when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I stop

[susiedba]

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

[dbahooker]

I agree Susie, it is time to make a stand.

I urge Microsoft to undo these past 5 years and start taking VB
seriously again.

for starters, name the next version 'B #' as in BEE SHARP.
and bring back VB COM

[RobinS]

The solution is for you to get over what you can't change and move on,
Aaron. I feel quite sorry for you.

Robin S.
-------------------------------------------
<su******@hotmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@a34g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

[aaron.kempf]

I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred

and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.

I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP

-Aaron

[susiedba]

Robin

I feel bad for you, you're the dipshit that is following the other
lambs into the slaughter

MICROSOFT KILLED VB ONCE DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST THEM TO NOT INVENT
VISUAL FRED AGAIN?

-Susie

[susiedba]

what I need to do is go and be a computer science professor so that I
can warn these kids to not trust Microsoft, they killed a language.
I'm not talking about _DAMAGING_ a language-- I am talking about
killing a language.

UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT _NECESSARY_

[RobinS]

<aa*********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@a34g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

>I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred

I don't agree with that. Anyway, wait a couple of years, and you'll be
*really* screwed, when it doesn't run on whatever comes after Vista.

and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.

The same could be said of Warren Buffett. But he's good at *something*.

I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP

Good luck with that.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

[RobinS]

<su******@hotmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@v45g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com...

Robin

I feel bad for you, you're the dipshit that is following the other
lambs into the slaughter

MICROSOFT KILLED VB ONCE DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST THEM TO NOT INVENT
VISUAL FRED AGAIN?

-Susie

I don't care if they do. I'll adapt and continue being successful at making
my customers happy.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

[dbahooker]

yeah but when you need to give them a $50,000 quote to make their apps
work in .NET?

it's just not practical

[Larry Linson]

Susie / Aaron / Tom

thank you for standing up for what is right.

I think that you should be Sr Management at Microsoft

I know I'm not scared of a couple of 4-letter words and some capital
letters

-Larry

On Feb 10, 11:19 am, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

<[e-mail] in message

news:11**********************@v45g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com...

Robin

I feel bad for you, you're the dipshit that is following the other
lambs into the slaughter

MICROSOFT KILLED VB ONCE DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST THEM TO NOT INVENT
VISUAL FRED AGAIN?

-Susie

I don't care if they do. I'll adapt and continue being successful at making
my customers happy.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

[susiedba]

Robin

sorry, bitch, VB 2002, VB 2003 and VB 2005 DO NOT WORK ON VISTA, SO
POO ON YOU

'oh but wait the version _AFTER_ vista'

what in 2020?

-Susie

On Feb 10, 11:18 am, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

<[e-mail] in message

news:11*********************@a34g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred

I don't agree with that. Anyway, wait a couple of years, and you'll be
*really* screwed, when it doesn't run on whatever comes after Vista.

and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.

The same could be said of Warren Buffett. But he's good at *something*.

I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP

Good luck with that.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

[susiedba]

you do not agree with me?

let me count

SQL Server 2000
SQL Server 2005
Access
Excel
Project
Word
Visio
Outlook
Windows Script Host
ASP
DHTML

and let me count how many places that VB 2005 works

uh
desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)


ROFL

looks to me like it is a _DOTLOT_ less than 1/4, huh?

On Feb 10, 11:18 am, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

<[e-mail] in message

news:11*********************@a34g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred

I don't agree with that. Anyway, wait a couple of years, and you'll be
*really* screwed, when it doesn't run on whatever comes after Vista.

and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.

The same could be said of Warren Buffett. But he's good at *something*.

I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP

Good luck with that.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

Larry Linson schreef:

Susie / Aaron / Tom

thank you for standing up for what is right.

I think that you should be Sr Management at Microsoft

I know I'm not scared of a couple of 4-letter words and some capital
letters

-Larry

You're agreeing with your other 3 aliases. How cute. And don't say that
it's not true, because the headers betray you.

Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aaron wrote:

desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)

wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
See I can say stuff 5 times too.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[susiedba]

maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over


On Feb 13, 4:39 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

Larry Linson schreef:

Susie / Aaron / Tom

thank you for standing up for what is right.

I think that you should be Sr Management at Microsoft

I know I'm not scared of a couple of 4-letter words and some capital
letters

-Larry

You're agreeing with your other 3 aliases. How cute. And don't say that
it's not true, because the headers betray you.

Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[susiedba]

I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL

On Feb 13, 4:41 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

aaron wrote:

desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)

wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista

See I can say stuff 5 times too.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[susiedba]

and please buddy; please tell me what percentage of DESKTOPS have the
framework on them?

thanks


On Feb 13, 4:41 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

aaron wrote:

desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)

wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista

See I can say stuff 5 times too.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

That is of no importance. It's on the CD they get when they buy the
program. Just as they need to install stuff for VB6 when they buy one
of our programs written in VB6. That's also not just 1 executable. The
only difference is, is that the .NET framework is a few MB's larger.
su******@hotmail.com schreef:

and please buddy; please tell me what percentage of DESKTOPS have the
framework on them?

thanks

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

su******@hotmail.com schreef:

I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL

You can disagree all you want. It's a fact that our program works just
fine on our Vista Enterprise computer.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

su******@hotmail.com schreef:

maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over

Right, and you all just happen to get the exact same IP address every
time you dialup. Give it up. Oh and panzers.. that's a different country.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

what, Panzers didn't kick the shit out of your country?
or was it paratroopers

either way; it took about a WEEK right?

STFU or else I will send some more over the border

On Feb 14, 4:34 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

[e-mail] schreef:

maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over

Right, and you all just happen to get the exact same IP address every
time you dialup. Give it up. Oh and panzers.. that's a different country.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

I am so sorry kid
you're trying to tell me that you _SELL_ prepackaged, commercial apps
using VB.net?

ROFL

VB? THAT IS A _KIDS_ LANGUAGE
and just because VB 2005 _MIGHT_ run on some copies of Vista _WITH A
PATCH AND A RECOMPILE_ that doesn't mean that VB 2005 is 'VIsta
Ready'

THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
MS wanted to name VB = 'Kids Programming Language' but someone already
used that phrase
the framework is _NOT_ a 'few mb larger'

the framework is _NOT_ on anyones' desktops.

they don't need to install jack shit to run vb6 programs. it is
included with WINDOWS, kid

On Feb 14, 4:29 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

That is of no importance. It's on the CD they get when they buy the
program. Just as they need to install stuff for VB6 when they buy one
of our programs written in VB6. That's also not just 1 executable. The
only difference is, is that the .NET framework is a few MB's larger.

[e-mail] schreef:

and please buddy; please tell me what percentage of DESKTOPS have the
framework on them?

thanks

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

MS has a 70% solution again; except this time it is a 10% solution.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER
DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

On Feb 14, 4:31 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

[e-mail] schreef:

I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL

You can disagree all you want. It's a fact that our program works just
fine on our Vista Enterprise computer.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

That's like telling the kids in Iraq to 'just adjust to the new way of
life (having American soldiers rape your moms and shoot your dads)'
IT MOTHER FUCKING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BITCH

VB DOTNET DOES NOT WORK ON ANY DESKTOPS STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT

VB6 _STILL_ WORKS EVERYWHERE



On Feb 9, 10:37 pm, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

The solution is for you to get over what you can't change and move on,
Aaron. I feel quite sorry for you.

Robin S.
-------------------------------------------<[e-mail] in message

news:11**********************@a34g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gmail.com schreef:

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

You seem to have a fascination about homosexuals because you seem to
call everyone one. Maybe you should come out of the closet.

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

Because we need to test our apps on current operating systems because
our customers are using or will be using it. But I guess cross platform
testing is a something you never heard of. You just figure it runs on
your development pc and that's it. Oh, and we didn't run out to buy it.
It's in the MSDN subscription.

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Priorities are to test it on the available platforms.

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

That is a bogus statement. If that were true then my computer would be
performing magic by running it. Ofcourse there's always some hardware
that doesn't run it. But that's the same as complaining back in '95 that
Win95 didn't run on your 386 with 16MB memory. Dotnet is installed on
plenty desktops if it's regularly updated. And if it's not just run the
friggin dotnetfx.exe.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER

You said VB6 is a kiddie language. So does that matter? And no, our
classic VB apps don't work natively on windows.
They still need extra libraries to be installed.

DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

Keep working in VB6, no one is stopping you.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gmail.com schreef:

I am so sorry kid
you're trying to tell me that you _SELL_ prepackaged, commercial apps
using VB.net?

ROFL

VB? THAT IS A _KIDS_ LANGUAGE
and just because VB 2005 _MIGHT_ run on some copies of Vista _WITH A
PATCH AND A RECOMPILE_ that doesn't mean that VB 2005 is 'VIsta
Ready'

Bullshit, the program was compiled on WinXP and it ran on a fresh Vista
install. Ah, and VB is a kids language is it. VB6 is also VB I guess you
want your kiddie language supported for the next millennium to come.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gmail.com schreef:

what, Panzers didn't kick the shit out of your country?
or was it paratroopers

either way; it took about a WEEK right?

STFU or else I will send some more over the border

Like the ships that were sunk in PH? That took all of a few hours right?

Anyway, time to *PLONK* your aliases now. This one and all of your other 15.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

please tell me FAG how Dotnet is on a desktop if it gets updated
frequently.

is the framework a standard install? or is it an optional install at
Windows Update?

is that what you are referring to?

what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?

what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?

On Feb 15, 1:48 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<[e-mail]:

[e-mail] schreef:

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

You seem to have a fascination about homosexuals because you seem to
call everyone one. Maybe you should come out of the closet.

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

Because we need to test our apps on current operating systems because
our customers are using or will be using it. But I guess cross platform
testing is a something you never heard of. You just figure it runs on
your development pc and that's it. Oh, and we didn't run out to buy it.
It's in the MSDN subscription.

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Priorities are to test it on the available platforms.

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

That is a bogus statement. If that were true then my computer would be
performing magic by running it. Ofcourse there's always some hardware
that doesn't run it. But that's the same as complaining back in '95 that
Win95 didn't run on your 386 with 16MB memory. Dotnet is installed on
plenty desktops if it's regularly updated. And if it's not just run the
friggin dotnetfx.exe.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER

You said VB6 is a kiddie language. So does that matter? And no, our
classic VB apps don't work natively on windows.
They still need extra libraries to be installed.

DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

Keep working in VB6, no one is stopping you.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v