.com schreef:
>>
C++

THAT IS FOR FAGS

You said C++ mattered because it runs natively on Windows. So according
to you VB6 runs natively on Windows, so VB6 is for fags too. Meaning
you're a fag.

How's that for some AK logic.
Oh, I get it. Arron Le Menace is the son of Dennis Le Menace in a
continuing role.
Feb 15 '07 #41

P: n/a
aa*********@gmail.com <aa*********@gmail.comThou pilchard. Has thou
not a brain? Thou imbecile. Thou billowy-headed, manky malapert. Ye
execrated and ye nitpicked:
and are you mother fucking kidding me?

C++

THAT IS FOR FAGS
Real meaning: "I don't know C++."

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_****************@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"
Feb 15 '07 #42

P: n/a
I don't need to change gears.

I just don't see the value proposition in using a language that is
TWICE AS VERBOSE AND ONE QUARTER AS FUNCTIONAL

why can't I write DOTNET and paste it into Excel?
why can't I write DOTNET and paste it into VBS?
why can't I write DOTNET and paste it into SQL Jobs steps?
why can't I write DOTNET and paste it into CLIENTSIDE DHTML?

DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?
DO I MOTHER FUCKING NEED TO GO FROM ONE LANGUAGE TO FOUR?

fuck that noise; I'll stick with PHP and Dreamweaver, fucknuts


On Feb 14, 10:46 am, Maximum Hag <Maximum...@Hag.comwrote:
Jay Parzych wrote:
please provide title and page number of said books
Dear Mr Arnold:
RE:
You can use VBScript, JavaScript and ECMAScript in ASP.NET solution
on
the client or server side.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN WRITING FROM MICROSOFT.

http://www.codeplex.com/AjaxProhttp:...2a(VS.80).aspx

I am just the messenger.

And the boy is talking MS Press books that only give you a foundation to
start with and nothing else. The boy couldn't change gears if the gear
hit him in his big mouth.

Feb 15 '07 #43

P: n/a
I am so sorry kid, but are you trying to imply that clientside
vbScript was introduced in ASP.net 2.0?

either way; MS demonstrated their true colors; they killed VB for no
reason-- it was and _IS_ the worlds most popular language.

AND I SURE AS HELL AM NOT TALKING ABOUT DOTNET CRAP

On Feb 14, 12:50 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
aaron.ke...@gmail.com wrote:

<snipped>

http://www.devasp.net/net/articles/display/232.html

Feb 15 '07 #44

P: n/a
No wonder you're too fucking stupid to question AUTHORITY
you just sit there and listen to people when they tell you shit don't
you?

do you LIKE using a language that is TWICE AS VERBOSE AND ONE QUARTER
THE FUNCTIONALITY??

On Feb 14, 10:30 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
Bruce W. Darby wrote:
Thanks Mr. Arnold,
You raised my level of understanding a bit more today.
Bruce

You're welcomed. I have been in IT since 1971. I have been programing
professionally since 1980 on various platforms using many types of
languages. Really, nothing has changed that much.

The only thing that has changed is the rift raft that now populates the
programming ranks, calling themselves programmers.

Feb 15 '07 #45

P: n/a
javascript is not more browser independent

javascript is SLOW javascript is NOT COMPATABILE

MS MOTHER FUCKING KILLED VB FOR NO REASON AND I REFUSE TO MOVE TO JAVA
OR C _CRAP_
fuck _AJAX_

I want to know why we don't have AVAX
I want to know why we don't have AVAX
I want to know why we don't have AVAX
I want to know why we don't have AVAX
I want to know why we don't have AVAX

On Feb 14, 11:46 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <"Mr. Arnold"@Arnold.COMwrote:
Bruce W. Darby wrote:
1971.... Ah, the 8th grade for me! LOL I don't feel so old anymore. :) But
there is one thing I think I need to gag out.... Aaron (i.e., susie, hooker,
punjab_tom, et. al.) is correct when he stated that MS has stated that
VBScript is not supported in ASP.Net. I found an article that I posted
earlier today from the MSDN site claiming that factoid. I'm not sure if
anyone has been able to rebut 'this' particular claim by said individual.
All of the articles that you posted in rebuttal show no VBScript being used
on the client side of a .Net web app. It's all Javascript. They do mention
using VB.Net to code, but not VBScript. My thinking on this is that MS felt
that VB.Net was simple enough to use in a scripting environment that they
did not feel it necessary to continue that particular subset of the Visual
Basic language into the .Net environment, not to mention the fact that WMI
has pretty much replaced VBScript and that IS ASP.Net capable. :)

Books are static and program development languages are not static. I
have shown you that .NET 2.0 can use VBscript or Javascript on the
client side and the scripting languages can call back to the Web server
to the CodeBehindFile that has no Webform or Web controls.

From what I have been told recently, and I can't verify it, is future
releases of .NET will be using Javascript as its main scripting language
, because it's more browser independent. The only time I have used
VBscript is with ASP 3.0 and below.

I really like using Ajax Pro for .Net, HTML, DHTML and Javascript with
Javascript calling back to the ASP.Net CodeBehindFile to do the back-end
processing via Ajax Pro.

But I now see that I can do the same thing possibly with ASP.Net 2.0 and
not need Ajax Pro. I don't know if I can bind an object, collection of
objects, or ADO datasets using this .NET 2.0 method and bring things
back to Javascript like I can with Ajax Pro, which Ajax Pro is free.

If you really want to see how powerful .Net solutions can be or will be,
then I suggest that you get one of the CSLA books, put the CSLA
Framework and demo project together and run it. I base all of my OOPs
concepts on the CSLA base objects with the Remoting, Web service, etc
etc ripped out. I keep the concepts of properties, methods, object
state, ADO.NET (SmartData reader) and other concepts of persisting data.

http://www.lhotka.net/Article.aspx?i...a-bacb-e0059cc...

There are books for .Netframe work 1.x.

Feb 15 '07 #46

P: n/a
no dude

C++ and Java are for FAGS because I can out develop those dipshits
and Europe is for fags because you've got dipshits like mitterand
running the show


On Feb 15, 1:53 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<cshNOSPAMPLE...@csh4u.nlwrote:
aaron.ke...@gmail.com schreef:
C++
THAT IS FOR FAGS

You said C++ mattered because it runs natively on Windows. So according
to you VB6 runs natively on Windows, so VB6 is for fags too. Meaning
you're a fag.

How's that for some AK logic.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

Feb 15 '07 #47

P: n/a
REAL MEANING:

I DO NOT NEED TO KNOW C; I TOOK SOME CLASSES ON IT; THROUGH A SEMESTER
OF CLASSES I CANNOT PRODUCT ONE TENTH OF WHAT I CAN DO IN VB.

THAT IS ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW ABOUT C.

C IS IMPRACTICAL.

VB WON THE POPULARITY CONTEST.
AND MS KILLED VB BECAUSE THEY DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT PROGRAMMERS

On Feb 15, 3:55 am, "Rhizobacter Turpis Alba Vesiculovirus" <teutonic-
common-t...@moist-wet-wrinkle.orgwrote:
aaron.ke...@gmail.com <aaron.ke...@gmail.comThou pilchard. Has thou
not a brain? Thou imbecile. Thou billowy-headed, manky malapert. Ye
execrated and ye nitpicked:
and are you mother fucking kidding me?
C++
THAT IS FOR FAGS

Real meaning: "I don't know C++."

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6...@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"

Feb 15 '07 #48

P: n/a
We all see that you're some kind of lunatic and you need to be locked up.
Feb 15 '07 #49

P: n/a
You need Proack Arron Le Menace.
Feb 15 '07 #50

102 Replies

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.